Saturday, July 11, 2026

Are CPF Members Becoming More Financially Savvy? 2026-07-10

Are CPF Members Becoming More Financially Savvy?

Translated by ChatGPT 

For Subscribers Only 

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260710-9345627?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-07-10
Lianhe Zaobao

Author: Suzanne Quek (郭书真)
The author is a Senior Commentator and Deputy Business Editor at Lianhe Zaobao.

=====

AI Summary

The total amount invested by CPF members through their Ordinary Account (OA) has declined for three consecutive years, falling to S$16.6 billion in 2025, reflecting weaker investment appetite.

Treasury bill yields have fallen to 1.4%–1.6%, below the CPF Ordinary Account's guaranteed interest rate of 2.5%, prompting members to keep their funds in their CPF accounts instead.

In 2024, a record 499,000 members topped up their CPF accounts, with total top-ups reaching S$10.4 billion, partly due to the increase in the CPF LIFE Enhanced Retirement Sum (ERS) limit.

About 30% of members participating in the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS) achieved annualized returns below 2.5% or incurred losses, highlighting a trend toward "rational conservatism."

The CPF Board plans to introduce simplified lifecycle investment products in 2028 that will automatically adjust risk allocation based on retirement dates.


This summary was generated with AI assistance and is for reference only.

=====

The following is the original article:

=====

Are CPF Members Becoming More Financially Savvy?

Judging from the latest data on the CPF Investment Scheme, CPF members appear to be becoming increasingly conservative in their investment approach. Viewed from another perspective, however, it could also be said that they are becoming increasingly rational.

According to the latest 2025 data just released by the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board, the total amount invested by CPF members through their Ordinary Accounts (OA) has declined year after year over the past three years, falling from S$25.4 billion in 2023 to S$23.2 billion in 2024, and then dropping significantly further to S$16.6 billion in 2025.

The reduced willingness to use CPF savings for investments may, on the one hand, be related to the interest rate environment. Six-month Treasury bill yields once approached 4% in 2023 and remained above 3% for most of 2024. For many members, using CPF savings to purchase these low-risk products was fairly attractive. However, as Treasury bill yields have fallen back to around 1.4% to 1.6%, leaving funds in CPF accounts has instead become the more attractive option. When the market's risk-free return falls below CPF's guaranteed interest rate, doing nothing is sometimes the more rational investment decision.

On the other hand, more people may be realizing that outperforming the Ordinary Account's guaranteed interest rate of 2.5% is not as easy as they had imagined, let alone the 4% offered by the Special Account (SA) and Retirement Account (RA). For example, between 2016 and 2024, about 490,000 members used their Ordinary Account savings to invest in various CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS) products. Among them, about 30% achieved cumulative annualized returns below 2.5% or suffered losses.

Another set of data also suggests that CPF members are becoming increasingly financially prudent. Last year, 499,000 members made top-ups to their CPF accounts, far exceeding the 335,000 members in the previous year. The total amount of top-ups reached S$10.4 billion, an increase of 116%, setting a new historical record.

This is closely related to policy adjustments. Starting last year, the Enhanced Retirement Sum (ERS) limit under CPF LIFE was raised from three times the Basic Retirement Sum (BRS) to four times. As a result, many members chose to deposit more funds into their Retirement Accounts in order to earn higher interest and receive higher lifelong retirement payouts in the future.

Whether it is investing less or making more CPF top-ups, these changes may not necessarily be a bad thing. After all, CPF is fundamentally meant for retirement savings and should naturally be managed with caution. However, rationality is not every investor's choice. In reality, we continue to witness the opposite phenomenon—many people take excessive risks in pursuit of higher returns and even fall victim to investment scams.

In fact, whether one chooses caution or boldness, the underlying objective is the same: to make one's money work harder. The difference is that some people feel a stable 2.5% return is sufficient, while others consider 2.5% too low and seek returns of 8%, 10%, or even higher.

CPF has always been a system that people both love and hate. Some appreciate it because it allows them to earn stable interest, while others dislike it because, although the money belongs to them, they cannot use it freely as they wish. Such polarized feelings are often related to age and one's liquidity situation. For those who are already 55 years old, keeping money in CPF accounts is like having a savings account that offers a relatively high guaranteed interest rate, allowing them to continue earning interest while maintaining a certain degree of financial flexibility.

