Sunday, April 5, 2026

Protect yourself from scams

*Protect yourself from scams*

The police urge the public to practise good cyber hygiene, such as checking with official sources like the ScamShield App or the 24/7 ScamShield Helpline (1799) whenever they are unsure if something is a scam. 

*Government officials will never do these things over a phone call:*

1. Ask you to transfer money or valuables

2. Ask you to install apps from unofficial app stores

3. Ask you to disclose bank log-in details

4. Transfer your call to the police

Information source:

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/she-transferred-almost-20000-to-police-under-threat-of-being-detained

Is Euthanasia Something That Can Never Be Discussed?

Is Euthanasia Something That Can Never Be Discussed?

Translated by ChatGPT

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260405-8836069?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-04-05

Lianhe Zaobao (联合早报)

Author: Lu Lishan (卢丽珊)

=====

The truth about death is that it does not always come swiftly; more often, it slowly consumes a person, from the body and physical functions to the will to live, with the process varying in length.

On March 26, a 25-year-old Spanish girl, Castillo, won a lawsuit that had lasted nearly two years against her father, who had tried to stop her from seeking euthanasia, and she was able to end her short life as she wished. Even in Europe, where euthanasia is legal, the case sparked intense controversy—first because of her age, and second because of the involvement and breakdown of familial relationships. The twists and turns of the case have prompted deeper reflection on euthanasia.

A life of 25 years may sound short, but in the eyes of the individual, it had already reached its end. She had a difficult childhood and spent most of her time in foster care. As an adult, she suffered multiple instances of sexual assault. Three years ago, a failed suicide attempt left her permanently paralyzed. The girl said she “only wanted to leave peacefully and end the pain.”

In Spain, street interviews conveyed shock and disappointment among the public. Some viewed it as a great disgrace to society, believing that if such cases had received earlier attention and care, extreme outcomes like euthanasia among young people might have been prevented. Spanish religious organizations and scholars also issued strong condemnations, arguing that the incident exposed society’s neglect of disadvantaged groups, and called for strengthened support services and adjustments to euthanasia laws.

A joint statement issued by Spanish church bishops the day before her death said that her experience reflected “the overlap of personal suffering and systemic shortcomings, posing a challenge to society as a whole.” However, under the premise of valuing individualism and respecting human rights, the girl’s personal wishes ultimately took precedence over everything, making euthanasia her final exit from life.


Related reading

The UK Parliament passes a euthanasia bill


In 2021, euthanasia was legalized in Spain. Adults suffering from terminal illness or severe chronic disability can apply for assisted death through the public healthcare system.

If the Spanish girl’s death is unsettling, the situation in the Netherlands—the first country to legalize euthanasia (2002)—is also shocking. Data from the Dutch euthanasia review committee last year showed that nearly 10,000 people underwent euthanasia in 2024, a 10% increase from the previous year. The number of people with mental illness increased by 60%, accounting for 5.8% of all deaths nationwide.

Currently, countries that have legalized active euthanasia or assisted suicide are mainly concentrated in Europe and the Americas. The first countries to legalize euthanasia were the Netherlands and Belgium, followed by Luxembourg, Canada, Spain, Colombia, and New Zealand, which have successively passed laws permitting active euthanasia or assisted death. Several states in Australia have also implemented related policies.

Writing about euthanasia carries immense weight, as it touches on the many complexities of life and death. There was a moment, reflecting on the girl’s death, when I felt fortunate to live in Singapore, where what I see as such a regrettable event would not occur. Yet, upon further thought, is it truly a “regret,” or does it actually address the most genuine needs of someone in her unique situation? Not discussing or accepting euthanasia may be the current social environment, but it may not always remain so.

Living in a country where euthanasia is not legal, my views are naturally shaped by society and policy, and I understand the broader emphasis on end-of-life care systems. Emotionally, I cannot accept euthanasia; rationally, however, it is not a monstrous concept and has its reasonable place.

As I write this column, an elderly relative in her seventies, who had suffered from cancer for over 25 years, has just turned into wisps of smoke at Mandai Crematorium. In the final years of repeated torment from cancer, she gradually lost her sight and hearing, yet remained mentally clear, repeatedly asking herself: Why am I still not dead? Why can’t I die sooner?

