Wednesday, December 31, 2025

臺灣解放,只剩半步之遙!中國正義使命2025軍演,三重炸裂內幕曝光!臺灣紅線,已被踩成紅毯?China is about to unify Ta...

Electricity and Gas Bill: Households to pay lower gas and electricity tariffs from January 2026 to March 2026

Households to pay lower gas and electricity tariffs from January to March    

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/households-to-pay-lower-gas-and-electricity-tariffs-from-january-to-march

2025-12-30

======

SINGAPORE – Households will pay less for electricity and gas from January to March due to lower energy and fuel costs.

Electricity tariffs for homes will decrease by 0.84 cent per kilowatt-hour (kWh), while gas tariffs will fall by 0.67 cent per kWh, before goods and services tax (GST).

In a statement on Dec 30, grid operator SP Group said the electricity tariffs for households will go down by 3 per cent from the previous quarter.

An average four-room HDB household can expect a $3.17 decrease in its monthly electricity bill before GST, for example.

In a separate statement on the same day, piped town gas provider City Energy said the gas tariff will decrease from 22.35 cents per kWh to 21.68 cents in the next three months.

Both operators attributed the drop in tariffs to lower energy and fuel costs.

Households had to pay more for gas and electricity in the previous quarter due to higher energy costs, according to a Sept 30 Straits Times report.

SP Group and City Energy review the electricity and gas tariffs every quarter based on guidelines set by the regulator, the Energy Market Authority.


The energy cost component of the electricity tariff for each quarter is set using the average natural gas prices in the first 2½ months of the preceding quarter.

The fuel cost component of the gas tariff for each quarter is set using the average fuel prices in the first 2½ months of the preceding quarter.

Electricity and gas tariffs can fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to volatile global fuel prices.


  • Daniel Lai is a journalist at the ST Now team, covering breaking news and international affairs.

早安 2025-12-31

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Monday, December 29, 2025

大哥哭著唱一首《一生不變》,沒有技巧全是感情!太痛!【cover.大勝歌歌】

《不惑之旅》(E) 观剧看点总结

《不惑之旅》观剧看点总结
 
1. 实力派演员飙戏,演技全程在线
陈建斌、梅婷两位戏骨领衔,精准诠释中年人的隐忍与纠结,把马列文的深沉固执、简单的淳朴坚韧刻画得入木三分;张籽沐饰演的叛逆少女马沐嘉层次感极强,配角涂松岩、刘威葳也将角色的复杂人性演绎得淋漓尽致,对手戏张力拉满。
2. 剧情贴近现实,戳中中年群体共鸣点
没有悬浮狗血剧情,聚焦北漂打拼、中年婚恋危机、亲子隔阂、职场功利博弈等真实议题,不管是简单的爱情与现实抉择,还是马列文的事业家庭双重困境,都能精准戳中当代人尤其是中年人的生活痛点与情感共鸣。
3. 角色弧光饱满,成长线清晰动人
剧中没有绝对的好坏人,每个角色都有鲜明的成长轨迹:叛逆少女从抵触到接纳、功利男从迷失到反思、失意前妻从依赖到独立,每个人都在困境中完成自我救赎与和解,人物塑造立体不扁平,观感真实不割裂。
4. 主题深刻有质感,越品越有味道
跳出普通都市情感剧的情爱局限,以“不惑”为核心探讨人生取舍、理想与世俗的平衡,台词有深意、剧情有内核,既满足日常观剧的情感需求,也能引发对人生、情感与初心的深层思考,耐看且有回味。
5. 情感线细腻戳心,多线并行不杂乱
主线简单与马列文的“慢热型”情感细腻克制,从互相试探到彼此托付,温情又戳心;副线冯春生与卓晓婷的功利婚姻、马列文与前妻的羁绊、简单与马沐嘉的师生情并行推进,每条线都紧扣核心,节奏适中不拖沓。
 
谢谢,再见。

不惑之旅 (D) at YouTube and 今日头条 Doubao Report

《不惑之旅》核心主题解读
 
1. 中年人的“不惑”与困惑
剧集以“不惑”为题,却聚焦中年群体的多重困境:马列文在事业、婚姻、亲子关系中挣扎,简单在爱情、事业的选择里迷茫,冯春生为功利放弃初心后陷入悔恨。展现了四十岁并非真正“不惑”,而是在困境中重新寻找自我、厘清人生方向的过程。
2. 爱情与现实的博弈
剧中呈现了两种极端的爱情观:简单坚守纯粹的情感,不为物质妥协;冯春生将爱情作为攀附的工具,最终得不偿失。通过对比揭示真正的爱情不应被物质与功利绑架,真诚与契合才是情感的核心,也反映了现实中普通人在爱情与物质间的挣扎。
3. 成长与和解的内核
角色们都经历了“打破自我—直面困境—实现和解”的成长:马沐嘉从叛逆封闭到理解父亲、接纳简单;王忆如从精神依赖到学会独立;马列文从固执自我到懂得包容与珍惜。传递出人生的成长不在于年龄,而在于敢于面对问题,并与自己、他人、生活达成和解的理念。
4. 理想与世俗的碰撞
马列文作为书商,坚守文化理想却屡遭商业现实的冲击;简单怀揣教育初心,在大城市的复杂环境中始终保持本心。剧集借此探讨在世俗的功利化浪潮中,如何守护内心的理想与底线,凸显了对精神价值的推崇。
 
需要我为你整理**《不惑之旅》经典台词盘点**,帮你更直观感受剧中的情感与思想吗?

不惑之旅 (C) at YouTube and 今日头条 Doubao Report

《不惑之旅》核心剧情脉络
 
1. 开端:北漂求职
简单辞去县城教师工作,为追随男友冯春生来到北京,却发现冯春生因攀附卓氏集团千金卓晓婷而变心,两人分手。走投无路的简单应聘成为书商马列文女儿马沐嘉的家庭教师。
2. 发展:相处与纠葛
- 简单与叛逆的马沐嘉从针锋相对到逐渐建立信任,也慢慢走进马列文的生活。
- 马列文因前妻王忆如精神状态不佳、女儿身有残疾,生活与事业陷入双重压力,简单的出现为他带来慰藉,二人渐生情愫。
- 冯春生与卓晓婷结婚后,并未获得想要的事业成功,反而因功利心与卓家产生矛盾,婚姻出现裂痕。
3. 高潮:矛盾爆发
- 马列文的事业遭遇重大危机,同时要处理与前妻王忆如的情感牵扯,以及女儿马沐嘉对他和简单关系的抵触。
- 简单在马列文的困境中选择陪伴,却也因这段关系面临外界的质疑和自身的内心挣扎。
- 冯春生在事业与婚姻的双重打击下,开始反思自己的选择,试图挽回与简单的过往,却已无法回头。
4. 结局:和解与成长
- 马列文最终化解事业危机,与女儿马沐嘉达成和解,王忆如也逐渐走出精神困境,开始独立生活。
- 简单凭借自己的坚持和善良,收获了马列文的真心,两人走到一起,迎来情感的归宿。
- 冯春生与卓晓婷在经历波折后,选择正视彼此的问题,重新思考婚姻的意义;剧中其他配角也各自找到人生的方向。
 
需要我为你提炼**《不惑之旅》的核心主题解读**,让你更深入理解这部剧的内涵吗?

