Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Building a Multi-Stakeholder Support System – Reducing Loneliness Among the Elderly

Building a Multi-Stakeholder Support System – Reducing Loneliness Among the Elderly

For subscribers only

Translated by ChatGPT

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/lifestyle/health/story20260505-8969468?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

Author: Associate Professor Lee Cheng
Senior Consultant Psychiatrist at Institute of Mental Health
President of the Singapore Association for Mental Health (SAMH)

Lianhe Zaobao
Published 2026-05-05

=====

As Singapore’s population continues to age, some elderly individuals are gradually being excluded from digital social circles due to insufficient digital skills, increasing their risk of social isolation and loneliness. To improve this situation, support can be provided at the individual, family, and societal levels to help them learn digital tools, participate in community activities, and build closer social connections, enabling them to experience a greater sense of belonging in their later years.

Official statistics in Singapore show that as of June 2025, citizens aged 65 and above made up about 20.7% of the population, up from about 19.9% in 2024, reflecting the continuing acceleration of population ageing.

With improvements in healthcare and living conditions, life expectancy continues to rise, and how to enhance quality of life in old age has become an important issue that society must confront.

Ageing is an inevitable part of life for everyone. From physical decline to changes in social roles and psychological states, the elderly stage is often accompanied by multiple challenges. Many older adults gradually lose their work identity and social circles after retirement. Coupled with declining health, reduced mobility, or the loss of relatives and friends, they may experience low mood, increased loneliness, and even cognitive decline. Without timely attention and intervention, this can not only affect quality of life but also increase the risk of illness and mortality.


==========
Associate Professor Lee Cheng believes that older adults should actively participate in community activities. This helps them stay physically and mentally active while also building friendships and strengthening their sense of belonging.
==========

In modern society, rapid technological development is meant to bring convenience, but for some elderly people, it has become a new barrier. Some older adults report difficulty in using smartphones, social media, or video-calling tools proficiently, which unintentionally excludes them from digital social circles. A lack of digital skills makes it harder for them to stay in touch with distant family and friends, as well as to participate in online activities and community interactions. In such situations, some elderly individuals may feel lonely even when surrounded by people, while others, despite having small social circles, may not feel isolated if their relationships are close and meaningful. This shows that “social isolation” and “loneliness” are not entirely the same: the former is an objective condition, while the latter is a subjective experience.

---
Related Reading

Diabetic Foot Can Strike Silently – Don’t Ignore Small Wounds to Prevent Amputation

Stop Letting Your Body Bear Stress Alone – Four Small Habits to Help You Release Burnout
-----


Helping Older Adults Feel Respected, Needed, and Supported

We can take action at the individual, family, and societal levels to create a warmer and more supportive living environment for older adults, enabling them to enjoy a healthy and fulfilling later life. Below are some practical suggestions and directions:

First, encourage elderly individuals to actively participate in community activities. Many community centers regularly organize courses and activities suitable for seniors, such as light exercise, tai chi, dance, cooking classes, handicrafts, and even visits to cultural or religious sites. These activities not only help them stay physically active but also provide opportunities to build friendships and enhance their sense of belonging.

Second, participating in volunteer work is a meaningful option. Older adults possess rich life experience and skills, which can be applied in community centers, libraries, schools, or charitable organizations. Whether assisting with activities, accompanying others, or sharing experiences, these contributions allow them to feel valued while expanding their social networks and reducing loneliness.

Third, promoting the learning of new technologies among seniors is especially important. Through simple and easy-to-understand training, they can master basic smartphone use, video calls, online payments, and social media. This not only improves convenience in daily life but also enables them to stay connected with family more easily. Patience and guidance from children and younger family members are particularly crucial in this regard.

Fourth, for elderly individuals already affected by loneliness, mental health support should be emphasized. Psychological counseling and emotional support can help them better cope with life changes and emotional fluctuations. In addition, companionship programs or buddy initiatives—where volunteers are paired with seniors for regular visits, conversations, or shared activities—can provide emotional support and enhance their sense of anticipation and confidence in life.

Fifth, the role of the family is indispensable. Family members should regularly stay in touch with older relatives through visits, phone calls, or video calls. Even simple greetings can bring great comfort. Celebrating festivals or small life events together, such as birthdays and anniversaries, can strengthen family bonds. Encouraging seniors to reconnect with old friends or build relationships with neighbors also helps create a stable support network.