She, who once excelled in music, chess, calligraphy, painting, and sewing in her later years, slowly became a human ruin because of illness. Even though she was surrounded by children and grandchildren, at her most vulnerable moments she once asked me to help sell her house and quietly take her to Europe for euthanasia. Of course, no matter how filial a child is, it is impossible to hear the suppressed cry of one’s own mother; she could not possibly tell her children her true wish.

The essence of life is “being born toward death”; everyone shares the same end. Yet the truth of death is that it does not necessarily come swiftly. More often, it slowly consumes a person—from the body and physical functions to the will to live—with varying durations. In Singapore, living under the shadow of death and the endless torment of illness has become a passive compromise for many unfortunate individuals. I could not fulfill that elderly relative’s request—that is my current stance on euthanasia, though I fully understand and sympathize.

To live—whether well or poorly—is a basic attitude; otherwise, it would be seen as belittling life and desecrating the divine. But is that necessarily true?

At the beginning of last year, my mother was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. After half a year of chemotherapy proved ineffective, she passed away two months later. Looking back at the blank pages of my diary during those months, I saw a few words written on February 8: “Mother said: I am suffering very much, please let me go.”

It turns out that even those nearing death plead emotionally for their loved ones to let go and allow them to leave. Without our “permission,” they cannot bear—or dare—to go. The cruel truth is that even when we see our loved ones in such pain, we who remain alive still silently, almost brutally, hope that they will continue to live despite the suffering—for our sake.

Euthanasia has only a 24-year history of legalization in some countries. In Singapore, the government opposes euthanasia in order to protect the dignity of life. However, individuals may sign an Advance Medical Directive (AMD), choosing not to undergo life-sustaining treatment that prolongs suffering when critically ill.

On the issue of euthanasia, I have come to feel more than ever the vast differences between Eastern and Western societies. Perhaps this is also why we must begin to seriously reflect on the questions of life and death, and take greater control over them.

(The author is a writer/businessperson.)

卢丽珊:永远不能谈的安乐死

卢丽珊:永远不能谈的安乐死?

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260405-8836069?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-04-05


死亡的真相是它不一定来得痛快,更多时候会慢慢吞噬一个人,从肉体、身体机能到生存意识,历程长短不一。

3月26日,25岁的西班牙女孩卡斯蒂洛战胜与父亲欲阻止她寻求安乐死长达近两年的官司,如愿结束短暂的一生。即使是在安乐死合法的欧洲,还是引起极大争议,一来是当事人的年龄,其次是牵扯人伦关系的介入及挫败,事件峰回路转,无不掀起对安乐死更深刻的反思。


25年的生命,听起来短暂,实则在当事人眼中已是到了尽头。她童年坎坷,大部分时间是在寄养机构度过,成年后数次遭遇性侵,三年前自杀不遂导致终身瘫痪,女孩表示“只想平静地离开,结束痛苦”。

在西班牙,街头访问无不传达民众的震惊和失望,有者认为这是对社会的奇耻大辱,若这类个案提早得到关注和关怀,兴许就能防止年轻人安乐死的极端情况。西班牙宗教组织和学者也严苛谴责,认为事件曝露社会对不幸群体的漠视,呼吁加强相关服务和调整安乐死法令。


西班牙教会的主教在她死前一天发出联合声明说,她的遭遇反映“个人苦难与制度缺陷的叠加,这给整个社会提出挑战”。然而在崇尚个人主义和尊重人权的前提下,女孩的个人意愿始终凌驾于一切,以致安乐死成为她结束人生的终极出口。

延伸阅读

英国议会投票通过安乐死法案

2021年,安乐死在西班牙合法化,成年人患有绝症或严重慢性残疾,可向公共医疗体系申请协助死亡。

如果西班牙女孩的死亡令人不安,第一个合法化安乐死的国家荷兰(2002年)的情况亦令人震惊。荷兰安乐死审查委员会去年的资料显示,2024年有近万人接受安乐死,比前年增加一成,患有心理疾病的人数增加六成,占全国死亡率的5.8%。