Although cash topped up into the Special Account or Retirement Account cannot be freely withdrawn afterward, for those who are not far from retirement age, the difference is actually not that significant. Rather than searching for investment opportunities, a simpler approach for this group is to transfer their Ordinary Account savings into their Special Account or Retirement Account.

Nevertheless, leaving money in CPF accounts may not be suitable for everyone, and it would not be advisable to blindly place all spare cash into CPF. Whether it is worthwhile depends on individual needs. If the spare cash is already intended for retirement, will not be needed for many years, and is not part of one's emergency funds, then depositing it into CPF is certainly an option worth considering.

Given the current interest rate environment, CPF's risk-free returns continue to offer a clear advantage. By comparison, the yields on fixed deposits and Treasury bills generally range between 1.0% and 1.6%, or even lower. Although the recent rise in the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA) has prompted several banks to raise Singapore dollar fixed deposit rates, bank interest rates are unlikely to exceed CPF interest rates in the near term. While inflationary pressures have pushed major central banks toward a more hawkish stance, the damage caused by persistent inflation as well as the impact of U.S. tariff policies on the global economy may limit the pace of further interest rate hikes.

Of course, CPF is not the only option for growing retirement savings. Investors seeking both liquidity and stable returns may also consider relatively low-risk and highly liquid investment instruments, such as short-term bond funds, which are less affected by interest rate fluctuations and are expected to generate annualized returns of about 2.3% to 3.4%. As for investors willing to tolerate a modest degree of market volatility in pursuit of higher long-term returns, conservative robo-advisor portfolios are also worth considering. Such portfolios typically allocate 80% to 90% to high-quality bonds as the core holding, complemented by 10% to 20% in global equities, with the objective of achieving higher long-term returns while keeping risks under control.

Meanwhile, the CPF Board plans to further simplify the CPF Investment Scheme. It is expected to introduce low-cost, simplified lifecycle investment products in the first half of 2028. These products will automatically adjust asset allocation according to members' retirement dates, gradually reducing investment risk as retirement approaches. Whether the new scheme will deliver better returns remains to be seen, but it will at least provide members with another investment option.

Seeking higher returns is, after all, the purpose of investing. Choosing a conservative approach out of concern over losses is equally understandable. The real issue is not whether one is conservative or bold, but whether one can correctly assess risk while pursuing returns. The greatest investment risk is often not market volatility, but the mistaken belief that there truly exists an investment offering guaranteed profits, high returns, and low risk.

The author is a Senior Commentator at Lianhe Zaobao.

公积金会员越来越“精"?

公积金会员越来越“精”?

供订户阅读

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260710-9345627?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-07-10

联合早报

作者:郭书真 (Suzanne Quek)

作者是《联合早报》高级评论员和财经新闻副主任

=====

AI摘要

公积金会员通过普通户头(OA) 投资总额连续三年下降,2025年降至166亿元,反映投资意愿减弱。

国库券收益率回落至

1.4%-1.6%,低于公积金普通户头2.5%保证利率,促使会员倾向保留资金于户头。

2024年填补公积金户头人数达 49.9万,总额104亿元,创历史新高,部分因CPF LIFE超额存款上限提高。

约30%参与CPFIS的会员年化回报率低于2.5%或亏损,凸显“理性保守”趋势。

公积金局拟2028年推简化生命周期投资产品,依退休日期自动调整风险配置。

本摘要由AI辅助生成,仅供参考

=====
以下是原文:
=====

公积金会员越来越“精”?
  从公积金投资计划的最新数据来看,公积金会员在投资方面似乎越来越保守。但换个角度看,或许也可以说他们变得越来越理性。

  根据中央公积金局刚发布的2025年最新数据,公积金会员通过普通户头(OA)投资的总额,过去三年逐年走低,从2023年的254亿元降至2024年的232亿元,2025年进一步大幅缩减至166亿元。

