Wednesday, August 13, 2025

*SG60: The future of Singapore’s economy*

*SG60: The future of Singapore’s economy*

To remain a leading global hub, the Republic must double down on targeted policy innovation, societal adaptability and visionary leadership.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/sg60-the-future-of-singapores-economy

2025-08-13

By Dr Khor Hoe Ee
Former Assistant Managing Director at the Monetary Authority of Singapore

=====

As Singapore stands on the threshold of a new economic era, the central question is: What must we do today to thrive tomorrow?

Over the next decade, the global landscape will be shaped by rapid technological advancement, climate change, demographic shifts, geo-economic fragmentation, and geopolitical polarisation.

To remain a leading global hub and a resilient, vibrant society, Singapore must double down on targeted policy innovation, societal adaptability and visionary leadership.

A legacy of reinvention
Singapore has a long history of transformation. As a small island nation of six million people, its economic ascent has been propelled by strategic location, good governance and pragmatic policymaking.

From a bustling trading post in precolonial times to an independent state in 1965, Singapore swiftly industrialised by attracting foreign direct investment and leveraging low-cost labour for export-oriented growth.

In the 1970s, tightening labour markets and rising wages prompted a shift towards higher-value industries. Economic setbacks followed: oil shocks in 1975 and 1979, and a recession in 1985 due to eroded competitiveness.

Singapore responded decisively, cutting wages and rebounding swiftly. A similar resilience was seen during the Asian financial crisis in 1997-1998, and the global financial crisis a decade later.

Structural reforms in the 2000s diversified the economy into financial and business services, high-tech manufacturing and the biomedical industry.

Despite recent shocks – including economic disruptions due to the Covid-19 pandemic, higher global inflation and interest rates triggered by the war in Ukraine, protectionist trade policies and heightened US-China tensions – Singapore has responded by skilfully leveraging its fiscal buffers to turn adversity into opportunity.

Embracing technological transformation
Singapore now enters a critical phase of economic restructuring, driven by rapid advances in digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI).

The advent of generative AI, process automation and robotics presents a powerful opportunity to boost productivity and efficiency amid rising costs, a tight labour market and an ageing population.

However, it also poses risks of widespread disruption to employment – particularly in middle-skill, routine and data-intensive jobs across manufacturing, finance, law, healthcare and transport. New entrants to the workforce will struggle to find employment in traditional sectors.This shift demands a deliberate and inclusive national response.

To maintain global competitiveness, the government must support both startups and incumbent enterprises in adopting emerging technologies and reshaping business models.


Despite recent shocks, Singapore has responded by skilfully leveraging its fiscal buffers to turn adversity into opportunity. PHOTO: ST FILE
Government agencies such as Enterprise Singapore and the Infocomm Media Development Authority should enhance funding and advisory services that help businesses embrace and pivot to digital and AI-augmented operations. Regulatory sandboxes and public-private test beds can help scale innovation while managing risk.

At the same time, Singapore must proactively upskill its workforce. SkillsFuture must evolve into a dynamic, AI-enabled platform that offers real-time, individualised reskilling paths aligned with fast-changing job market needs.

Workforce Singapore and tripartite partners should coordinate to deliver stackable skill credentials, apprenticeship programmes and career conversion programmes that offer portable skills across sectors.

Protecting displaced workers and ensuring that young graduates have meaningful pathways into the new economy are essential for inclusive growth.

Leveraging green growth as a strategic advantage
The global climate change agenda is not just a moral imperative, but a strategic opportunity for Singapore to lead in green growth.

Far from being a compliance exercise, the green transition is a source of innovation, investment and long-term competitiveness. As countries impose carbon pricing, border adjustment taxes, and stricter environmental, social and governance (ESG) mandates, early movers such as Singapore can gain significant strategic advantages.

Singapore should aim to be the regional hub for carbon services, including carbon credit trading, emissions verification, and green finance.

The Singapore Exchange and Monetary Authority of Singapore have been proactive in developing the regulatory framework and promoting sustainable finance, including green bonds, transition finance and ESG disclosure standards. Regional initiatives, such as Project Greenprint, can serve as models for digital infrastructure that enable reliable tracking of carbon emissions and sustainability metrics.

Domestically, Singapore must accelerate decarbonisation by investing in solar energy, green hydrogen partnerships, energy storage systems and circular economy practices. Buildings and transportation – two high-emission sectors – should be fast-tracked for transformation through innovation grants and building codes.