目前,全球主动安乐死或协助自杀合法化的国家主要集中在欧洲和美洲。首批将安乐死合法化的国家是荷兰和比利时,随后卢森堡、加拿大、西班牙、哥伦比亚以及新西兰也相继通过法律,允许主动安乐死或协助死亡。澳大利亚多个州也已实行相关政策。

写安乐死下笔千斤重,触动生死议题的万缕千端——女孩的死有一刻让我庆幸生活在新加坡,不会发生上述我眼中的憾事。然而话说回来,这真是“憾事”,而不是切中女孩特殊案例最真实的需求?不谈论、不接受安乐死也许是目前的社会环境,但是它不一定永远如此。

生活在一个安乐死不合法的国家,我的观念自然受到社会和政策的形塑,理解国家更注重临终关怀机制的大叙述。感情上,我不能接受安乐死,理性观之,安乐死并不是洪水猛兽,有它合理的存在意义。

在写本专栏的当下,一位七旬长辈罹患癌症逾25载,在万礼火葬场化作轻烟缕缕。在癌症反复折磨她的最后几年,她越发看不见,听不到,只有意识清醒地反复问自己:为什么我还没有死,为什么还不快点死?

那个曾经晚年琴棋书画和缝纫了得的她,因病慢慢沦为人形废墟。即使儿孙满堂,在她心灵最脆弱的时候曾求我帮她卖掉房子,静悄悄带她去欧洲安乐死。当然,再孝顺的孩子都无法听到自己母亲的闷声呐喊,她不可能告诉孩子真实的心愿。

生命的本质是“生而向死”,谁的终点都一样,然则死亡的真相是它不一定来得痛快,更多时候会慢慢吞噬一个人,从肉体、身体机能到生存意识,历程长短不一。在新加坡,于死亡阴影和疾病无休止折磨中生存,成为许多不幸者的被动妥协。我不能满足那位长辈的请求,就是我对安乐死目前的态度,虽然我彻底理解和同情。

活着,好活歹活,都是一种基本态度,反之就是轻视生命,亵渎上苍。然而,真一定如此吗?

我母亲去年初因罹患胰脏癌,经过半年化疗后无效,之后再过了两个月后离开我们。回看那几个月空白的日记,我看到2月8日一栏几个字:妈妈说:我很辛苦,你让我走吧。

原来即使快走的人,也在心灵上哀求亲人放下她,让她走。没有我们的“许可”,她连走都不舍、不敢。残忍的是,我们生者即使面对亲人那么痛苦,却始终默默近乎残暴地希望她即使痛苦也要活着,为我们活着。

安乐死在一些国家的合法化只有24年历史,在新加坡,政府反对安乐死以保护生命的尊严;然而,人们可以签署预先医疗指示(AMD),选择病危时不做延长痛苦的生命维持治疗。

在安乐死的议题上,我前所未有地感受东方和西方社会原来有那么大的差异。或许这也是我们为什么须开始认真思考生和死的课题,掌握主动权。

(作者是文字工作者/商人)

Saturday, April 4, 2026

新闻人间:全红婵-冠军背后的眼泪

新闻人间:全红婵-冠军背后的眼泪
https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/china/story20260404-8835575?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app


2026-04-04

吕爱丽

======

被视为近年来中国跳水最具代表性天才选手之一的全红婵,近日在接受专访时谈及过去一年的心路历程,不禁在镜头前哽咽落泪。令她难过的,并非跳水台上的得失,而是来自部分网民的攻击与指责。

这名刚刚度过19岁生日的两届奥运冠军,在被问及如何用一个字概括2025年时,她给出的答案是“牛”。回望几乎让她萌生退意的这一年,全红婵坦言:“能坚持下来,我觉得(自己)已经很厉害了。”

她回忆,在结束巴黎奥运会于2024年底重返国家队后,不少人见到她的第一反应都是惊讶:“怎么胖成这样?”在随后数月的世界杯比赛期间,她反复听到的评价全离不开一个“胖”字。

正值容易产生体重焦虑的青春期,全红婵和许多同龄女孩一样,对身材格外敏感。她说自己“连喝口水都会变重”,在这样的心理压力下,全红婵常常把自己包裹在长裤长袖之中,因为她“接受不了那样的自己”。