Sixth, at the societal level, public environments and policy support should be further improved. The design of public spaces should consider the mobility needs of older adults, such as barrier-free facilities, rest areas, and clear signage systems. Providing transport subsidies or shuttle services for those with limited mobility can make it easier for them to participate in social activities or attend medical appointments. Governments, communities, and civil organizations should also strengthen collaboration to promote more senior-centered service programs.

In summary, addressing the transition toward a super-aged society is not only a family responsibility but a shared challenge for the entire society. We must build a more inclusive and caring environment so that every older adult can feel respected, needed, and supported in their later years. By promoting social participation, enhancing digital skills, strengthening psychological care, and improving support systems, we can effectively reduce loneliness and isolation among the elderly.

Let us work together to create a society without lonely old age, where every older adult can continue to live with dignity, warmth, and vitality in the later stages of life.

老年孤独感:多方共建支持体系 - 减少老年孤独感

多方共建支持体系 减少老年孤独感

(供订户阅读)

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/lifestyle/health/story20260505-8969468?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

=====
作者李清副教授
心理卫生学院高级顾问心理医生
新加坡心理健康协会主席
发布/2026年5月5日 05:00
=====

随着新加坡人口老龄化加剧,部分年长者因数码技能不足,逐渐被排除在数码社交圈外,增加社会孤立与孤独感风险。要改善这一情况,可从个人、家庭与社会层面协助他们学习数码工具,参与社区活动,建立更紧密的社交连结,让晚年生活更有归属感。

新加坡官方统计数据显示,截至2025年6月,65岁及以上的新加坡公民占比约为20.7%,较2024年的约19.9%进一步上升,反映人口老龄化趋势持续加快。

随着医疗水平提高与生活条件改善,人均寿命不断延长,而如何提升晚年生活质量,已成为社会必须正视的重要课题。

衰老是每个人生命中不可避免的一部分。从身体机能退化,到社会角色转变,再到心理状态变化,老年阶段往往伴随着多方面的挑战。许多年长者在退休后逐渐脱离原有的工作身份与社交圈,加上健康退化、行动不便或亲友离世等因素,容易出现情绪低落,孤独感上升,甚至认知能力下降。若未及时关注与介入,不仅会影响生活质量,也可能提高疾病风险与死亡率。

=====

李清副教授认为年长者应积极参与社区活动,保持身心活力的同时,也能建立友谊,增强归属感。(档案照片)

在现代社会,科技迅速发展,本应为人们带来更多便利,但对部分老年人而言却成为新的障碍。有些年长者反映,他们难以熟练地使用智能手机、社交媒体或视频通话工具,这使他们在无形中被排除在数码化的社交圈外。缺乏数码技能,意味着他们更难与远方的亲友保持联系,也难以参与线上活动与社区互动。在这种情况下,有些老年人虽然身边有人,却依然感到孤独;而另一些人即便社交圈不大,但若关系紧密,互动有意义,则未必感到孤立。这也说明,“社会孤立”与“孤独感”并不完全等同:前者是客观状态,后者则是主观体验。

让年长者感到被尊重、被需要与被支持

我们可以从个人、家庭及社会层面着手,为年长者创造更温暖、更具支持性的生活环境,让他们能够健康、愉快地度过晚年。以下是一些实用的建议与方向:

首先,鼓励老年人积极参与社区活动。许多社区中心都会定期举办适合年长者的课程与活动,例如轻度运动、太极、舞蹈、烹饪班、手工艺课程,甚至组织前往文化景点或宗教场所的参访活动。这些活动不仅能够帮助年长者保持身体活力,也为他们提供建立友谊的平台,增强归属感。

其次,参与志愿服务是非常有意义的选择。老年人拥有丰富的人生经验与技能,可以在社区中心、图书馆、学校或慈善机构中发挥所长。无论是协助活动、陪伴他人,还是分享经验,这些都能让他们感受到自身的价值,同时拓展社交网络,减少孤独感。

第三,推动老年人学习新科技尤为重要。通过简单易懂的培训课程,掌握基本的智能手机操作、视频通话、线上支付或社交媒体使用,不仅能提升生活便利性,也能让他们更轻松地与家人保持联系。子女与晚辈在这方面的耐心指导尤为关键。