Climate resilience is equally critical. Defending coastal infrastructure and adapting to extreme weather must remain top priorities. Policymaking should align green objectives with commercial incentives to drive private-sector innovation and participation in the transition.

Strengthening regional integration
While Asia will remain the growth engine for the global economy in the coming years, the global trading system is being challenged by protectionist policies and the global supply chains that are reconfiguring in response.As in the past, the supply chain reconfiguration presents an opportunity for Singapore to play a facilitating and coordinating role.

Despite rising costs, Singapore remains a premier gateway to Asean and broader Asia. Deepening regional integration can mitigate domestic constraints and broaden opportunities.

Singapore should champion seamless cross-border data flows, harmonised standards for e-commerce, and interoperable digital payment systems within Asean. Its leadership in the Asean Digital Economy Framework Agreement can help shape future-ready trade infrastructure.

In professional services, Singapore’s legal, healthcare and education sectors can be further internationalised by forming partnerships and regulatory bridges with neighbours.

Additionally, Singapore can leverage its strengths in governance, dispute resolution and project finance to co-lead regional infrastructure development. Initiatives such as the Belt and Road – if aligned with transparency and sustainability – offer platforms where Singapore can serve as a neutral, trustworthy intermediary.

Building an inclusive and resilient society
A high-tech economy must not come at the cost of social cohesion. Technological and structural changes will exacerbate inequalities if left unmanaged.

As the gig economy grows and traditional employment declines, Singapore must fortify its social compact by revamping and enhancing the social protection framework to reflect new modes of work and emerging vulnerabilities.


Singapore must fortify its social compact by revamping and enhancing the social protection framework to reflect new modes of work and emerging vulnerabilities. PHOTO: ST FILE
Gig workers, freelancers and part-time workers require access to portable benefits including health insurance, Central Provident Fund-style retirement savings and unemployment support. The rise of platform work necessitates adaptive policy tools – such as centralised benefits administration and universal access to basic protections – while preserving flexibility.

Beyond labour reform, Singapore must address demographic pressures by empowering women, seniors and marginalised communities.

Family-friendly policies – including affordable childcare, parental leave and caregiver support – can enhance workforce participation and help reverse declining fertility. Age-inclusive hiring, flexible working arrangements and senior training programmes are critical to extend productive lifespans. The goal is a society that is not just future-ready, but also future-inclusive.

Redefining education
Singapore’s world-class education system has underpinned its economic success, but the education system must now evolve to keep up with the rapid rise of AI and digital technology, and their impact on the workplace.

The nature of work is evolving more rapidly than traditional curricula can accommodate. Success in the AI era will depend not only on technical proficiency and knowledge acquisition, but also on agility, creativity and the capacity for lifelong learning.


The education system must evolve to keep up with the rapid rise of AI and digital technology, and their impact on the workplace. PHOTO: ST FILE
Education must become more experiential, interdisciplinary and learner-centric.

Beyond academic rigour, schools should nurture curiosity, collaboration and ethical decision-making.Students should learn to be more discriminating in their consumption of news and information in the age of social media.Tertiary institutions must partner with industry to co-design programmes that equip students with evolving job market skills needed to operate in an AI-augmented environment.

Most importantly, learning must continue throughout life. Lifelong learning should be normalised through incentives, digital credentials and recognition frameworks that value all forms of growth.

Singapore has repeatedly turned challenges and adversity into opportunities and success – through industrialisation, globalisation, and constantly upgrading and moving up the global value chain.

The next transformation will be more complex andchallenging – balancing technological efficiency with social equity, environmental sustainability with growth, and geopolitical risk with regional cooperation.

The nation’s small size need not be a weakness, but a strength – enabling agility, precision and unity of purpose. With visionary leadership, an inclusive society and a willingness to adapt and innovate, Singapore can once again defy the odds.

The next decade offers not only challenges, but also an opportunity to write the next chapter of resilience, renewal and reinvention.


====

The writer was chief economist of Asean+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (Amro) from 2016 to 2025, where he was responsible for country and regional surveillance, as well as related research activities, of the Asean+3 economies.

Prior to joining Amro, Dr Khor was deputy director of the Asia and Pacific department at the International Monetary Fund, overseeing the surveillance work on six Asean and 12 Pacific Island countries.

He was previously also assistant managing director at the Monetary Authority of Singapore,where he oversaw economic research, monetary policy, macro-financial surveillance and international relations.