在这样的状态下,她在跳水台上也逐渐产生强烈的恐惧感。每当纵身跃下的那一瞬间,她总以为自己会重重坠落。在2025年的多站世界杯比赛中,她在女子10米台单人项目接连获得亚军,未能延续以往的优势。

延伸阅读

时隔183天复出首秀夺冠 全红婵赛后发文:我真棒

中国体育总局长:大力整治体育饭圈乱象

主持人此时流露出心疼,她却反过来安慰一句“没事”,随即别过头去,压抑情绪。

全红婵7岁开始学习跳水,11岁进入广东省队,13岁入选国家队,14岁便在东京奥运会上夺得女子10米跳台金牌,一战成名。“水花消失术”由此成为她最广为人知的标签。她在巴黎奥运会成功卫冕,并在同年的多哈世界游泳锦标赛上,实现了奥运会、世锦赛和世界杯单人及双人项目的金牌大满贯。

这样的成绩早已让许多人望尘莫及。然而,长期投入高强度训练、日复一日坚持付出的全红婵,却认为胜出只是“侥幸”,而将失利归因于“自己不够努力”。

正如曾为中国赢得第一枚世锦赛跳水金牌的“跳水女王”高敏所言,全红婵在尚未完全理解奥运会对一名运动员一生意味着什么的时候,便已站上最高领奖台,成为奥运冠军。

在东京奥运会夺金后,围绕全红婵的关注迅速增加——企业提出赠送房产与奖金,多地景区发出邀约,生病的家人也得到当地官方慰问。与此同时,随之而来的探访、直播与“打卡式旅游”,也逐渐打破她家人原本平静的生活。

过多且难以回避的目光与期待,叠加青春期的身体变化,让全红婵渐渐失去对跳水最初的那份轻松与投入。她在采访中坦言,自己“在跳(水)的时候并不快乐”;面对镜头,她语气近乎恳求地说:“希望不要再骂我了,不要骂我的家人,也不要骂我的朋友。”

全红婵的经历也引发舆论讨论。《人民日报》“人民锐评”指出,在畸形“饭圈文化”中,偶像在上升期容易被过度追捧、陷入非理性狂热,而一旦表现未达预期,又可能迅速遭遇反噬式网络暴力。

评论认为,理性的关注应回到对个人专业能力与人格的尊重,避免陷入“捧杀”与“棒杀”的情绪循环。

去年11月,尽管因伤长达183天没有参加正式比赛,期间还多次因体重问题遭外界议论,但全红婵在伤愈复出后的首场比赛中,仍夺得双人项目金牌。她依然赢得比赛,但关于“赢”的方式,已很难再用“侥幸”来解释。至于未来,她只说“走一步看一步”。一些问题,仍没有答案。

Friday, April 3, 2026

联合早报社论 (2026-04-03):电费上涨背后是不可知的风暴

社论:电费上涨背后是不可知的风暴
https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/editorial/story20260403-8836086?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-04-03


新加坡能源集团本周宣布上调第二季的住家电价,电力零售商已经上调电价,渡轮、私召车、航空公司等也纷纷宣布加收燃料相关费用。能源市场管理局指出,未来几个季度的电价都可能受到中东战争影响而出现更大幅度的上涨。

本地进入季风转换期的闷热时节,冷气和风扇使用量增加,下半年可能出现的厄尔尼诺现象也将加剧用电量,民众对于电费的上涨感受更深。开车人士过去几个星期已经对油价节节攀升感到无奈,随着中东战事胶着,航运占全球油气运输量两成的霍尔木兹海峡被“武器化”,亚洲各国能源供应断链的阴影会越来越深。这次中东冲突对全球能源供应的冲击以及连带的经济影响,很可能会更甚于几年前的冠病疫情。然而,很多本地人至今还未能充分体会到情况的严峻。