  人们动用公积金来投资的意愿降低,一方面可能跟利率环境有关。六个月期国库券收益率在2023年一度逼近4%,2024年大部分时间维持在3%以上,这对不少会员来说,利用公积金储蓄购买这些低风险产品,有一定的吸引力。 然而,随着国库券收益率回落至约1.4%至1.6%,把资金留在公积金户头,反而成为更具吸引力的选择。当市场上的无风险收益率低于公积金的保证利率时,什么都不做,有时候反而是更理性的投资决定。

  另一方面,也可能越来越多人意识到,要跑赢公积金普通户头的2.5%保证利率,并没有想象中那么容易,更别说特别户头(SA)和退休户头(RA)的4%。例如在2016年至2024年间,约有49万名会员使用普通户头储蓄,投资于各类公积金投资计划(CPFIS)产品,其中约30%会员的累计年化回报率低于2.5%或蒙受亏损。

  从另一组数据,也可看出公积金会员越来越懂得精打细算——去年共有49万9000名会员填补公积金户头,远高于前年的33万5000人,填补总额更达到104亿元,增长116%,创下历史新高。

  这与政策调整不无关系。去年起,公积金终身入息计划(CPF LIFE)的超额存款(ERS)上限,由基本存款(BRS)的三倍提高至四倍,不少会员于是选择把更多资金存入退休户头,以赚取更高利息来换取未来更高的终身退休入息。

  无论是减少投资,还是增加填补公积金户头,这些变化未尝不是一件好事。毕竟,公积金本来就是退休储蓄,原本就应谨慎管理。不过,理性并非所有投资者的共同选择。现实中,我们仍不断看到另一种截然不同的现象——不少人为追求更高回报铤而走险,甚至落入投资骗局。

  其实,不论谨慎或大胆,背后的出发点都一样,希望让自己的钱发挥更大的价值。 不同的是,有人觉得2.5%的稳定回报已经足够;有人觉得2.5%太低,希望追求8%、10%,甚至更高的回报。

  公积金,向来都是一个让人又爱又恨的制度。有人喜欢它,因为能稳稳赚取利息;也有人讨厌它,因为那笔钱明明属于自己,却不能随心所欲地动用。这种两极化的情感,往往与年龄以及个人的流动资金情状况有关。对于已经55岁的人来说,把钱留在公积金户头,像是拥有一个能够享有较高保证利率的储蓄户头,既能继续累积利息,也保留一定的资金灵活度。

  虽然说把现金填补到特别户头或退休户头后,资金便不能随意提取,但如果距离退休年龄不远,其实差别也没有多大。与其寻找投资选择,对这群人来说,更简单的方法,是把普通户头的存款,转到特别户头或退休户头。

  不过,把钱留在公积金户头未必适合每一个人,因此不宜盲目把所有闲钱都存进去。是否划算,取决于个人的需求。如果这笔闲钱原本就打算留作退休用途,未来多年都不会动用,也不是紧急备用金,存到公积金户头也不失为一个值得考虑的选择。

  以当前的利率环境来看,公积金的零风险收益率仍具有明显优势。相比之下,定期存款和国库券的收益率大多介于1.0%至1.6%,甚至更低。虽然近期新元隔夜平均利率(SORA)回升,带动多家银行上调新元定期存款利率,但银行利率短期内预料很难超过公积金利率。尽管通货膨胀压力促使全球主要央行趋向鹰派,但持续物价上涨对经济的损害,以及美国关税政策对全球经济带来的影响,都可能限制央行的加息步伐。

  当然,公积金并非让退休储蓄增长的唯一选择。对于希望兼顾流动性和稳健回报的投资者,还可考虑风险较低、流动性较高的投资工具,例如短期债券基金,它们受利率波动的影响相对较小,预期年化回报率约为2.3%至3.4%。至于愿意承担少许市场波动、追求较高长期回报的投资者,保守型智能投顾组合也是值得考虑的选择。这类组合一般以80%至90%的高质量债券作为核心配置,再搭配10%至20%的全球股票,目标是在控制风险的同时,争取更高的长期回报。