吴俊刚:见微知著看60年国家财政

吴俊刚:见微知著看60年国家财政

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20250813-7344115?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2025-08-13


所有基础设施和80%人口居住的组屋,都须要周期性的维修和翻新,也都需要庞大的累积基金备用。要做到这点,不外两个方法,第一是财政上要量入为出,不能寅吃卯粮。第二是要把经济大饼做大。

8月7日,《海峡时报》一则报道凸显一些共管公寓年久失修的问题。以实乞纳附近建成屋龄已31年的芬木大厦(Fernwood Towers)公寓为例,几年前就出现电梯经常失灵的问题,有时整座楼的电梯全都失灵,住在高楼的住户只得爬20层楼回家。

究其原因,主要是公寓的分层地契管理委员会钱不够用,累积基金(sinking funds)无法应付全面翻新电梯的费用,除非所有住户同意额外掏腰包,但许多住户都不愿意这么做,问题就一拖再拖。管委会好不容易才通过决议,征集170万元用来翻新电梯,由200多名住户分摊,每户可分期付款24个月,每月平均300多元。

业界估计,我国全岛有约2700个公寓项目,其中有836个至少已超过30年。再过10年,如果无法集体出售,老旧公寓就可能达到1160个,占总数约31%。它们面对的问题包括电梯失灵、漏水、电线老旧等。早期落成的公寓,对累积基金的要求较低,导致无法满足各项大翻新的需要。近年来,一些较老旧的公寓获得发展商青睐,得以集体出售并重新发展,但像芬木大厦等公寓,都因某种原因求售不果。

比起私人公寓,最早建于1960和70年代的政府组屋,更早面对必须翻新的问题。但这些问题都获得政府出面解决,因此,组屋居民没有相关的苦恼,真太幸福了!

这些年来,政府采取多种手段解决组屋老旧的问题,包括选择性整体重建计划(简称SERS)、电梯翻新计划、电线翻新计划、家居改进计划等。私人公寓就没有这样的优惠。就在8月10日,国家发展部长徐芳达又宣布一连串与组屋相关的好消息,包括制定自愿提早重建计划(简称VERS),在未来二三十年里,分阶段陆续为老旧组屋进行重建。此外,政府也会通过第二次家居改进计划(HIP II)、乐龄翻新计划以及邻区更新计划等方式,协助维持组屋和市镇的宜居性与活力。

相形之下,组屋居民真可说是天之骄子。日常打扫清洁等工作有市镇理事会负责,各种翻新有政府资助,居民只须负担极小的份额,每月所需缴付的服务费和杂费也很少。除此之外,组屋居民能享受到的各种政府财政转移也最多。这是世上仅有的。不过,有些组屋居民还是希望住进公寓,觉得公寓有较大的隐私和更多设施。开始的十几二十年也许还可以,住久了就要面对上述难以解决的私宅问题。

政府不惜工本,大量津贴政府组屋,最大目的是要所有公民居者有其屋,能够感受到这个国家人人有份,培养起归属感和认同感。甚至像马林百列那样珍贵的填海土地,也用以建设一个新镇。在新加坡,人们清楚看到,大部分土地是用来建造组屋的,新镇一个接一个,组屋也越建越现代化,以满足人们越来越高的要求。在其他国家和地区,土地绝大多数是用来卖钱的,包括卖给发展商建房子(没有政府建组屋这回事),卖给厂家建厂房,如我们熟悉的中国大陆和香港都是如此,没有一个国家和地区有可与新加坡比拟的公共建屋计划。

组屋的建造、维修和翻新是浩大工程,费用动辄算亿元,长此以往,财政如何持续是个问题。如果像其他国家一样,财政年年赤字,问题就大了。首先,建新房的速度可能要放慢,翻新数量可能要减少,可拖则拖。这一来,老旧的组屋将会越来越多,甚至逐渐沦为年久失修的陋屋区。各种组屋津贴恐怕也非缩减不可。发生这种情况,不管是执政党还是反对党管理的市镇会,就不会那么容易过日子了。它们很可能也会像一些老旧的共管公寓一样,捉襟见肘,最终非得大幅提高每月的杂费和服务费不可。

上述老旧公寓的例子,再次印证笔者过去曾在本栏谈过的问题:建设不易,维修更难,对各种需要投入大笔资金和漫长时间建设的基础设施而言,更是如此。这包括:机场、海港、公路、沟渠、桥梁、巴士、地铁、公园、巴刹、小贩中小、医院、学校、高等学府等。所有这些设施的建设,往往动辄以亿元计。兴建地铁如汤申东海岸线的建设,估计要耗资250亿元。政府在2020年就拟定875亿元的10年地铁发展预算。这样的大笔投入不为别的,只因新加坡岛面积太小,容不下太多私家车,绝大多数人必须能有便捷的公交服务才行。