第四,对于已经受到孤独感困扰的年长者,应重视心理健康支持。心理咨询与情绪辅导可以帮助他们更好地应对生活变化与情绪波动。同时,一些陪伴计划或结伴项目,通过志愿者与年长者配对,定期探访、聊天或共同活动,不仅提供情感支持,也增强他们对生活的期待与信心。

第五,家庭的角色不可或缺。家人应定期通过探访、电话或视频联系长辈,哪怕是简单的问候,也能带来极大安慰。一起庆祝节日或生活中的小事,例如生日、纪念日,能够增强家庭凝聚力。此外,鼓励年长者与旧友重联,或与邻居建立关系,也有助于形成稳定的支持网络。

第六,从社会层面来看,应进一步优化公共环境与政策支持。公共空间的设计应考虑老年人的行动需求,例如无障碍设施、休息区域、清晰的指示系统等。同时,为行动不便的年长者提供交通补贴或接送服务,能够帮助他们更方便地参与社会活动或就医。政府、社区与民间组织也应加强合作,推动更多以年长者为中心的服务项目。

总的来说,应对人口迈向超老龄化社会,不仅是家庭责任,更是整个社会的共同课题。我们须要建立一个更加包容与关怀的环境,让每一个年长者都能在晚年感受到被尊重、被需要与被支持。通过促进社交参与,提升数码技术能力,加强心理关怀,以及完善社会支持体系,将可有效地减少老年人的孤独与隔离。

让我们共同努力,创造一个没有孤独晚年的社会,让每一个年长者都能在生命的后半程中,依然活得有尊严、有温度、有光彩。

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

AI: 正视即将到来AI驱动的“富足”冲击 --- The coming AI-driven ‘abundance’ shock ( Business Times 2026-04-14 ) (By 白士泮博士 - Dr. Pei Sai Fan and 石建政博士 - Dr. Willie Shi Jianzheng)

正视即将到来AI驱动的“富足”冲击

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260504-8995859?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-05-04

作者白士泮是南洋理工大学与新加坡国立大学客座教授

石建政是新跃社科大学讲师、新加坡国立大学访问学者

(原载《商业时报》)

=======


当前的挑战在结构上有所不同,新加坡过去的成功,建立在约束条件下优化人力资本之上。人工智能时代则提出另一个考验:如何在“富足”条件下实现良好治理。这是不同的挑战,也就需要不一样的制度设计。

人工智能(AI)时代决定性的挑战,不是如何生产更多,而是在一个可以用越来越少人力生产越来越多东西的世界里,如何维护人的尊严、意义与公平。

美国技术伦理学家特里斯坦·哈里斯(Tristan Harris)在近期一次演讲中,将先进的AI形容为“外星数码移民”,意思是一种大规模进入人类社会的非人类智能。这个比喻令人警醒。但更深层的冲击,不在于AI能做什么,而在于我们尚未正视的问题:我们的整个社会架构,包括法律、劳动力市场、身份认同、政治等,都建立在一个正在悄然失效的基本假设之上。这个假设,就是”稀缺”。

我们正在进入一个不同的世界。

几十年前,美国作家与未来学家阿尔文·托夫勒曾警告“未来冲击”(Future Shock)——即变化的速度超过人类适应能力的状态。但今天的变革不仅仅是速度问题,而是社会如何组织生产、分配回报、锚定意义的基础性转变。

“富足”可能比“稀缺”更具破坏力
在现代历史的大部分时间里,人类社会一直在“稀缺”条件下运行:资源有限,生产力受约束,经济系统负责分配那些无法自由创造出来的东西。工作不仅是生存手段,更成为个人获得身份、尊严和社会认同的主要方式。由此,我们形成现有的经济模式、劳动权利框架,以及对有意义的人生样貌的理解。

AI挑战这一逻辑。它不仅让流程变得更高效,更日益让知识、分析甚至创造力能以接近零的边际成本被复制。在这样的世界里,人类努力与价值之间的传统纽带开始断裂。

悖谬之处在于:”富足”可能比”稀缺”更具破坏力。

有三种冲击尤其值得关注,每一种都比当前公众最常探讨的“岗位替代”叙事更为根本。

第一,经济上的不确定性。虽然AI会提升整体生产力,但收益不太可能被广泛分配。对数据、模型和计算基础设施的掌控,可能导致财富比以前任何一次技术革命都更集中。如果没有审慎的再分配机制,“富足”非但不能缓解不平等,反而可能加剧它。