亚洲国家总体依赖通过霍尔木兹海峡的原油约九成,天然气约八成,过去几周,多国纷纷拿出储备应急,也设法寻找中东以外的油气供应来源,同时开始采取措施如限电等,试图减缓能源的消耗速度。东南亚国家的挑战尤其艰巨,马来西亚刚刚宣布从4月15日开始,政府部门和相关机构雇员在家上班;菲律宾因为国家储备石油有限,已经宣布紧急状态;泰国国家电视台主播在镜头前脱掉西装,向社会宣示节省电力的重要性;越南削减国家航空公司班次。一些穷国的中下层民众处境更是难上加难,依赖小型交通工具讨生活的商贩、司机和外勤工作者,生存压力与日俱增。但国际能源分析人士认为,类似的应急措施顶多再撑一到三个星期,如果霍尔木兹海峡继续受阻,深刻依赖中东油气的亚洲国家麻烦就大了。

已经延续一个月的伊朗战争,不仅打击波斯湾能源的出口,包括尿素等化肥原料和氦气等关键基础物资的供应也受阻,很多国家的农业原料等价格持续攀升,并开始向下游产业和其他经济层面传导。各国政府与专家最担心的是,能源与原料供应链中断太久,可能演变成能源危机,波及每个国家方方面面的物价和日常生活,导致企业成本飙升,制造与物流等领域难以承受,进而冲击消费与投资情绪,信贷市场收紧、支付与违约增加,可能进一步重挫金融市场,甚至在一些国家触发棘手的滞涨和金融风暴。

整体经济放缓,企业投资和招聘势必收缩,在政府工具箱可用资源不多的弱国,容易引发失业潮和倒闭潮,一连串影响不容小觑。

伊朗试图利用霍尔木兹海峡作为对抗美以的杠杆,宣布可能对每一艘货轮收费200万美元,如果周边阿拉伯国家和美国无力阻止,将进一步抬高原油等成本。也门的胡塞武装若持续另辟红海战场,将再影响国际原油供应的重要路线,对全球的威胁更难逆料。卡塔尔的天然气供应能力已经受到伊朗严重破坏,恢复需时。美以联军一旦坚持不下去,霍尔木兹海峡很可能长期成为伊朗禁脔,这会为中东能源供应带来更大更多的变数。

金融业专家分析,原油价格若在未来6至12个月保持在100美元,亚细安平均通胀会增加2个百分点,经济增长率将下降约1.4个百分点。

各国都在密切留意中东局势及后续发展,黄循财总理昨天特别指出,政府已经采取积极步骤强化我国能源的韧性,包括与天然气主要生产国澳大利亚深化合作关系。政府也会针对立即受影响的家庭和企业提供更多更及时的援助。

但诚如总理所说,国家的韧性不能只靠政府,而是包括每一个人。危机彰显我国储备金充盈的优势,人民应该有信心度过风暴,但更重要的是,每个人应该开始警觉,当下这场冲击对经济层面的打击恐怕不亚于冠病疫情,即便能在短期内停战,中断的供应链恢复和传导效应的消停也需要相当时日。国人应该发挥一己之力,在生活方面节能省电,量入为出,避免挥霍,以稳健的步伐面对更不可知的未来。

Thursday, April 2, 2026

早安 2026-04-02

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Spycam: Is there a spycam in your hotel room?**What you need to know before checking in*

1 of 3 A growing demand for voyeuristic content online has fuelled the proliferation of spycam technology, with cameras getting smaller and easier to conceal. PHOTOS: ADOBE STOCK

=======

DON’T GET SPIED ON

As spycam technology becomes more sophisticated, here is what you need to know before checking into your travel accommodation

=====

2026-03-31

Sarah Stanley

Where they once lurked in public toilets and changing rooms, the Peeping Toms of today have evolved – and so has the techno­logy that ​enables them. 

Armed with pinhole cameras no larger than a thumbnail, and with live-streaming capabilities, offenders now operate at a high level of sophistication. Entire networks can feed voyeuristic content to ​audiences online, often through platforms that exist in dark corners of the internet. 

For travellers, this introduces new risks. These cameras can be ​concealed in accommodation, from hotel rooms to short-term rental homes, and are increasingly difficult to detect.

Hidden cameras are typically ​installed with malicious intent, ​often to capture individuals in ​private moments, and are becoming more deceptive in their design, says Mr Bala Selvam, regional ​security director at health and ​security risk services company ​International SOS.