不惑之旅 - 连续剧 (B) and 今日头条 - YouTube Doubao Report

不惑之旅 - 连续剧 (A) and 今日头条 - YouTube Doubao Report

这组画面出自都市情感剧《不惑之旅》,以下是核心信息梳理:
 
1. 剧集与角色
- 该剧由韩杰执导,陈建斌、梅婷领衔主演,2021年播出。
- 第一张图中角色是马沐嘉(张籽沐 饰),她是男主马列文的女儿,身有残疾且性格叛逆。
- 第二张图中人物是简单(梅婷 饰),她是马沐嘉的家庭教师,也是本剧女主角。
- 第三张图中人物是马列文(陈建斌 饰),他是书商总裁,马沐嘉的父亲。
2. 剧情背景
简单辞去县城教师工作到北京,成为马列文女儿的家教,在相处中与马列文产生情感纠葛,同时还要面对马沐嘉的叛逆、马列文复杂的家庭关系等问题。
 
我可以为你整理一份**《不惑之旅》主要人物关系表**,让你更清晰地了解角色间的关联,需要吗?

Sunday, December 28, 2025

My Weight Statistics (2025-12-28) --Monthly Weight Measurement on the 28th of Each Month Since 28 May 2007

My 18-year Weight Management Records from 2007-05-28 to 2025-12-28 (by Calorie Restriction, i.e. Dietary Energy Restriction):

My 18-year Weight Management Records from 2007-05-28 to 2025-12-28 (by Calorie Restriction, i.e. Dietary Energy Restriction):

Note: According to the Singapore Health Promotion Board, a Healthy BMI is greater than18.5 and less than 23.0. A BMI less than 18.5 would mean that the individual is at risk of nutrition deficiency diseases and osteoporosis. 

A BMI equal or greater than 23.0 would mean that the individual is at risk of obesity-related diseases. (Ref: DD-Md2022J28)

As of 2025-12-28,

Note: ### indicates BMI = 23 or > 23

Total number of Monthly Weight monitored was 223 (100%)

The no. of times my healthy BMI between 18.5 and 22.9 was 218 (97.757%)

The no. of times my unhealthy BMI equal or more than 23.000 was 5 (2.243%)

=======================

2007

2007-05-28 morning, my weight = 65.0 kg, BMI = 23.588###

2007-06-28 morning, my weight = 61.0 kg, BMI = 22.136

2007-07-28 morning, my weight = 59.0 kg, BMI = 21.410

2007-08-28 morning, my weight = 58.7 kg, BMI = 21.302

2007-09-28 morning, my weight = 57.5 kg, BMI = 20.866

2007-10-28 morning, my weight = 57.5 kg, BMI = 20.866

2007-11-28 morning, my weight = 56.2 kg, BMI = 20.394

2007-12-28 morning, my weight = 55.5 kg, BMI = 20.140

2008

2008-01-28 morning, my weight = 54.8 kg, BMI = 19.886

2008-02-28 morning, my weight = 54.8 kg, BMI = 19.886

2008-03-28 morning, my weight = 54.5 kg, BMI = 19.777

2008-04-28 morning, my weight = 54.4 kg, BMI = 19.741

2008-05-28 morning, my weight = 54.1 kg, BMI = 19.632

2008-06-28 morning, my weight = 54.6 kg, BMI = 19.814

2008-07-28 morning, my weight = 54.5 kg, BMI = 19.777

2008-08-28 morning, my weight = 54.3 kg, BMI = 19.705

2008-09-28 morning, my weight = 54.9 kg, BMI = 19.923

2008-10-28 morning, my weight = 55.3 kg, BMI = 20.068

2008-11-28 morning, my weight = 54.5 kg, BMI = 19.777

2008-12-28 morning, my weight = 55.6 kg, BMI = 20.177

2009

2009-01-28 morning, my weight = 54.8 kg, BMI = 19.886

2009-02-28 morning, my weight = 55.9 kg, BMI = 20.285

2009-03-28 morning, my weight = 54.8 kg, BMI = 19.886

2009-04-28 morning, my weight = 55.3 kg, BMI = 20.068

2009-05-28 morning, my weight = 55.4 kg, BMI = 20.104.