第二,更深层的社会不安——身份危机。在当代社会,工作不仅是收入来源,也是个人理解自身目标的框架。如果大部分认知劳动(cognitive work)被改变或替代,问题就不再只是人们如何谋生,而是如何定义自己。这不是技能问题,而是身份问题。

第三,认知上的不稳定。当AI系统生成海量内容,信息变得富足,但信任变得稀缺,信息的富足不会自动转化为理解的富足,它同样可能侵蚀民主商议所依赖的共同认知基础。当现实可以被大规模模拟,风险不仅在于错误信息,更在于社会运作所需的共同事实基石的瓦解。信息变得富足,但信任变得稀缺,真正的危险不仅仅是错误信息,而是民主所依赖的共同基石受到侵蚀。

这些问题单靠市场力量无法解决。市场在稀缺条件下,分配资源非常高效,它奖励效率、创新和竞争。但市场并不是为维护人类尊严、保持社会凝聚力,或定义何为美好生活而设计的。在AI时代,最深远的影响不在环境或金融领域,而在人本身:人类能动性(agency)与自主性(autonomy)的侵蚀,以及社会信任的削弱。如果放任不管,纯粹由市场驱动的路径,只会优化出最强大的系统,而非最有益的成果。

工业时代的社会曾认识到资本主义的影响。环境监管、劳动法、反垄断框架、社会保障等,这些不是反市场的,而是市场能够安全运行而不摧毁赖以生存的社会结构的条件。AI时代须要类似的反思,但这一次要应对的是一组不同的外部性(externalities),而且更深刻、更难管理和定价。

这对新加坡这样的社会提出重要问题。新加坡长期以来善于应对“稀缺”——建立韧性、提升技能、将经济增长与社会目标对齐。这种能力是真实的,并让这个国家在历次技术变革浪潮中受益。但当前的挑战在结构上有所不同,新加坡过去的成功,建立在约束条件下优化人力资本之上。AI时代则提出另一个考验:如何在“富足”条件下实现良好治理。

这是不同的挑战,也就需要不一样的制度设计。

如果挑战仅仅是技能错配,技能再培训就足够了。但如果工作的本质正在演变,问题就变成社会设计的问题。教育不能只关注就业能力。在一个信息富足的世界里,判断力——辨别、评估并负责任地行动的能力,可能比单纯的知识更有价值。社会政策不能仅限于缓解经济上的替代效应,还必须考虑如何维护参与感、归属感和代际延续。AI治理也不能局限于安全与合规,还必须追问:技术富足带来的收益如何分享?如何确保进步不以牺牲社会凝聚力为代价?

关于价值观的问题
换句话说,挑战不仅是技术性的,更是制度性的,而归根结底,这是一个关于价值观的问题。

托夫勒的洞见不只是说变化很快,而是说社会的动荡不仅源于稀缺,也源于变化的速度超出人类理解其意义的能力。我们如今正身处这样的时刻,未来不会仅仅由AI决定,它将被公民、制度和政府为此做出的选择所塑造——关于我们彼此之间负有什么义务,关于我们认为人类存在的意义是什么,以及关于我们愿意建设一个怎样的社会。

未来时代真正的稀缺可能不是资源,而是智慧:公平分配收益的智慧、保护人类尊严的智慧,以及确保一个更加富足的世界,不会让人类在人的意义上变得更加贫乏的智慧。

作者白士泮是南洋理工大学与新加坡国立大学客座教授

石建政是新跃社科大学讲师、新加坡国立大学访问学者

(原载《商业时报》)

The coming AI-driven ‘abundance’ shock ( Business Times 2026-04-14 ) (By 白士泮博士 - Dr. Pei Sai Fan and 石建政博士 - Dr. Willie Shi Jianzheng)


The coming AI-driven ‘abundance’ shock

Singapore has long excelled at navigating scarcity, but the emerging challenge is structurally different


Add BT as a preferred source
  • In a world where information is plentiful, judgment – the ability to discern, evaluate and act responsibly – may be more valuable than knowledge alone.
  • In a world where information is plentiful, judgment – the ability to discern, evaluate and act responsibly – may be more valuable than knowledge alone. IMAGE: PIXABAY
Published Tue, Apr 14, 2026 · 07:00 AM

THE defining challenge of the artificial intelligence (AI) age is not how to produce more, but how to preserve dignity, meaning and fairness in a world where more can be produced with ever less human effort.