“It’s getting a bit more tricky to spot these devices because we wouldn’t think they are out of place,” he says, adding that he has come across a hidden camera ​device that looks like an air ​freshener. 

In Singapore, voyeurism was criminalised in 2020. Those found guilty of operating equipment to observe or record private acts can face a combination of imprisonment of up to two years, a fine or caning.

Recent figures suggest the issue remains persistent.

There were 519 voyeurism cases reported in 2024 and 486 in 2025, based on the ​Singapore Police ​Force’s Annual Crime Briefs for those years. A ​significant proportion of these ​cases occurred in ​residential ​premises and shopping centres, and on public transport networks.

Countries around the world have taken similar steps to curb ​voyeurism, yet incidents continue, with more likely to go undetected or unreported.

In some cases, the activity has evolved into organised operations.

In China, for instance, media ​reports point to an illicit spycam recording industry involving ​complex networks, from device suppliers to installation teams to live-stream platform operators.

An investigative report published by the BBC in February found ​thousands of spycam videos filmed in hotel rooms and sold as porno­graphy on multiple websites.

The investigation also uncovered a ​hidden camera in a hotel room in Zhengzhou, capital of Henan ​province.

Despite these high-profile cases, experts caution against overstating the risk to travellers.

The perception of hidden ​cameras is often amplified by ​social media and viral reporting, says Mr Lloyd Figgins, chief exe­cutive of the London-based travel risk management membership community The TRIP Group.

“It is not a routine daily risk for most travellers. However, it is ​credible enough to justify basic precautionary checks,” he says.

Real cause for concern?

What concerns some experts more than the devices themselves is the ecosystem that sustains them.

Mr Bala points to the growing ​demand for voyeuristic content ​online as a key driver behind the proliferation of such devices.

“It is one thing for such acts to be committed by an individual and ​another to commercialise it and sell it for a profit,” he says.

“As long as the latter has demand or growth, you will see such ​devices appear in hotels and other accommodation because those places are where offenders will have high hit rates.” 

This demand has been enabled – and accelerated – by rapid technological advancements. Cameras ​today can be embedded into holes drilled into a wall or disguised within everyday objects, while ​executing high-definition recording, motion detection and even night vision.

Equally significant is how accessible these devices have become.

“HD, Wi-Fi-enabled devices that stream live footage and store data remotely are now inexpensive and widely available online. Some are no larger than a pinhole and can operate silently for extended ​periods,” says Mr Figgins, who was also formerly an overseas security adviser to the British government.

The Straits Times found that ​spycams are widely available on ​major e-commerce platforms such as Alibaba, Amazon and Shopee, with some priced as low as US$1.99 (S$2.60).

The sale of such devices is largely unregulated. Like many consumer tech products, their intended use cannot be determined or controlled by sellers. This ease of ​access – combined with their low cost and discreet design – underscores the importance of travellers taking pro­active steps to protect themselves.

What to look out for

While the idea of hidden cameras can be unsettling, experts say ​precautionary measures do not need to be complicated or time-consuming.

Mr Figgins recommends a ​deliberate three-minute visual sweep upon entering any accommodation.

“Stand where someone would ​logically want to film, like the bed, bathroom or desk, and scan the room from that vantage point. Look for objects directly facing those ​areas that appear unnecessary, ​recently installed, poorly aligned or tampered with,” he says. 

“Briefly darken the room and use your phone torch to look for lens ​reflections. It is not definitive, but it can highlight exposed glass ​surfaces.”

Travellers should pay particular attention to common concealment points such as smoke detectors, alarm clocks, electrical outlets and wall decorations.

Small indicators, such as ​unexplained blinking lights or ​objects positioned at unusual ​angles, may also warrant closer ​inspection.

Mr Bala suggests doing a reverse image search of items travellers may find suspicious.

This uses photos, rather than search terms, to search for information.

To do so, take a photo of the item and click on the camera icon in the search bar on Google. After uploading the photo, Google will show similar images and related products.

“If the items are listed on ​e-commerce websites or commercial platforms, it’s one way to find out that they are being sold as ​cameras and not what they look like – for example, pens or air fresheners,” he says. 