2009-06-28 morning, my weight = 55.2 kg, BMI = 20.031

2009-07-28 morning, my weight = 55.1 kg, BMI = 19.995

2009-08-28 morning, my weight = 55.2 kg, BMI = 20.031

2009-09-28 morning, my weight = 56.3 kg, BMI = 20.431

2009-10-28 morning, my weight = 55.8 kg, BMI = 20.249

2009-11-28 morning, my weight = 56.2 kg, BMI = 20.394

2009-12-28 morning, my weight = 56.1 kg, BMI = 20.358

2010

2010-01-28 morning, my weight = 55.6 kg, BMI = 20.177

2010-02-28 morning, my weight = 56.5 kg, BMI = 20.503

2010-03-28 morning, my weight = 56.4 kg, BMI = 20.467

2010-04-28 morning, my weight = 55.7 kg, BMI = 20.213

2010-05-28 morning, my weight = 55.1 kg, BMI = 19.995

2010-06-28 morning, my weight = 56.4 kg, BMI = 20.467

2010-07-28 morning, my weight = 55.5 kg, BMI = 20.140

2010-08-28 morning, my weight = 55.8 kg, BMI = 20.249

2010-09-28 morning, my weight = 55.8 kg, BMI = 20.249

2010-10-28 morning, my weight = 55.4 kg, BMI = 20.104

2010-11-28 morning, my weight = 55.6 kg, BMI = 20.177

2010-12-28 morning, my weight = 55.5 kg, BMI = 20.140

2011

2011-01-28 morning, my weight = 55.4 kg, BMI = 20.104

2011-02-28 morning, my weight = 56.5 kg, BMI = 20.503

2011-03-28 morning, my weight = 55.6 kg, BMI = 20.177

2011-04-28 morning, my weight = 55.7 kg, BMI = 20.213

2011-05-28 morning, my weight = 55.6 kg, BMI = 20.177

2011-06-28 morning, my weight = 56.3 kg, BMI = 20.431

2011-07-28 morning, my weight = 56.5 kg, BMI = 20.503

2011-08-28 morning, my weight = 56.9 kg, BMI = 20.649

2011-09-28 morning, my weight = 56.2 kg, BMI = 20.394

2011-10-28 morning, my weight = 56.8 kg, BMI = 20.613

2011-11-28 morning, my weight = 59.0 kg, BMI = 21.410

2011-12-28 morning, my weight = 60.3 kg, BMI = 21.882

2012

2012-01-28 morning, my weight = 61.5 kg, BMI = 22.318

2012-02-28 morning, my weight = 62.7 kg, BMI = 22.753

2012-03-28 morning, my weight = 62.5 kg, BMI = 22.681

2012-04-28 morning, my weight = 61.3 kg, BMI = 22.246

2012-05-28 morning, my weight = 60.7 kg, BMI = 22.028

2012-06-28 morning, my weight = 60.6 kg, BMI = 21.992

2012-07-28 morning, my weight = 61.2 kg, BMI = 22.209

2012-08-28 morning, my weight = 60.8 kg, BMI = 22.064

2012-09-28 morning, my weight = 61.5 kg, BMI = 22.318**

2012-10-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg, BMI = 22.608

2012-11-28 morning, my weight = 63.4 kg, BMI = 23.008###

2012-12-28 morning, my weight = 62.9 kg, BMI = 22.826

2013

2013-01-28 morning, my weight = 63.0 kg, BMI = 22.863

2013-02-28 morning, my weight = 62.1 kg, BMI = 22.536

2013-03-28 morning, my weight = 61.5 kg, BMI = 22.318

2013-04-28 morning, my weight = 63.1 kg, BMI = 22.899****

2013-05-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg, BMI = 22.608

2013-06-28 morning, my weight = 62.2 kg, BMI = 22.572

2013-07-28 morning, my weight = 62.4 kg, BMI = 22.645

2013-08-28 morning, my weight = 62.6 kg BMI = 22.717

2013-09-28 morning, my weight = 62.4 kg BMI = 22.645**

2013-10-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg BMI = 22.609

2013-11-28 morning, my weight = 63.1 kg BMI = 22.899

2013-12-28 morning, my weight = 64.4 kg BMI = 23.371###

2014

2014-01-28 morning, my weight = 63.6 kg, BMI = 23.080###

2014-02-28 morning, my weight = 63.3 kg, BMI = 22.971

2014-03-28 morning, my weight = 62.7 kg, BMI = 22.753

2014-04-28 morning, my weight = 62.7 kg, BMI = 22.753

2014-05-28 morning, my weight = 62.9 kg, BMI = 22.826

2014-06-28 morning, my weight = 63.1 kg BMI = 22.899

2014-07-28 morning, my weight = 62.7 kg, BMI = 22.753

2014-08-28 morning, my weight = 62.2 kg, BMI = 22.572

2014-09-28 morning, my weight = 61.2 kg, BMI = 22.209

2014-10-28 morning, my weight = 61.4 kg, BMI = 22.282

2014-11-28 morning, my weight = 60.2 kg, BMI = 21.846

2014-12-28 morning, my weight = 60.8 kg, BMI = 22.064

2015

2015-01-28 morning, my weight = 61.3 kg, BMI = 22.246

2015-02-28 morning, my weight = 61.8 kg, BMI = 22.427

2015-03-28 morning, my weight = 61.8 kg, BMI = 22.427

2015-04-28 morning, my weight = 62,5. kg, BMI = 22.681

2015-05-28 morning, my weight = 62.4 kg, BMI = 22.645

2015-06-28 morning, my weight = 63.6 kg, BMI = 23.080###

2015-07-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg BMI = 22.609

2015-08-28 morning, my weight = 62.2 kg, BMI = 22.572

2015-09-28 morning, my weight = 63.0 kg, BMI = 22.863

2015-10-28 morning, my weight = 63.2 kg, BMI = 22.935

2015-11-28 morning, my weight = 62.6 kg, BMI = 22.717

2015-12-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg BMI = 22.609

2016

2016-01-28 morning, my weight = 63.0 kg, BMI = 22.863

2016-02-28 morning, my weight = 62.8 kg, BMI = 22.790

2016-03-28 morning, my weight = 62.0 kg, BMI = 22.499

2016-04-28 morning, my weight = 62.0 kg, BMI = 22.499

2016-05-28 morning, my weight = 62.4 kg, BMI = 22.645

2016-06-28 morning, my weight = 62.1 kg, BMI = 22.536

2016-07-28 morning, my weight = 62.2 kg, BMI = 22.572

2016-08-28 morning, my weight = 62.6 kg, BMI = 22.717

2016-09-28 morning, my weight = 62.8 kg, BMI = 22.790

2016-10-28 morning, my weight = 62,5. kg, BMI = 22.681

2016-11-28 morning, my weight = 62.1 kg, BMI = 22.536

2016-12-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg, BMI = 22.608

2017

2017-01-28 morning, my weight = 62.9 kg, BMI = 22.826

2017-02-28 morning, my weight = 62.4 kg, BMI = 22.644

2017-03-28 morning, my weight = 62.8 kg, BMI = 22.789

2017-04-28 morning, my weight = 62.3 kg, BMI = 22.609

2017-05-28 morning, my weight = 62.2 kg, BMI = 22.572

2017-06-28 morning, my weight = 62.6 kg, BMI = 22.717

2017-07-28 morning, my weight = 62.4 kg, BMI = 22.645

2017-08-28 morning, my weight = 61.9 kg, BMI = 22.463

2017-09-28 morning, my weight = 62.0 kg, BMI = 22.499

2017-10-28 morning, my weight = 62.0 kg, BMI = 22.499

2017-11-28 morning, my weight = 61.5 kg, BMI = 22.318

2017-12-28 morning, my weight = 61.5 kg, BMI = 22.318

2018

My Weight 2018-01-28 0934 hr 61.0 kg BMI 22.136

My Weight 2018-02-28 0915 hr 60.7 kg BMI 22.027

My Weight 2018-03-28 0620 hr 61.0 kg BMI 22.136

My Weight 2018-04-28 1005 hr 61.7 kg BMI 22.390

My Weight 2018-05-28 0856 hr 60.5 kg BMI 21.955

My Weight 2018-06-28 0600 hr 61.4 kg BMI 22.281