1980年代,每条地铁线的兴建都要考虑到搭客人数是否能维持收支平衡,比如,早有计划的东北线,就因为估计搭客人数不足而一直拖延建造。后来,政府终于转变思维,不计工本兴建分布全岛的地铁网络,配合同样由政府资助的巴士网络,为民众提供出行便利。根据当局说法,现在每人每趟公交行程,政府都要津贴一元。

地铁的建造费高昂不在话下,维修费用同样惊人。在1980年代投入服务的东西和南北两线,在好几年前因为频频发生故障,必须耗资25亿元翻新。翻新的时间也耗力费时。之后的地铁线都建在地底下,隧道纵横交错,将来要翻新,难度肯定会比部分线路建在地面的东西南北线更大,恐怕也会更加昂贵。同样,巴士车队过了一定时限也必须更新,道路和水管也必须定时维修,机场和海港服务和设施,也必须不断推陈出新。

政府财政如果不预做准备,很容易会出现问题。美国和英国的地铁服务很早就开通,但都因为年久失修而问题多多,问题就在没钱。美国已累积36万亿美元(约46万亿新元)国债,哪有闲情管道路桥梁等基础设施的维修和翻新?伦敦的地铁也是如此。很多发展中国家的公路到处坑坑洼洼,关键也在没钱维修。一般说来,一个国家的基础建设,往往是在经济比较蓬勃的时期兴建的,一旦经济发展无法持续,或者政府频繁更迭轮换,每届政府都只顾短线操作,则各种设施的维修就会被忽略。

我们常说积谷防饥,说到国家储备金,通常也只想到可以帮我们度过非常时期,如冠病来袭、经济衰退等。所谓见微知著,从上述共管公寓的困境我们更须认识到,所有基础设施和80%人口居住的组屋,都须要周期性的维修和翻新,也都需要庞大的累积基金备用。要做到这点,不外两个方法,第一是财政上要量入为出,不能寅吃卯粮。第二是要确保经济能持续发展,帮助百业兴盛。只有这样,经济大饼才能继续做大,改善人民收入,税收也才能增加,使国库充盈,能应付越来越大的各种开支,同时有余钱可以拨入国家储备金,以备不时之需。由此观之,过去60年来,政府秉持的审慎财政政策是正确的。

(作者是前新闻工作者、前国会议员)

顶级人生智慧

Video 海姆立克急救法


 

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

幸福在于看到已经拥有的

潘政麟:幸福在于看到已经拥有的
https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20250812-7336841?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2025-08-12


当我们谈论幸福时,常常下意识将它和“拥有更多”画上等号。我们羡慕别人的高薪、西方国家的福利制度,或者更完善的城市基础设施;我们抱怨自己国家的通货膨胀、房价高企、薪资增长缓慢。然而,当我们静下心来比较世界不同角落,就会发现:原来我们所处的地方,也有许多别人羡慕不来的幸福。真正的幸福,往往不在于拥有多少,而在于能否看见、珍惜自己已经拥有的。

作为马来西亚人,尤其是住在新山的我,近年来常听见身边人对于生活费上涨的抱怨。确实,相较20年前,如今双层排屋已从20万令吉(约6万新元)飙升至70万令吉至90万令吉;一顿外食轻易就花掉二三十令吉。马国人总会说:生活越来越辛苦。这句话背后不只是数字的堆叠,更是一种情绪上的失衡,一种对过往物价、节奏、亲切感的怀念。

然而,当我站在另一角度,观察曾梦想前往的发达国家,例如英国、欧洲、美国,我开始重新思考幸福的定义。

以工作和税务为例,在伦敦工作,月薪3000英镑(约5180新元)看似优渥,但所得税税率起跳就是20%。也就是说,实得工资也就2400英镑左右。美国更是层层征税,联邦税率最低10%,加上各州自有的税收体系,例如加州综合税率高达30%至40%。反观新加坡,所得税税率在世界相对较低,一般中等收入者约7%,这也成为新加坡吸引外来人才的重要原因之一。

再谈交通。在伦敦,单日通勤费用可能高达15英镑;巴黎也差不多。新加坡的公共交通系统不仅高效便捷,费用也合理,单趟地铁或巴士票价仅约2新元,每日通勤花费不过4新元到6新元。