  另一方面,公积金局计划进一步简化投资计划,预料在2028年上半年推出低成本、简化的生命周期投资产品,根据会员的退休日期自动调整资产配置,随着退休临近逐步降低投资风险。新计划能否带来更好的回报,还有待观察,但至少提供多一种投资方式。

  追求更高收益,本来就是投资的目的;担心亏损而选择保守,也无可厚非。真正的问题,不在于保守还是大胆,而是在追求回报的过程中,是否能够正确衡量风险。投资最大的风险,往往不是市场波动,而是误以为市场上真的存在稳赚不赔、高收益又低风险的投资。


  作者是《联合早报》高级评论员

Friday, July 10, 2026

生命

豆包 app:

儒者惜生以立德,道者顺天而安命,佛者破执以静心。

生死本是自然循环,不必贪久,不必忧终,尽心活好当下,便是圆满。

Song 誰 (洋澜一)Shui (YOUTUBE) 2026-07-10

=====

Today is 2026-07-10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=891gn-j20zI&list=RDf-rv-02Xtp4&index=12

1,161,269 views  25 Mar 2024

誰 Shui 

作詞:曾至鋒 作曲:曾至鋒 

原唱:曾至鋒 演唱:洋瀾一


越來越憔悴 是為了誰

莫名的心碎 錯過了誰

撕碎了防備 流過的淚

無力的掙扎 教會了誰

面對你的背叛 無力挽回

告別你的無情 我的無悔

你的溫柔讓我犯罪

多想擁抱你重新再愛一回

你的絕情讓我受罪

多想從來 沒有認識誰


撕碎了防備 流過的淚

無力的掙扎 教會了誰

面對你的背叛無力挽回

告別你的無情 我的無悔

你的溫柔讓我犯罪

多想擁抱你重新再愛一回

你的絕情讓我受罪

多想從來 沒有認識誰

多想從來 沒有認識誰


Who


Growing increasingly haggard, for whom?

A nameless heartbreak, who did I miss?

Tearing down my defenses, the tears that flowed

A futile struggle, who did it teach?

Facing your betrayal, unable to recover

Saying goodbye to your ruthlessness, my regret

Your gentleness made me commit a crime

I long to embrace you and love again

Your ruthlessness makes me suffer

I wish I had never met anyone


Tearing down my defenses, the tears that flowed

A futile struggle, who did it teach?

Facing your betrayal, unable to recover

Saying goodbye to your ruthlessness, my regret

Your gentleness made me commit a crime

I long to embrace you and love again

Your ruthlessness makes me suffer

I wish I had never met anyone

I wish I had never met anyone



聽歌是一種修心

@Lawrenceli-j3z.

1y ago

《聽歌是一種修心》 
開心時,聽的是旋律, 
傷心時,聽的是歌詞, 
動情時,聽的是共鳴,
 心痛時,聽的是自己。

凌夜 Ling Ye (U1 Ultra premium walking male version).

这是优必选UWORLD U1 Ultra顶配行走款男机器人凌夜 Lingye。

This is Ling Ye (U1 Ultra premium walking male version).

The price of Ling Ye is S$188,298.00 (with GST inclusive S$205,244.82).

The female counterpart of Ling Ye 凌夜 is Xiao You 小优。
 
1. 外观匹配:银白短发、这套青绿色高领服装是凌夜发布会专属造型;
2. 型号对应:U1 Ultra男款官方命名凌夜,定价99万元人民币,是可自主行走的顶配版本;女款同系列机器人为小优,五官、发型和这套服装都和图中完全区分开。

=====
这是小优

Photo of U1 Ultra Xiao You (the premium walking female humanoid robot):

Here are official footage and exhibition photos of U1 Ultra Xiao You (the premium walking female humanoid robot):
 
Brief introduction to U1 Ultra Xiao You
 
1. It has 88 high-flexibility joints, capable of stable independent walking, dancing waltz and complex body movements.
2. It adopts hyper-realistic silicone bionic skin with customizable facial features, hairstyles and makeup.
3. Official price: 880,000 RMB, the fully mobile top-tier version of the UWORLD U1 series.
4. The grey mechanical robots in the other search results are generic industrial prototypes, not the finished bionic Xiao You.