What to do if you find a device

Experts advise against taking ​matters into your own hands if a hidden device is discovered.

Mr Figgins stresses the importance of handling the situation carefully and methodically.

“If a device is discovered, ​document it discreetly with photographs and leave the room imme­diately. Inform the management that you are checking out and ​relocate independently,” he adds.

“Do not accept a room change within the same property and do not rely on the hotel to arrange ​alternative accommodation.”

He adds that travellers should ​report the matter to local ​authorities and, if travelling for work, notify their organisation’s security or travel risk function without delay.

To minimise hassle, some travel­lers may still prefer to request a room change within the same property or an affiliated hotel. If so, Mr Bala says the response from the establishment is telling.

“If the hotel does not treat your report and request seriously, it is a cause for concern. Hotels, or any establishments, have a commercial reputation to protect and they don’t want to be found doing the wrong thing,” he says.

Travel industry safeguards 

For travellers, choosing the right accommodation is the first line of defence. Mr Figgins advises ​prioritising established brands with consistent reviews and strong operational standards.

“In regulated, reputable hotels, particularly international brands with established compliance, audit and CCTV controls, incidents ​remain rare,” he says.

“The higher exposure sits within lightly regulated accommodation markets: short-term rentals, budget guesthouses and independent properties with limited oversight or weak local enforcement.”

Within the industry, many reputable hotels have implemented ​zero-tolerance policies towards surveillance devices in guest rooms. Staff are typically trained to identify suspicious items, conduct routine checks and respond ​appropriately to guest reports.

Operational measures also play a role in reducing risk. These include the use of tamper-resistant fixtures, standardised room layouts that make anomalies easier to ​detect, and restricted access to ​certain fittings such as ceiling ​panels and air-conditioning vents.

At the platform level, additional safeguards have also been introduced to protect travellers’ privacy. 

Home-sharing platform Airbnb, for instance, prohibits all indoor cameras and recording devices in listed properties, even if they are switched off.

Hidden cameras are explicitly banned, while certain monitoring devices such as exterior security cameras, noise decibel monitors and smart devices are permitted only if they comply with platform guidelines and local laws.

While such policies and safeguards reduce risk significantly, they cannot eliminate them entirely – particularly in high-turnover environments where multiple guests and staff access rooms over time.

For this reason, experts consistently recommend a dual approach: industry measures must be complemented by individual vigilance.

Cyber risks on the rise

Beyond physical surveillance, ​travel risks are increasingly shaped by digital threats.

Mr Figgins warns that cybercrime is becoming one of the ​fastest-growing concerns for ​travellers, as criminals exploit ​reliance on technology.

“Fundamentally, travel risks remain consistent. Theft, scams, health incidents, transport accidents and occasional civil unrest continue to represent the majority of incidents affecting travellers. What has evolved is how criminals exploit vulnerability,” he says.

“Travellers depend on mobile ​devices, public Wi-Fi, QR codes, booking platforms and app-based transport. That dependency ​creates opportunity.” 

This digital shift is reflected in broader global trends. The Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 ​report, published by the World Economic Forum, describes cybersecurity threats as accelerating amid geo­political fragmentation and widening technological divides.

Similarly, International SOS identifies cybercrime as one of the key risk factors for business travel in 2026, alongside health risks and climate-related disruptions, in its Risk Outlook report.

Common threats include phishing through fake booking websites or confirmation e-mails, as well as QR code scams that redirect users to fraudulent payment portals.

Experts urge travellers to be alert and prepared to take necessary mitigating measures should they become a target of cybercrimes. 

To mitigate these risks, Mr Figgins recommends a cautious and deliberate approach, including the following advice:

  • Pause and verify rather than ​reacting to urgent prompts or ​unfamiliar links
  • Treat even seemingly legitimate communications with scepticism, as many attacks now mimic legitimate providers
  • Limit real-time sharing of travel locations or itineraries by delaying posts on social media to reduce ​opportunistic targeting
  • Avoid public Wi-Fi networks and unknown QR codes where possible 
  • Be clear on the steps to take if ​something feels off, including who to report it to and which local ​authorities or emergency numbers to call

sarahrs@sph.com.sg