回头看看马国,虽然公共交通仍在完善中,但拥有私家车的成本相对低廉。政府长期补贴汽油价格,享有许多国家梦寐以求的便宜油价,这在高油价时代是一种可贵的民生保障。房价更是马国一大优势,外国朋友常对马国宽敞的双层排屋感到惊叹,难以置信几十万令吉就能拥抱这样的生活品质。

新加坡则有政府组屋系统提供相对可负担的住房,让人人有房可住。相比之下,许多发达国家仅一间小公寓就须耗资几十万元甚至上百万元本币,还要缴纳高额的房产税、维修费。

当然,幸福感并非只取决于数字,而是源于心理落差。新加坡人也会感慨:5元的一餐看似便宜,其实从过去的3元一路上涨,幸福感反而在减弱。当价格上涨速度超越薪资时,哪怕只是一杯奶茶从2元涨到5元,也足以让人感到生活变得沉重。这更多是变化带来的失衡,而非绝对价格的高低。我们以为幸福来自更高的收入、更先进的制度、更便利的城市功能,却常忽略脚下土地的温柔与包容。

人们常说他山之石,可以攻玉。确实,我时常羡慕新加坡的制度、效率和治理能力。但我也明白,世界上没有完美的国家,每一个地方都有不完美之处。就像新加坡人或许羡慕马国的土地辽阔、油价低廉、房价可负担;马国人却常羡慕新加坡的高收入与高效率。

幸福的标准从来不是一成不变的,不该只围绕着金钱、物质的多寡,而应着眼于心态和感受。不断放大“不足”之处,幸福感自然就越来越遥远;反之,学会欣赏眼前的一切,幸福其实就在身边。

有一句话这样说:幸福不是你拥有多少,而是你是否意识到你已经拥有很多。或许这正是许多现代人所遗忘的,我们有温暖的家人、还算安稳的生活环境、互相扶持的朋友、有饭吃、有地方住、有自由表达意见的权利,这在某些国家或地区都是遥不可及的梦想。

我曾深深羡慕西方国家,觉得西方月亮比较圆。可当亲身走了一圈,才体悟到:东南亚尤其是新马一带,才是真正适合扎根之地。低税率、社会安定、空气清新、医疗尚可、周末还能轻松出游,不必一辈子为房贷所困。这些看似平凡的日常,其实正是最踏实的幸福。

所以,幸福并非总在远方,往往就在我们身边。只要换个角度看世界,用一颗知足的心去体会生活,不必拥有一切,也能觉得富足。别让焦虑蒙蔽我们原本拥有的阳光,别让对外界的羡慕,遮蔽我们脚下的土地。

幸福,就是当你愿意张开眼睛,好好看一看,你其实早已拥有许多。

(作者是清华大学的马来西亚研究生)

Monday, August 11, 2025

牢记十恩

ChatGPT’s tool for students is great in theory, wobbly in practice

ChatGPT’s tool for students is great in theory, wobbly in practice

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/chatgpts-tool-for-students-is-great-in-theory-wobbly-in-practice

2025-08-11

By---Sandra Davie is senior education correspondent at The Straits Times.

=====

Amid rising concerns on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools by students, ChatGPT has launched a Study Mode option to encourage responsible academic use of the chatbot.

When a student selects the new mode and poses a question, the bot becomes a tutor and explains each step of the solution instead of jumping directly to the final answer.

For example, when students ask for help with Bayes’ theorem, a mathematical formula, the bot asks what level of maths they are comfortable with and what their goal is before initiating a gradual learning process.

Study Mode is being released as universities around the world grapple with the issue of AI misuse among their students.

In Singapore, the debate became heated in June after Nanyang Technological University decided to award three students zero marks for an assignment after discovering they had used generative AI tools in their work.

Will it harm or help?
Besides the issue of academic misuse and whether AI helps or hinders learning, emerging research has also raised concerns on AI’s impact on kids’ brains.

One study released in June 2025 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology compared students who were asked to use ChatGPT to write SAT essays with those who wrote them with no tools and those who wrote them with the help of Google.

They found that the students who used ChatGPT had lower brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic and behavioural levels”.

US media reports have pointed out that the release of Study Mode at the start of the new academic year is part of a wider push by OpenAI to get AI more embedded into classrooms.

When asked why the company decided to develop Study Mode, OpenAI’s head of education Leah Belsky told The Straits Times that students are already using ChatGPT every day to help them learn, with one in three college students in the US relying on it regularly.