In a recent talk, American technology ethicist Tristan Harris described advanced AI as “alien digital immigrants” – a form of non-human intelligence entering human society on a massive scale.

The metaphor is striking. But the deeper shock lies not in what AI can do, but in what we have not yet reckoned with.

Our entire social architecture – including our laws, our labour markets, our identities, and our politics – was constructed on a foundational assumption that is now quietly becoming untrue. That assumption is scarcity.

We are now entering a different world.

Decades ago, American writer and futurist Alvin Toffler warned of “future shock” – the condition in which the pace of change outstrips the human capacity to adapt.

DECODING ASIA

Navigate Asia in
a new global order

Get the insights delivered to your inbox.

But today’s transformation is not merely about speed. It is also about a shift in the very foundations of how societies organise production, distribute rewards and anchor meaning.

For most of modern history, human society has operated under conditions of scarcity. Resources were limited, productivity was constrained, and economic systems operated to allocate what could not be freely created.

Work was not just a means of survival; it was also the primary way by which individuals earned identity, dignity and social recognition. This gave us our economic models, our labour-rights frameworks, our sense of what a purposeful life looks like.

AI challenges this logic. It does not simply make processes more efficient; it also increasingly allows knowledge, analysis and even creativity to be replicated at near-zero marginal cost.

In such a world, the traditional link between human effort and value begins to fracture.

Paradoxically, abundance may prove more destabilising than scarcity.

When abundance disrupts

Three forms of disruption deserve particular attention – each more fundamental than the job-displacement narrative that currently dominates public discourse.

First, there is economic uncertainty.

While AI can expand overall productivity, the gains are unlikely to be distributed widely. Ownership of data, models and computational infrastructure may result in wealth being concentrated more narrowly than with any previous technological revolution.

Without deliberate mechanisms of redistribution, abundance risks amplifying inequality rather than alleviating it.

Second, there is a deeper form of social unease – a crisis of identity.

In contemporary societies, work is not only a source of income, but also a framework through which individuals understand their purpose.

If large segments of cognitive labour are transformed or displaced, the question is no longer simply how people will earn, but also how they will define themselves. This is not a skills problem, but an identity problem.

Third, there is cognitive instability.

As AI systems generate vast volumes of content, information becomes abundant – but trust becomes scarce. The abundance of information does not automatically translate to an abundance of understanding.

It can just as easily lead to the erosion of the shared epistemic ground on which democratic deliberation depends. When reality can be simulated at scale, the risk is not only misinformation, but also the unravelling of the common factual baseline that societies need to function.

These are not problems that market forces alone can resolve.

“The future will not be determined by AI alone. It will also be shaped by the choices that citizens, institutions and governments make in response to it – choices about what we owe one another, what we believe human beings are for, and what kind of society we are willing to build.”

Where markets fall short

Markets are highly effective at allocating resources under conditions of scarcity. They reward efficiency, innovation and competition. But they are not designed to safeguard human dignity, preserve social cohesion or define what constitutes a good life.

In the AI age, the most significant impacts are not on the environment or financial markets, but on humans: the erosion of human agency and autonomy, and the weakening of social trust.

Left unchecked, a purely market-driven trajectory will optimise for the most powerful systems – not the most beneficial outcomes.

Industrial-era societies recognised the impact of capitalism.

Environmental regulation, labour law, antitrust frameworks and social insurance were not anti-market. They were the conditions under which markets could function without destroying the social fabric they depended upon.

The AI age requires an analogous reckoning – but one addressing a different set of externalities, deeper and harder to manage and price.

This raises important questions for societies such as Singapore.

Rethinking society, policy and values

Singapore has long excelled at navigating scarcity – building resilience, upgrading skills, and aligning economic growth with social goals. That capacity is real, and it has served this country well through successive waves of technological change.