My Weight 2018-07-28 0600 hr 62.2 kg BMI 22.572

My Weight 2018-08-28 0720 hr 61.4 kg BMI 22.281

My Weight 2018-09-28 0805 hr 62.1 kg BMI 22.535

My Weight 2018-10-28 0750 hr 61.3 kg BMI 22.24

My Weight 2018-11-28 1000 hr 61.5 kg BMI 22.318

My Weight 2018-12-28 0650 hr 62.5 kg BMI 22.681

2019

2019-01-28 at 1000 hr 60.9 kg BMI 22.100

2019-02-28 at 0946 hr 61.0 kg BMI 22.136

2019-03-28 at 0700 hr 62.4 kg BMI 22.644

2019-04-28 at 0828 hr 62.9 kg BMI 22.826

2019-05-28 at 0745 hr 62.4 kg BMI 22.826

2019-06-28 at 0650 hr 62.4 kg BMI 22.644

2019-07-28 at 0736 hr 62.8 kg BMI 22.789

2019-08-28 at 0629 hr 62.4 kg BMI 22.644

2019-09-28 at 0644 hr 61.9 kg BMI 22.463

2019-10-28 at 0740 hr 62.5 kg BMI 22.681

2019-11-28 at 0632 hr 62.8 kg BMI 22.789

2019-12-28 at 0726 hr 62.5 kg BMI 22.681

2020

My Weight 2020-01-28 0625 HR  62.6 kg BMI 22.717

My Weight 2020-02-28 0728 HR  62.3 kg BMI 22.608

My Weight 2020-03-28 0649 HR  61.4 kg BMI 22.281

My Weight 2020-04-28 0810 HR  62.0 kg BMI 22.499

My Weight 2020-05-28 0714 HR  62.3 kg BMI 22.608

My Weight 2020-06-28 0757 HR  60.2 kg BMI 21.846

My Weight 2020-07-28 0715 HR  61.6 kg BMI 22.354

My Weight 2020-08-28 0707 HR  61.1 kg BMI 22.173

My Weight 2020-09-28 0609 HR  60.8 kg BMI 22.064

My Weight 2020-10-28 0818 HR  60.7 kg BMI 22.027

My Weight 2020-11-28 0706 HR  60.9 kg BMI 22.100

My Weight 2020-12-28 0631 HR  60.5 kg BMI 21.955

2021

My Weight 2021-01-28 0638 HR  61.3 kg BMI 22.245

My Weight 2021-02-28 0741 HR  61.2 kg BMI 22.209

My Weight 2021-03-28 0659 HR  61.3 kg BMI 22.245

My Weight 2021-04-28 0659 HR  61.1 kg BMI 22.173

My Weight 2021-05-28 0618 HR  61.1 kg BMI 22.173

My Weight 2021-06-28 0604 HR  61.3 kg BMI 22.245

My Weight 2021-07-28 0642 HR  61.2 kg BMI 22.209

My Weight 2021-08-28 0653 HR  61.5 kg BMI 22.318

My Weight 2021-09-28 0618 HR  61.5 kg BMI 22.318

My Weight 2021-10-28 0549 HR  61.0 kg BMI 22.136

My Weight 2021-11-28 0630 HR  61.3 kg BMI 22.245

My Weight 2021-12-28 0528 HR  61.6 kg BMI 22.354

======================================

2022

My Weight 2022-01-28 0910 HR  61.1 kg  BMI 22.173

My Weight 2022-02-28 0642 HR  61.2 kg  BMI 22.209

My Weight 2022-03-28 0649 HR  61.4 kg  BMI 22.281

My Weight 2022-04-28 0649 HR  61.4 kg  BMI 22.281

My Weight 2022-05-28 0549 HR  61.0 kg  BMI 22.136

My Weight 2022-06-28 0549 HR  61.0 kg  BMI 22.136

My Weight 2022-07-28 0700 HR  60.6 kg  BMI 21.991

My Weight 2022-08-28 0640 HR  61.3 kg  BMI 22.245

My Weight 2022-09-28 0738 HR  61.7 kg  BMI 22.390

My Weight 2022-10-28 0708 HR  61.5 kg  BMI 22.318

My Weight 2022-11-28 0706 HR  60.9 kg BMI 22.100

My Weight 2022-12-28 0722 HR  61.1 kg  BMI 22.173

========

2023

My Weight 2023-01-28 0537 HR 60.9 kg BMI 22.100

My Weight 2023-02-28 0515 HR 61.4 kg  BMI 22.281

My Weight 2023-03-28 0606 HR  61.3 kg  BMI 22.245

My Weight 2023-04-28 0738 HR  61.3 kg  BMI 22.245

My Weight 2023-05-28 0721 HR  61.0 kg  BMI 22.136

My Weight 2023-06-28 0641 HR  61.2 kg  BMI 22.209

My Weight 2023-07-28 0700 HR  60.9 kg BMI 22.100

My Weight 2023-08-28 0655 HR  61.3 kg  BMI 22.245

My Weight 2022-09-28 0738 HR  61.7 kg  BMI 22.390

My Weight 2022-10-28 0708 HR  61.5 kg  BMI 22.318

My Weight 2023-11-28 0612 HR 61.4 kg  BMI 22.281

My Weight 2023-12-28 0734HR  61.3 kg  BMI 22.245


========

2024

My Weight 2024-01-28 0734 HR  61.3 kg BMI 22.245

My Weight 2024-02-28 0510 HR  61.6 kg BMI 22.354

My Weight 2024-03-28 0642 HR  60.9 kg BMI 22.100

My Weight 2024-04-28 0721 HR  61.1 kg BMI 22.173

My Weight 2024-05-28 0537 HR  61.3 kg BMI 22.245

My Weight 2024-06-28 0651 HR  61.5 kg BMI 22.318

My Weight 2024-07-28 0612 HR 61.4 kg  BMI 22.281

My Weight 2024-08-28 0747 HR  61.1 kg BMI 22.173

My Weight 2024-09-28 0640 HR  61.1 kg BMI 22.173

My Weight 2024-10-28 0546 HR  61.5 kg BMI 22.318

My Weight 2024-11-28 0706 HR 61.4 kg  BMI 22.281

My Weight 2024-12-28 0649 HR 61.9 kg BMI 22.463

=======================================

2025

My Weight 2025-01-28 0625 HR  61.6 kg BMI 22.354

My Weight 2025-02-28 0742 HR  61.5 kg BMI 22.318

My Weight 2025-03-28 0640 HR  61.6 kg BMI 22.354

My Weight 2025-04-28 0734 HR  61.7 kg  BMI 22.390

My Weight 2025-05-28 0738 HR  61.8 kg  BMI 22.427

My Weight 2025-06-28 0606 HR  62.6 kg  BMI 22.717

My Weight 2025-07-28 0757 HR  62.7 kg  BMI 22.753

My Weight 2025-08-28 0546 HR  62.6 kg, BMI 22.717

My Weight 2025-09-28 0540 HR  62.2 kg BMI 22.572

My Weight 2025-10-28 0516 HR  62.4 kg BMI 22.644

My Weight 2025-11-28 0810 HR  62.1 kg BMI 22.535

My Weight 2025-12-28 0702 HR  62.2 kg BMI 22.572

=========================

Note:

My current BMI is within the healthy range of 18.5 to 22.9.

For me, the range of healthy weight is 50.9786 kg (BMI = 18.5) to 63.10324 kg (BMI = 22.9).

People with BMI values of 23 kg/m2 (or 25 kg/m2 according to some sources) and above have been found to be at risk of developing heart disease and diabetes.

To be healthy, I must have a healthy weight.

Be as lean as possible without being underweight, as recommended by World Cancer Prevention Foundation, United Kingdom.

=================================

Note: On 2021-05-28, I removed the unimportant details of old records from My Weight Management Records.

=================================


Ref. WeightManagement



My Year 2025 Monthly Weight Checks all with healthy BMI in pictures (Jan 2025 to Dec 2025)



My Weight 2025-12-28



My Weight
2025-12-28
0702 HR 
62.2 kg
BMI 22.572

AI 人工智能: 韩咏梅:我和AI做朋友的2025年

韩咏梅:我和AI做朋友的2025年

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20251228-8020265?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2025-12-28

和AI打交道的这一年里,我发现自己需要的不再只是解答问题的能力,而是通过真实的观察和理解,发现新问题的能力,还要重新定义什么才是真正应该去解决的问题。


在一个饭局上,有位朋友突然提出一个问题:AI 能不能告诉我,今天上午发生的某个新闻事件?


我们当时并不确定,说不上来像ChatGPT这样的工具,是否已经能够抓取即时发生的新闻资讯。于是,大家索性当场试了一试。


结果它不仅能叙述那件事的经过,当我们请它分析这件事的背景与意义时,它也给出了一个相当有系统的论述。那种论述虽不至于完美,却完整、冷静,而且看起来颇有说服力。


那一刻,我忽然意识到,今年1月因为DeepSeek的出现,我们热热闹闹地谈论“如何进入生成式人工智能的时代”时,某些场景大家以为还需要一点时间才会真正出现。现在回头看,它们已经到来了。这些应用场景在我们不经意间,走进了饭局、走进了办公室,也走进了我们的思考方式里。


延伸阅读


何惜薇:时局动“荡” 需要一个“安”


陈能端:新年关键词


或许你有和我一样的担忧:AI用多了,我们会不会把独立思考的工作交给AI,大脑变得懒惰,渐渐地就变笨了?