“We do hear from students that many wanted more than quick answers. They wanted guidance, hints and a way to think through problems step by step. Study Mode is our response to that need,” she said, adding that the company’s experts spent time with educators, parents and academic institutions around the world to understand what behaviours help drive student engagement and improve longer-term learning outcomes.

Educators who have tried out the new tool gave it the thumbs up, with some saying it is heartening that OpenAI, the leading AI company, is looking at how it can encourage more responsible use of their tools in education.

Associate Professor Jason Tan from the National Institute of Education sees Study Mode as another tool to help students learn at their own pace, aligned to their learning style.

He said: “Educators recognise that it’s in adaptive learning that AI can play a big part in education and in Singapore we are already using that. You can see many examples of that in the SLS, the Student Learning Space, which is available to all students in the national school system.  

“The AI-powered platform makes customised learning recommendations for each student, based on how the student responds to questions and activities as they learn a topic.”

But he and other educators have pointed out that the onus is still on students to switch to Study Mode, instead of using AI to do the homework for them. Will they?


More On This Topic

More universities using artificial intelligence in class but some students have mixed feelings

Students at S’pore universities allowed to use AI tools for assignments but must stick to rules


This is a valid concern. After all, students can switch to regular ChatGPT mode with just one click, and copy and paste to complete an assignment in a much shorter time.

This means the feature’s effectiveness largely depends on a student’s motivation to learn things by himself, instead of taking shortcuts.

This is where skilled teachers come in, said Prof Tan.

He has a point. Motivation to learn can only come about from teachers igniting their students’ curiosity and leading them to discover things on their own or crack a puzzle – in short, it’s about the joy of learning.

It also comes from being in a room with other people who see things differently, with some even holding views opposite to your own and insistent on getting others to hear them.

As learning experts say, some friction – the kind that challenges us to reflect, revise and wrestle with complex and opposing ideas – is what truly drives learning.

You won’t get that from AI bots, which are trained to be polite and please users.

Already too late?

Three students from local universities who gave “honest” reviews of Study Mode said it was a good tool for learning a topic, but noted that it takes time to follow the lesson, step by step.

The three, who declined to be named, said they were more likely to use Study Mode if they needed to master a topic for a pen and paper exam. But they admitted they are more likely to use the regular ChatGPT to complete essays, especially if they are short of time.

One of the three, a second-year student, said: “Honestly, because most of us already use ChatGPT to do an outline, and then maybe even the final refinement, it’s going to be hard to break that habit and switch to Study Mode, especially since the mode requires you to spend a lot more time.”

Her point was echoed in a Forum letter written by a 15-year-old who recounted how she asked ChatGPT to solve a maths problem, because she ran out of time. She felt relieved but also guilty as she was outsourcing her learning.

As the writer rightly pointed out, students need to self-reflect and ask themselves if they are indeed learning. Parents and educators can inquire, without judgment, on how students are using AI. Schools need to set boundaries and teach students to understand the capabilities and limitations of AI tools used for learning and require students to log their use of AI.

Meanwhile, OpenAI’s Ms Belsky said the company will continue to improve its products for learning as more is known about how students learn best with AI.

She said: “Similar to other product announcements, we approach product roll-outs by being iterative. This means putting our products and features out in the world, learning how people use them, getting feedback and building safeguards that evolve with the technology.” 


More On This Topic

It’s time our exams caught up with the future

5 plagiarism detection tools to tell if content is written by AI bot


Asked if OpenAI would consider developing a platform for schools which would allow only Study Mode and refuse if a student prompted it to write an entire essay or answer a maths problem, she said: “Study Mode isn’t intended to stop students from using ChatGPT without it, but it does offer an experience closer to (having) a tutor for when that experience would be helpful.”

On whether Study Mode is likely to curb misuse of ChatGPT by students, she said: “AI is ultimately a tool. What matters most in education is how that tool is used.

“True learning takes struggle, it takes working with information, it takes really processing it. If students use AI as an answer mode, they’re not going to learn as effectively.

“Part of our journey here is really to help students and educators use AI in ways that will expand their critical thinking and creativity. AI needs to be used to give feedback and for personal tutoring, and to help you ask and answer questions in different ways. That’s how we’re going to advance learning.”

Study Mode appears to be an important step in AI-assisted education. However, its real success depends on how students use it and how they are guided and trained to use it.

There is no shortcut to learning.

Sandra Davie is senior education correspondent at The Straits Times.