But the emerging challenge is structurally different. The Republic’s past success rested on optimising human capital under conditions of constraint. The AI age poses a different test: how to govern well under conditions of abundance.

The two are not the same problem, and they do not call for the same institutional design.

If the challenge were simply a skills mismatch, reskilling would be sufficient. But if the nature of work itself is evolving, then the issue becomes one of social design.

Education cannot focus solely on employability. In a world where information is abundant, judgment – the ability to discern, evaluate and act responsibly – may be more valuable than knowledge alone.

Social policy cannot be limited to cushioning economic displacement; it must also consider how to preserve participation, belonging and intergenerational continuity.

And AI governance cannot be confined to safety and compliance. It must also ask how the gains from technological abundance are shared, and how to ensure that progress does not come at the expense of social cohesion.

The challenge, in other words, is not only technological. It is also institutional. And ultimately, it is a question about values.

Toffler’s insight was not simply that change is fast. It was that societies can be destabilised by transformation that outpaces the human capacity to discern the meaning of it. We are, right now, in that kind of moment.

The future will not be determined by AI alone. It will also be shaped by the choices that citizens, institutions and governments make in response to it – choices about what we owe one another, what we believe human beings are for, and what kind of society we are willing to build.

The real scarcity of the coming age may not be resources, but wisdom: the wisdom to distribute gains fairly, to protect human dignity, and to ensure that a more abundant world does not leave us, in human terms, any poorer.

Dr Pei Sai Fan is an adjunct professor at Nanyang Technological University and National University of Singapore (NUS). Dr Willie Shi, a fintech researcher, is a lecturer at Singapore University of Social Sciences and a visiting fellow at NUS.

Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services

Get the full BT experience

Already have a subscription?  Log in

The Business Times
News
Companies
Wealth
Living
More
bt recommends

MDDI (P) 046/10/2024. Published by SPH Media Limited, Co. Regn. No. 202120748H. Copyright © 2026 SPH Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Saturday, May 2, 2026

End-of-Life: My parents are healthy, but getting on in years. How do I talk to them about end-of-life matters?


=====
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/voices/know-talk-parents-death-why-cant-do-it-6088666?cid=internal_sharetool_androidphone_02052026_cna
=====

丁波:一座城邦的清晨是谁打开的

丁波:一座城邦的清晨是谁打开的

=====

*当算法(AI algorithm)走进每一份工作*

算法(AI algorithm)的影响早已不是新闻。送餐员的下一单去哪里、德士司机走哪条路最划算、客服中心多少封邮件由AI自动回复,这些选择的背后,都站着一个看不见的算法。更值得思考的是,AI的扩散并不均匀,它一只手抹去某些岗位,另一只手又把更细密的“绩效考核”放到剩下的劳动者身上:送餐员被准点率打分,清洁工被巡检系统记录,客工的工时和位置被打卡软件全程追踪。工作没有变少,却变得更被算法盯着。
=====

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260501-8984798?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-05-01


一个寻常的傍晚,我下班从新达城走出来,搭地铁回到榜鹅,在一家熟食中心吃晚饭。邻桌坐着一位约莫60岁的安哥,一只手扶着外卖保温箱,另一只手快速扒着面前那份打包饭,手机屏幕不停跳出新订单的提示音——那是平台算法分派的下一趟活儿。他抬头看了一眼时间,把没吃完的那份饭盖上,匆匆走了。我望着那个半空的餐盒,心里忽然意识到:他和其他送餐员,五一劳动节大概还是要工作。

我去年来到新加坡,工作在新达城,住在榜鹅。当初选择落脚榜鹅,是因为这里有一座漂亮的图书馆——透过整面落地窗,能看见水道与绿意,让从对岸新山来的我,第一次有“家”的感觉。这是我第一次以这座城邦为家,迎接5月1日。在我熟悉的许多语境里,劳动节是工人发声的日子,是诉求、横幅与游行的画面;在新加坡,它更像一个温和的提醒——提醒我们,城市能这样运转,是因为有一群人,在我们看不见的角落,把工作做了。

我每天清晨从榜鹅出门,搭地铁穿越大半个新加坡到新达城上班。清晨的组屋楼下,清洁工已经把小道扫得干净;邻里店里,一位安娣正在补货架;榜鹅地铁站月台上,开往市中心方向的车厢,坐满系着工牌的人,他们的工作日,比这座城市的大多数人都要早开始。