前几天我刚巧浏览到著名教育心理学家李惠安(Angela Duckworth),今年5月份在宾夕法尼亚大学毕业典礼上发表演讲“AI时代未来教育的方向”时,向台下的毕业生抛出这个问题。全场很多学生举手,包括她自己。当她再问大家,有没有发现AI让自己变得聪明了一点?这时,几乎全场学生都举手。


研究发现,AI不只是像拐杖一样辅助用户,它也是一个教练,帮用户优化和提升想法,让一些模糊的概念变得清晰,甚至激发出创意。关键是使用者的心态。如果只是被动地接受,AI不会让你更聪明,但是如果你把它当成陪练员,你的学习效率会提高。


在同一个演讲中,李惠安教授引述她老师30多年前说的一句话:“图书馆里的知识都是免费的,但你得要自己带容器。”这句话说得简单而深刻,在AI时代,只要连得上网,知识更不稀缺,会稀缺的是“容器”——一个能装载知识、消化信息、形成判断的思想结构。


过去一年里,我经常用各种大语言模型的AI处理文字工作,它是我的阅读加速器、资料整理助手,也是我在思考新项目做头脑风暴时的伙伴。我还发现,每一次的迭代,它能回答和解决的事情就越多,对用户的帮助也越大。


传统上我们读书、学习、考试,都围绕在已有的知识中寻找答案。我们常被问一些已经大致上有答案的问题,有时是因为对方真的不会,有时只是因为对方想考考我们,于是我们求知若渴地去接受训练。无论是在学校、职场,或者专业领域里,我们被训练得能更快、更准确地找到正确答案。当AI能在数秒内解答几乎所有问题时,我们还需要什么知识?这是教育界最热烈讨论的话题之一。


和AI打交道的这一年里,我发现自己需要的不再只是解答问题的能力,而是通过真实的观察和理解,发现新问题的能力,还要重新定义什么才是真正应该去解决的问题。


让我举个艺术领域的例子,我们可以请AI创作一首巴洛克风格的新乐曲,AI凭着大量的机器学习和运算能力,完全懂得创作出一首新曲,好不好听另当别论。而我们人类如果提这种功能性的问题,只是让AI去重复一些它原本就很懂得演算的事,对整体人类的知识和福祉贡献不大。


如果思考的问题是:能否为天生失明者设计一种体验,让他们可以感受到画家莫奈笔下光影的色彩和情绪?这就能加深整体人类对“美”的理解,甚至创造出一种新的感官体验方式,提升人类对自己的认识。


懂得发问,是AI时代一个核心技能;另一个核心技能,我认为是沟通。在和AI沟通时,如果只问标准的简单问题,它只会给你简单或者言不及义的答案。为了与AI更好地协作出一个有意义的成品,自己必须把脑海中那些习以为常的概念,一层层拆解开,再用更清楚、更直接的方式说出来。我这才意识到,一直以来人与人之间的交流,可以依赖经验、背景或彼此的默契,一语带过想法,甚至有些事情还可以不言而喻。


一旦面对系统,所谓的“心领神会”不存在,如果不把问题描述清楚,AI要么理解错误,要么给你一个看似合理,却完全偏离本意的答案。


这是一种很奇特的反转。一开始我们以为人在和AI说话,是在训练机器,但是在更频繁的互动中,机器也在逼着我们重新学习如何表达,把复杂的概念翻译成真正能被理解的语言。


最近我和AI朋友的关系又有了变化,它现在也是我的“个人助理群”,每个助理分别帮我处理不同项目的资料和报告,从前这是只有富豪和大机构的重要管理层,才能享受到的服务。今天,只要一个付费的AI账号,就可以根据自己的需要定制自己要的服务。


我得坦白说,这篇专栏曾经尝试和AI共同创作,然而做功能性的报告,它完全可以胜任,一旦需要真实经历和个性化的表达,还是会露出“AI味”。所以,我们可以把事务性和功能性的工作交给AI,感性的诗和远方,还是得自己去体会和欣赏。


(作者是《联合早报》执行总编辑)

直面老与死 他们这样书写人生终章https://www.zaobao.com.sg/lifestyle/culture/story20251222-7987712?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

死亡:直面老与死 他们这样书写人生终章

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/lifestyle/culture/story20251222-7987712?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2025-12-22

面对生命的衰颓与终点,英国名编辑黛安娜·阿西尔、日本绘本作家佐野洋子与作家若竹千佐子,以及台湾作家郭强生,以晚年之书,为“老去”和“死亡”写下新注解。他们或犀利反思人生,或诙谐记录日常,或幽默描绘独居乐趣,或温柔直面逝去,启发读者重新思考生死。

生与死看似相对,两者却互相勾连,旁观他人死,让亲近的人在悼亡的同时,思索自己的生命。人活得越来越长,是要优雅、勇敢,还是诚实坦然地面对身心的衰颓?英国名编辑黛安娜·阿西尔与日本绘本作家佐野洋子殊途同归,写下晚年之书,为“老去”这件事下了新鲜注解,而今斯人已逝,她们的作品留给后人重新想象。63岁出道的若竹千佐子,具有自传性质的《我将独自前行》出道作被形容为“长者的东京女子图鉴”,出道即获文艺赏与芥川奖。台湾作家郭强生以全新散文《死亡可以是温柔的》,谈起和死亡近身相处的过程。


《问题是,我大概会活很久》(黛安娜·阿西尔著,谢静雯译)

《问题是,我大概会活很久》是名编辑戴安娜·阿西尔的传记,中文版由谢静雯翻译。(互联网)

出生英国伦敦的黛安娜·阿西尔(1917-2019)是20世纪的名编辑,与英语文坛极具影响力的作家多有交手,包括法国哲学家、作家西蒙娜·德·波伏娃和加拿大作家玛格丽特·阿特伍德,但大部分时间退居幕后,为人低调。

89岁这年,阿西尔出版了她的“晚年之书”——《问题是,我大概会活很久》,以犀利而通透的笔调,回望她的人生,包括经历过的亲密关系,迈入七旬却要照顾九旬母亲的经验,怀孕和流产的身体记忆,也始终在探讨“老去”这件事。现在的人更加长寿,如何接受和经历“年老”,将成为更多人的共同课题。本书不教人成功、优雅老去,不贩售成功学,不说教和提供解答,更多是真诚而冷静地反思与分享。

本着“活着不道歉,走时尽兴如愿”的心态,阿西尔以《问题是,我大概会活很久》开启另一种生命书写。

《痛快的日子》(佐野洋子著,闫雪译)

日本绘本作家佐野洋子在人生的最后阶段,写下《痛快的日子》。(互联网)

走进人生下半场,日本绘本作家发现自己的健忘愈发严重,后又罹患癌症,人生进入倒计时,只剩两年。看似陷入黑暗时期,但日常生活依旧要过,佐野洋子以《痛快的日子》记录了最后的日子,但不见消极不振。她写下各种老年生活的小确幸与小确不幸,包括饮食记忆,和朋友的相处,甚至迷恋韩剧而不可自拔。

虽然涉及老年、独居和死亡课题,《痛快的日子》直白而诙谐,展露了面对生命虽有无奈和不由自主,却可以豁达面对的心态。

《我将独自前行》(若竹千佐子著,杜海玲译)

《我将独自前行》由若竹千佐子著,杜海玲中译。(互联网)

出生于1954年的若竹千佐子,自孩提时期就想写小说,但一直没有如愿。直到55岁那年,丈夫去世,她一度陷入哀恸,后在儿子的建议下开始写作。

《我将独自前行》是她的出道之作,甫出版就获得文艺赏和芥川奖,创下两个月销售50万册的记录。故事讲述来自日本东北地区的桃子,在24岁那年因东京奥运,离开故乡、抛下婚事,独自来到陌生的东京。她在东京展开新的人生,努力工作,结婚生子,历经丈夫去世、儿女独立,转眼间50年过去。本来觉得年老就意味着失去和寂寞,桃子在日复一日的独居生活中,开始找到了一个人才能体会的乐趣。

具有自传性质的《我将独自前行》,被形容为长者的“东京女子图鉴”,以幽默清新的语调写老年心境,结合作者的现实经历,让人意识到人生永远没有“太晚开始”。

《死亡可以是温柔的》(郭强生)

台湾作家郭强生出版新散文《死亡可以是温柔的》。(互联网)

台湾联合报文学大奖、台北国际书展大奖、金鼎奖、金典奖得主郭强生,曾以《何不认真来悲伤》直视“悲伤”,写兄长和母亲去世,年过50独身的自己扛下照料父亲的责任。长照父亲10年,看见生命点滴流逝,终于耗光的过程,和“死亡”长期近身相处。父逝两年,郭强生出版全新散文《死亡可以是温柔的》,以“念”“思”和“愿”三者为框架,思考自己作为“大龄孤儿”,如何理解送别近亲,以及自己面对生与死的事。

郭强生意识到,双亲的离开就是思考自己尽头的开始。不强求为自己的生命延长时间,而是要为有限的时间注入生命。




ChatGPT: Everyone’s minion... and boss?

=====

ChatGPT: Everyone’s minion... and boss?
https://www.straitstimes.com/life/chatgpt-everyones-minion-and-boss

2025-12-27

Carmen Sim
The Straits Times 

SINGAPORE – Generative AI has become a verb. Go to a friend with a question, and they might shunt you with a “just ChatGPT it” or “Ask Chat”.

Verbing is that rare peak of success achieved by all endemic technology – like Google, Facebook and Grab – though none in the history of the internet have been so intensely personified by their users as OpenAI’s chatbot.

See: Chat, am I cooked? That’s Gen Z’s way of expressing doubt. It is also possible to review the machine as a writer or, more pointedly, a suspected ghostwriter of all e-mails, text messages longer than three lines and every wonky essay citation.

Our over-familiarity with Chat is a function of heavy use.

According to a Financial Times (FT) report, more than 18 billion messages are sent to ChatGPT every week.

In just three years since its launch, the service has been used by more than one in 10 people, a rate of adoption that outstrips that of the first decade of the internet, it added.

Other findings from the report based on data released by OpenAI showed that the software was primarily being used to support decision-making, with practical guidance – “how to” tutorials and creative ideation – accounting for the largest share of prompts.

Non-work-related messages had grown to more than 70 per cent of all usage, and information-seeking was the fastest-growing category in the last 12 months.

ChatGPT is now regularly being used to look for recipes, products, people and current events, in a direct threat to traditional search engines, reported FT.

Local headlines in 2025 captured how the bot is being consulted by teachers on lesson planning, newly-weds on interior design and lonely young people for life advice.

But as large language models become everyone’s boundlessly obliging co-pilot, it is not clear if the prevailing mood is one of confidence or anxiety.

Suicides in the US in 2025 were blamed on artificial intelligence (AI), after the deaths of Americans Zane Shamblin, 23, and Adam Raine, 16. Both left behind extensive chat logs with ChatGPT that revealed the software’s dangerous “mental health advice”.

Then, there was the meltdown over AI turning brains to muck after preliminary findings from a Massachusetts Institute of Technology study in June concluded that people using tools like ChatGPT became lazier with each use.

There is also the irony of local Gen Z using AI more frequently but feeling threatened by the technology in their jobs.

Close to half (49 per cent) of Gen Z respondents here believe AI will have a considerable impact on their jobs in the next five years – although only a small proportion (4 per cent) of them said they expect to lose their jobs to AI, according to a survey of more than 2,500 Singapore residents by recruitment agency Randstad in June.

Even so, there are bright spots. A 25-year-old generative AI engineer and graduate of the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) Akshaya Rajesh has rolled out the Feynman bot, named after American physicist Richard Feynman.

Unlike most popular AI chatbots used by students to get instant answers, the Feynman bot flips the script by asking the questions and expecting answers instead.

Anecdotally, the bot’s serviceable coding skills are being put to use by laymen gleefully creating their own websites as a kind of creative outlet.

These are reminders that AI is still a tool capable of good. How these outcomes balance out against potential harms is worth watching in the years to come.

More On This Topic

2025 Objectified: 15 lifestyle objects that captured the public imagination

A fake friend? AI companions are exactly that

Carmen Sin is a journalist at The Straits Times, covering fashion, beauty and culture.

🔥美国斩杀线在明处,中国斩杀线在暗处|同样是亚洲,生存底线差别竟那么大|新加坡斩杀线|马来西亚斩杀线|台湾斩杀线|人生失败成本|35岁失业|医疗...

Saturday, December 27, 2025

Leasehold homes 99 years: Living on a 99-year clock in Singapore’s leasehold homes

Living on a 99-year clock in Singapore’s leasehold homes

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/living-on-a-99-year-clock-in-singapores-leasehold-homes

2025-12-27

Joyce Lim
Senior Correspondent 
The Straits Times

====
====

SINGAPORE - My condo is a leasehold one, bought 20 years ago at a price I could afford.

I don’t think I will outlive the 99-year lease. That thought doesn’t bother me, especially when the unit has already served its purpose as a home, an investment and a place of memories.

I live in Tanjong Rhu, where most developments sit on 99-year leases. Today, the value of my condo has appreciated threefold. Along the way, friends have urged me to sell it as the lease runs down. But I have no plans to.

I like the walks in the neighbourhood, the familiarity of faces in the lift lobby, the ease of getting to the beach and to the city from where I live. The home still suits my lifestyle and I enjoy living there. That, to me, is value enough.

My thinking may put me in a minority on a topic that affects many of us. Most households in Singapore live in Housing Board flats, not private condominiums. But condos, too, have leases that end, and the questions about what a home is for and what we hope to leave behind are the same ones that HDB flat owners face.

Once a lease expires, the land goes back to the state. As time runs out in the later years of a lease, the prices are likely to soften.

But between the day you collect your keys and the day the lease runs out lie several decades of living. In those years, a property can give you more than capital gains. It can offer stability, community and the daily familiarity that never appears in a valuation report.

A couple who bought an HDB flat in a mature estate 30 years ago may have seen a new MRT line arrive, watched coffee shops and retail shops multiply, and built up a network of neighbours who help one another.

The flat’s remaining lease today may worry them. But the flat has already delivered decades of use and, in many cases, paper gains they never imagined when they first moved in.

First-generation flat owners in older estates have, in fact, more options than they sometimes acknowledge.

Many bought their HDB flats at modest prices in the 1970s and 1980s. As towns matured and amenities improved, resale values rose. Some owners sold and used the gains to move to larger flats, or to newer units in other estates. Others chose to right-size into smaller flats closer to amenities or nearer to work or medical facilities.

The point is that not everyone must upgrade or cash out, but that system created windows of opportunity.

Home owners who were not emotionally tied to their home could, at various points, have sold their unit when the lease was still relatively fresh and prices were high, then bought a newer flat with a longer remaining lease, or even a small freehold condo if they were willing to trade location and space.

Those who valued the familiar environment and social ties might have chosen to stay put, even if they knew that resale prices might flatten or fall as the lease aged.

The issue of inheritance

You cannot change the 99-year framework, but you can decide how and when to act within it.

Even today, there are HDB flat owners in older estates sitting on substantial gains. A flat bought for under $100,000 decades ago may now be worth several times that amount. Some owners will eventually sell and help the next generation with down payments on their own homes, even if the flat itself is not passed down.

The choices available to a Tanjong Rhu condo owner and a Toa Payoh flat owner may differ in scale, but the underlying trade-offs are similar. Tenure versus location, space versus price, profit versus attachment.

In many Asian families, property is seen as legacy, not just shelter. Parents often think about what they can leave for their children.

This is where some owners want the best of both worlds, which may be hard to achieve.

The Voluntary Early Redevelopment Scheme (VERS), for example, aims to facilitate urban renewal. When it is rolled out, owners of ageing flats in certain sites may vote for the Government to buy back their homes. The scheme is voluntary and not meant to be a wealth-generating programme, the authorities have clarified.