到了傍晚下班时候,我从新达城那栋玻璃幕墙的办公楼里走出来,常能看到另一群劳动者正在登场:在中庭擦拭瓷砖的清洁工,在便利店补货的店员,推着餐车穿梭于办公楼层之间的送餐员。一座城市的清晨与黄昏,原来是被两班看不见的人接力撑起来的。

这座城邦的运转,不是从办公楼里开始。它从清扫开始,从地铁开始,从凌晨两三点就抵达鱼市的搬运工开始,从医院夜班护士的最后一次查房开始。这些岗位很少出现在人工智能(AI)时代的光鲜叙事里,却恰恰是AI时代最难替代的那部分劳动——它需要一双手、一双脚、一份在场的耐心。

新加坡在国际场合常被形容为“AI普及率全球第二”“亚洲最聪明的城市”“全球第二大集装箱港”。这些标签很耀眼,但每一个标签背后,都站着具体的人:在港口操作起重机的师傅,在办公楼夜里开吸尘机的清洁工,在地铁站协助乘客的安娣,在德士里把陌生人安全送回家的司机。城邦的奇迹从来不是抽象的,它是被这些具体的人,一日复一日撑起来的。

当算法走进每一份工作

作为一个长期与人工智能打交道的人,我清楚AI正在重塑许多职业。今年第一季度,全球科技业在创纪录的盈利中,裁撤约7万8000至9万人,其中近半数被企业方归因于AI自动化。本地的迹象也在浮现,据人力部的最新调查,本地大学毕业生在资讯科技领域的实际起薪比期望低850元;自然与数理科学领域,落差更高达1300元。从办公楼到流水线,AI都在重新定价每一份工作的含金量。

算法的影响早已不是新闻。送餐员的下一单去哪里、德士司机走哪条路最划算、客服中心多少封邮件由AI自动回复,这些选择的背后,都站着一个看不见的算法。更值得思考的是,AI的扩散并不均匀,它一只手抹去某些岗位,另一只手又把更细密的“绩效考核”放到剩下的劳动者身上:送餐员被准点率打分,清洁工被巡检系统记录,客工的工时和位置被打卡软件全程追踪。工作没有变少,却变得更被算法盯着。

不过,有意思的是,那些最容易被忽视的劳动:清洁、看护、配送、巡检,反而是AI最难真正取代的部分。不是因为它们简单,恰恰相反,是因为它们包含太多算法读不懂的判断:老人今天的脸色比昨天差一点;某段路因为施工要绕开;一份外卖在组屋门口该放在哪个位置才不会被风吹翻。这些细节加在一起,是机器一时半会儿学不会的“现场感”。

换句话说,AI普及得越深,这些“现场劳动”的价值反而越应被看见。问题在于,市场不一定会自动这样定价。当生产力红利被新技术持续放大,资本对那些看不见的工作的耐心,反而可能比从前更短,而被算法管理的劳动者,却往往是议价能力最弱的那群人。

工作的尊严藏在哪里

回到那天傍晚的熟食中心。那位匆匆放下半份打包饭的送餐安哥,让我想起一件事——在新加坡,“工作”不只是糊口的手段,它一直承担着另一重意义:让一个人保有自己的位置感,保有“我在这座城邦里有用”的那份踏实。

一座城市真正的文明刻度,或许不在它的人均国内生产总值(GDP),也不在它的AI普及率,而在它如何对待那些在角落里的劳动者。一份外卖准时送到,一段组屋走廊每天被打扫得干净,一列地铁在凌晨准点到站,这些都不是理所当然的,它们是某个具体的人,在某个具体的清晨或深夜,把它做出来的。算法可以协调他们的路线、节奏与考核,但替代不了他们手上的那份耐心。

五一劳动节真正的意义,我想不在哪一场演讲里,也不在哪一份白皮书里。它在我们日常路过的每一个工作场景之中——我们愿不愿意停下来一秒,认出那位正在工作的人,点一下头,说一声谢谢。