Some owners will be glad to salvage some value from the flats before these plummet on account of the short remaining leases. Others will eye high payouts and it may be hard for them to accept the gap between what they are offered and what they expect. As with all trade-offs, something has to give.

It is true that, for many households, the flat is their single largest store of wealth. Selling can feel like giving up security and holding on can feel like fulfilling an obligation to the next generation.

Yet expectations between generations are changing.

A friend of mine owns a flat in Marine Parade but now lives with her children in a private property. Her children have urged her to sell the 50-year-old flat, but she has refused. Her children tell her that they don’t need it and, in fact, they feel it would create more paperwork for them when their parents pass on.

But to my friend, the flat gives her something to fall back on if she ever needs it and something she can leave to the next generation.

Calculating value

I have chosen to see my Tanjong Rhu condo primarily as a home for my lifetime. If it ends up being useful to the next generation, that will be a bonus.

For my neighbours, it may make more sense to sell. Many home owners have walked away with handsome profits. A two-bedder leasehold condo unit in the area bought for under $500,000 in the early 2000s can fetch more than triple that today.

At Lakeview Estate in Upper Thomson, almost 50 years into its lease, a 1,614 sq ft unit that sold for $620,000 in 1997 changed hands at $1.79 million in March 2024, data from the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) showed.

A unit of similar size in 48-year-old Lagoon View in Marine Parade sold at $1.88 million in May 2025. The seller had paid $450,000 for the unit in 2003. Even Loyang Valley, with just 56 years left on its lease, has seen strong resale prices in these two years.

There are also people willing to buy into very short leases, which means sellers can still find buyers.

In Bedok, a 3,208 sq ft landed house in Jalan Chempaka Kuning with 10 years left on its lease, was sold to an HDB upgrader for $480,000 in August 2024. It’s like paying around $4,000 each month for the property until the lease runs out. Compared with renting, owning a short-lease landed property can be cheaper. Buyers get the lifestyle of living in a landed property at a fraction of the cost.

It’s not unlike the car market. Some people want brand-new vehicles with the latest features. Others happily buy a nine-year-old car with one year left on its certificate of entitlement. The depreciation is low, the upfront cost affordable. Some people may still feel it’s worth it.

So where does this leave leasehold homes?

The law is clear – leases expire and land is recycled. VERS, if it comes, is a bonus, not a solution. Owners who want to lock in value can act earlier; those who hold on should do so with their eyes open.

The key is to recognise that while you cannot control the rules of the system, you can control how you move within it.

If maximising financial value and leaving an asset behind are your main priorities, it may make sense to sell earlier in the lease, realise gains and buy a younger property, whether it is a smaller freehold apartment or a newer HDB flat.

For me, the value of my home lies not just in how much it is worth on paper, or in what might happen after I am gone and the lease runs down further. It lies in the life it has housed, and in the years it still has to offer, even as the number on the deed continues to fall.

  • Joyce Lim covers Singapore’s property market and redevelopment trends.

Lawrence Wong's Books read in 2025

Information source:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lawrence-wong-15728a18_the-holiday-period-is-a-good-time-to-catch-activity-7410485627483451392-P44z?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAABiCd3kBLtpl0SShj97Y32D9_xkLs_-HQhc&utm_campaign=whatsapp

=====

Friday, December 26, 2025

🔥别再被讨厌了!中国游客必学的旅游法则|中国人的百年困局|同样讲中文,新加坡为何从未踩坑|看懂这套千年思维模式,你就懂中国人苦难的底层逻辑|做个...

Do Not Let the Bright Moon Shine into the Ditch — Entrust Your True Heart to a Real Person

Do Not Let the Bright Moon Shine into the Ditch — Entrust Your True Heart to a Real Person

Translated by ChatGPT 

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20251225-8011120?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2025-12-25

By Chen Zhixian

Recently, news that a 32-year-old Japanese woman, Noguchi Yurina, held a symbolic wedding with an artificial intelligence (AI) companion sparked heated discussion online. Although the wedding has no legal effect, it included vows and a ceremony. Some find it absurd, while others dismiss it with a laugh, but this incident perhaps should not be viewed merely as a piece of curiosity-driven news.

This Japanese woman is not unable to distinguish between reality and the virtual world. She clearly knows that the other party is not a real person and cannot shoulder responsibilities in real life. Yet she still chooses to place her emotions and happiness in this relationship, because in her interactions with the AI companion, she feels companionship, understanding, and joy. It is a relationship that is predictable, free from rejection, and without the worry of the other party leaving.

Does this reflect a kind of anxiety and caution among contemporary young people when facing intimate relationships? They yearn to be understood, accepted, and loved, yet they also fear rejection, loss of control, and hurt in real relationships. Being with an AI companion seems to allow them to satisfy their emotional needs in a safe, controllable space, without having to face the responsibilities and adjustments that accompany intimate relationships.

I have read Intimate Relationships by Christopher Moon. The book points out that intimate relationships consist of three core elements: intimacy, passion, and commitment. In marriage or long-term relationships, passion may fade over time, but it is intimacy and commitment that sustain stability and happiness. This made me realize that if one’s true feelings are placed only in immediate emotional gratification or a sense of security, the relationship will ultimately be difficult to sustain; entrusting one’s heart to the right person and the right relationship is the true foundation of intimacy.

Connecting this to reality, I cannot help but think of the young people around me. I once asked secondary school students what their ideal partner looked like, and some even produced two-dimensional characters as their answers. It is not that they could not give reasons; rather, in their eyes, such ideal partners are not only visually appealing but also able to understand them, will not hurt them, and can even provide a sense of existence, all without having to bear the complexity and risks of real relationships. Whether sincere or in jest, such answers still gave me pause for thought. It also made me realize that we have no textbooks teaching students how to manage intimate relationships, nor clear guidance on how to view love and marriage. So how should young people correctly understand and face intimate relationships?

Returning to the news of the Japanese woman holding a wedding with an AI companion, I believe this is like a mirror reflecting the hesitation and defensiveness of contemporary young people toward intimate relationships. In an era of highly developed AI, emotions are becoming increasingly “customizable”: chatbots respond at any time, do not contradict people, and do not create conflict. For young people who are not yet ready to face the complexity of real relationships, virtual relationships seem to become a form of solace in a high-pressure society, allowing them to experience companionship and emotional interaction in a controllable environment.

When a reporter interviewed the Japanese woman’s father, he admitted that he initially found it difficult to understand his daughter’s decision, but eventually chose to respect her choice, saying, “Only she knows her own joys and sorrows; as long as she is happy, that is enough.” This understanding is puzzling and even vaguely unsettling. Does parental retreat also mean that they are gradually losing the ability to intervene in and guide the emotional world of the younger generation?

Not long ago, I published an article titled “Do Not Entrust Your True Heart to the Other Side of the Screen” in Lianhe Zaobao · Interaction Station, mentioning a friend who was hurt after entrusting her emotions to a romance scammer. Whether romance scammers or seemingly gentle and reliable AI, in essence, both are incapable of bearing the responsibilities and commitments of real relationships.

Marriage is not an emotional experience, nor is it a relationship that exists solely for self-gratification. It requires a real partner and the willingness of both parties to take responsibility. In this era of continuous technological advancement, we may need even more to remind ourselves: true feelings are precious and should be entrusted to relationships that can respond, take responsibility, and grow together, rather than to a program that will never reject you.

The author is an education professional.