作为一个第一次在这里过五一劳动节的新移民,我没有资格去评说这座城邦的劳工传统。但我想记下这份观察:一座好的城市,不是它有多少摩天大楼,而是无论是谁,只要愿意把一份工作认真做好,都能在这里活得有尊严。就像榜鹅那座我喜爱的图书馆,它之所以让人愿意停下来,不只是因为玻璃落地窗外的水景,更因为每天清晨开门前,总有人把每一张桌子擦得发亮。

5月1日,许多人会休假,许多人却仍在岗位上。送餐的安哥可能还在赶下一单,清洁安娣可能还在擦下一段走廊,地铁司机可能还在跑下一个班次,某个办公楼里的工程师可能还在为一行代码加班。愿这座城邦记得他们;更愿,每一次技术的进步,都让他们的劳动更能被看见,而不是更被埋没。

作者是本地科技公司首席技术官

Friday, May 1, 2026

研究:本地仅约一成中重度牙周炎患者知道自己患病

研究:本地仅约一成中重度牙周炎患者知道自己患病

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/singapore/story20260430-8979131?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-04-30

牙周炎是一类常见口腔疾病,严重的话可能会导致牙齿脱落,但本地中度和重度牙周炎患者中只有约一成意识到自己患病。

新加坡国立大学牙科学院星期四(4月30日)发布了他们领导的一项涉及426人的牙周病(periodontitis)研究调查结果。他们发现,258名中度或重度牙周炎患者当中,只有34人在回答“您觉得自己是否患有牙龈疾病”这道问题时选了“是”,其他人不是选择“否”(136人)就是“不知道”(88人)。


牙周炎属于牙龈疾病的一种,久而久之牙齿会变松和移位,牙龈也会萎缩甚至导致牙齿脱落,影响病患的相貌和生活。

项目负责人是国大牙科学院助理教授兼初级牙科护理与群体口腔健康学科主任吴恩惠博士(42岁)。她在接受《联合早报》采访时说,以国大牙科学院为主的10多名研究人员参与这项研究,经费约为25万元,得到教育部等机构的支持。

调查的问卷阶段在2020年11月至2021年1月之间展开。过后,科研人员对所有参与者进行口腔检查,并结合问卷分析数据。相关论文于今年2月刊发在总部设于英国的国际口腔医学期刊“Journal of Dentistry”上。


参与这次调查的426人,都来自另一个研究糖尿病和牙周炎关系的项目,80%以上是新加坡公民或永久居民。他们通过网上问卷的形式,回答美国牙周病学会使用的八个常见问题,涉及牙龈情况、口腔健康自评、牙齿松动、牙骨损失以及牙线和漱口水使用情况等。


2019年至2020年展开的一项新加坡全国成人口腔健康调查发现,本地中重度慢性牙周炎的患病率为56.9%,且随年龄增长而升高。(周国威摄)

调查发现,受访者中有95人存在牙齿松动问题,但在回答“您的牙齿有没有在无外伤的情况下松动过”这道问题时,只有58人选了“是”。


吴恩惠说,调查结果说明本地公众对于牙龈问题和牙周病不够认识也不够重视,她对此也有直观感受。

“谈起口腔卫生,我的记忆还停留在上小学时,护士老师带领我们班级做刷牙示范。”

她解释,很多人往往等到牙疼以后再去看医生,错失早期治疗的机会。

六年前调查:本地牙周炎患病率达56.9%

根据2019年至2020年展开的一项新加坡全国成人口腔健康调查,本地中重度慢性牙周炎的患病率为56.9%,且随年龄增长而升高,男性所占比例更高。吴恩惠说,这个六年前的调查结果是目前本地已知的最新数据,下一次同类调查还在策划中。


她说,这次国大牙科学院的调查问卷结果,和受访者实际口腔状况的符合率超过七成。目前,牙科学院正和多家诊所探讨,将这份问卷纳入今后一般诊所的日常健康调查工具,提醒患者发现问题后尽早就医。

牙周病患者王忠兴(55岁,自雇人士)告诉《联合早报》记者,尽管他每年去一家私人牙科诊所做两次检查,但那里的医生主要负责口腔清洁和补牙等治疗,不懂得牙龈治疗,所以他需要再另行预约牙龈专家治病。

“我希望以后能在一家诊所完成牙齿和牙龈的定期检查……现在有点像车子坏了,修车店却让我去轮胎店修轮胎,去发动机店修发动机,不太方便。”