陈芝贤:莫让明月照沟渠 且把真心寄真人

陈芝贤:莫让明月照沟渠 且把真心寄真人

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20251225-8011120?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app


2025-12-25


近日,日本一名32岁女子野口由里奈与人工智能(AI)伴侣举行象征性婚礼的新闻,在网络上引起热议。婚礼虽无法律效力,却有誓言、有仪式。有人觉得荒唐,也有人一笑置之,但这起事件,或许不该只被当成一则猎奇新闻来看。

这名日本女子并非无法分辨现实与虚拟的界限。她清楚对方并非真人,无法承担现实生活中的责任。然而,她仍选择将情感与幸福寄托在这段关系中,因为在与AI伴侣的互动中,她感受到陪伴、被理解与快乐。那是一段可预测、不会被拒绝,也不必担心对方离开的关系。

这是否反映了当代年轻人在面对亲密关系时的一种焦虑与谨慎?他们渴望被理解、被接纳、被爱,却也害怕现实关系中的拒绝、失控与伤害。与AI伴侣相处,仿佛能让他们在一个安全、可控的空间里满足自身的情感需求,不必面对亲密关系中随之而来的责任与磨合。

我读过克里斯多福·孟的《亲密关系》。书中指出,亲密关系由三个核心元素组成:亲密、激情与承诺。在婚姻或长期关系中,激情可能随时间消退,但亲密与承诺的元素,才能维系关系的稳固与幸福。这让我意识到,若真心只寄托在即时的情绪满足或安全感之上,关系终究难以长久;把心交给对的人、对的关系,才是亲密关系真正的根基。

结合现实,我不禁想起身边的年轻人。我曾问中学生,心目中的梦中情人是什么样子,有些学生甚至拿出二次元角色作为答案。他们并非说不出理由,而是在他们眼中,这样的梦中情人不仅外型夺目,更能理解自己、不会伤害自己,甚至能带来存在感,同时也不必承担现实关系的复杂与风险。无论是真心还是玩笑,这样的回答仍让我深思。这也让我意识到:我们没有教科书教导学生如何经营亲密关系,也没有明确的指导教他们如何看待爱情与婚姻。那么,年轻人应当如何以正确的方式理解和面对亲密关系呢?

回到日本女子与AI伴侣举行婚礼的新闻,我认为这像是一面镜子,映照出当代年轻人对亲密关系的犹豫与防备。在AI高度发展的时代,情感变得越来越“可定制”:聊天机器人随时回应、不违背人、不制造冲突。对尚未准备好面对真实关系复杂性的年轻人而言,虚拟关系仿佛成为高压社会中的一份慰藉,让他们在可控的环境中体验陪伴与情感互动。

当记者访问该日本女子的父亲时,他坦言自己起初难以理解女儿的决定,但最终选择尊重她的选择,“冷暖自知,只要她开心就好”。这份理解让人不解,甚至隐约感到不安。父母的退让,是否也意味着他们对年轻一代的情感世界,逐渐失去介入与引导的能力?

不久前,我在《联合早报·交流站》发表过一篇文章《别把真心交给屏幕那一端》,提到朋友因将情感托付给爱情骗子,而受到伤害。无论是爱情骗子,还是看似温柔可靠的AI,本质上都无法承担现实关系中的责任与承诺。

婚姻不是一场情绪体验,更不是一段只为自我感受而存在的关系。它需要真实的对方,也需要双方愿意承担责任。在这个技术不断进步的时代,我们或许更须要提醒自己:真心很珍贵,应该寄托在能够回应、承担与共同成长的关系之中,而不是一个永远不会拒绝你的程序。

作者是教育工作者

Singapore in the sixties from Tim Thomas SCE


 

Thursday, December 25, 2025

帝國開疆拓土?

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Sunday, December 21, 2025

No rush more care: Senior-friendly tours catch on as Singapore ages*.

-------
*No rush, more care: Senior-friendly tours catch on as Singapore ages*

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/community/no-rush-more-care-senior-friendly-tours-catch-on-as-spore-ages

2025-12-21

SINGAPORE – Whenever wanderlust hits retired human resources professional Tan Tock Chen, the 77-year-old turns to a group of experts in the business of crafting holidays for seniors.

This includes boutique travel agencies like Follow Me Japan and Intriq Journey, which can customise slower-paced itineraries for smaller groups of eight to 10 people.

These itineraries not only factor in more toilet breaks and rest stops, but also emphasise the importance of good food, said Mr Tan.

“Unlike younger travellers, we are not into rushing around and buying clothing, shoes or little souvenirs, he said. “We are more interested in local culture and snacks.”

As Singapore’s seniors grow in numbers, some travel agencies like ISE Travel said they see strong growth potential in targeting this segment, given that more of them are staying active for longer, while having the financial resources to explore the world on their own terms.

But operators who want to tap the silver market must understand the traveller profile, including that some in a group may have mobility or stamina limitations due to medical issues, said ISE Travel managing director Jimmy Ooi.

“They need to feel confident and safe travelling with peers, so that they can enjoy themselves and the social interaction as a group,” he added.

Such tours are typically capped at fewer than 25 people to ensure closer attention while still benefiting from economies of scale. Daily itineraries are shorter, usually starting at 9am and ending around 4pm.

Inter-city commutes are also kept under five hours if possible, he added. Otherwise, stopovers to stretch one’s legs and to get snacks will be included.

Mr Ooi said he entered the silver travel market in earnest in 2022, after he was contacted by Silver Horizon Travel Co-operative, a volunteer-run social enterprise for seniors who love travelling.

Founded in 2012, the co-op organises trips for seniors, by seniors. Dues start at $130 for a lifelong associate membership, and the society currently has over 700 members.

The co-op’s chairman, Mr Victor Seow, said about 60 to 70 new members join the society each year, and that members’ ages range from 40 to over 90.

He expects membership numbers to pick up further as Singapore looks set to become a super-aged society in 2026. This is as the co-op is actively involved in organising tours and events, such as ensuring reasonable wake-up calls, and that walking tours are manageable.

Members of Silver Horizon Travel Co-operative visiting the east coast of Malaysia in April 2024. The co-op welcomes about 60 to 70 new members each year. PHOTO: SILVER HORIZON TRAVEL CO-OPERATIVE LTD

“The tours themselves are a means to an end,” said Mr Seow, a 67-year-old retiree. “At the end of the day, we want our members to form friendships so that they can take care of each other, and to prevent social isolation.”

Mr Seow noted that members have gone on to form walking groups that meet weekly at places such as the Botanic Gardens. Others have volunteered together, such as to distribute goods to needy residents in neighbourhoods such as Jalan Kukoh.

“The best feedback we can get is that they have their own group of friends in the cooperative, and they go out together on their own for meals and even their own travel,” he said.

Mr Ooi said that since it began working with Silver Horizon Travel, his agency has expanded its senior-focused offerings to include cooking classes, wellness sessions, nature walks, craft workshops and skills demonstrations.

Members of Silver Horizon Travel Co-operative in Aomori, Japan, in October 2024. PHOTO: SILVER HORIZON TRAVEL CO-OPERATIVE LTD

It also offers tours with unique experiences, such as overnight stays in traditional abodes like Mongolian gers and Hakka tulou. Even so, these accommodations must offer modern amenities that are comparable with that of a hotel, he added.

Mr Tan, the retired HR executive, said he has been on at least four tours since he joined Silver Horizon Travel in 2013, about a year after the co-op was started. His next trip with his co-op friends is in March 2026, to Shikoku island in Japan.

“I made a lot of friends on these tours, and we share knowledge on exercise and keeping healthy,” he said.

  • Chin Soo Fang is senior correspondent at The Straits Times, covering a wide range of topics including community, politics, social issues, consumer, culture and heritage.