Thursday, May 7, 2026

Raising children is a gift of life - not a “net loss”

Raising children is a gift of life - not a “net loss”

(For subscribers only)

Translated by ChatGPT

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260506-9007913?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-05-06
23:00

Lianhe Zaobao

Author: Yu Lan (于岚律师)
(Yu Lan is a lawyer and a partner at the Singapore office of Han Kun Law Offices 汉坤律师事务所
新加坡办公室合伙人)

=====

Recently, I read an article in Lianhe Zaobao that left me deeply moved. The article mentioned that the government will establish an inter-agency task force to reshape Singaporeans’ views on marriage and parenthood. One sentence, in particular, struck me: raising children should not be seen as a “net loss.” This is absolutely true. Over the years, the government has put in significant effort to encourage childbirth—baby bonuses, parental leave, the abolition of the Gifted Education Programme, reducing academic pressure… almost every possible measure has been tried. Yet the reality is that people still seem increasingly “afraid to have children.”

Everyone understands that pressure is everywhere. Although basic living needs are generally met, the rising cost of living, intensifying workplace competition, and especially the seemingly unrelenting elite education system are all very real sources of anxiety. But I often feel that behind all these calculated considerations lies a deeper concern: we have become too accustomed to measuring everything in terms of “input” and “output,” and have forgotten that the most important things in life are never the result of calculations.

Take children, for example. In today’s context, children are often reduced to a synonym for “sacrifice”: broken sleep, diminished freedom, depleted savings, and disrupted career trajectories. It seems as if once you have a child, life becomes shackled.

I have experienced these challenges myself. But if our understanding of children is limited to these aspects, that would be truly regrettable.

I recall the story of Dr. Lim Hong Huay, a nominee for “Singaporean of the Year” in 2024. After 20 years of medical practice as a senior pediatrician, she resigned in 2017 to care for her two children with special needs. To outsiders, this might have appeared as a sacrifice or even the collapse of a career. But to Dr. Lim, it was a reconstruction of life. In 2020, she founded CaringSG, an organization supporting caregivers of individuals with special needs. Drawing on her professional expertise and empathy as a mother, she reached out to caregivers struggling in isolation. Her story tells us that raising children is not merely a one-way depletion—it endows a person with deeper resilience and stronger vitality, enabling them to illuminate the lives of others. Not everyone can found an organization like Dr. Lim, but every parent who sits beside their child under a late-night lamp is undergoing a small yet profound transformation.

I have personally experienced this kind of “mutual growth.” A few years ago, my daughter was preparing for the Gifted Education Programme exams and was under great pressure. Coincidentally, I also had several professional exams to prepare for. One day, seeing her anxious face, I told her: “You’re working hard, and I have exams too. I won’t hover over you, but let’s see who works harder.”

In the days that followed, we each made study plans and posted them on the wall, holding each other accountable. She studied in her room while I reviewed materials in my study. Looking back, what was most valuable was not the final results, but the realization she gained under those late-night lamps—that effort is not a one-sided pressure from adults onto children, but a shared, lifelong learning attitude within a family. Education is never just about words; it is about leading by example.

Children are a mirror for their parents. If you want them to be honest, you cannot be perfunctory in trivial matters; if you want them to be self-disciplined, you cannot act on impulse. Raising children is, in essence, a process of self-cultivation for parents—those anxieties, control tendencies, and impulsiveness revealed through children are precisely what we must confront and correct. Children do not just listen to what you say; they watch what you do.

Children are not an “enhanced version” of their parents

Over the years, I have come to a deeper realization: parents cannot truly “shape” their children’s destinies. Every child is born with their own unique traits. The role of parents is more like providing soil, air, and light for growth, rather than wielding a carving knife to mold them into what we want them to be.

For a long time, I hoped my daughter would study law like me and become a lawyer, as if that would pass on my skills. In my view, it was a broad and promising path that could help her avoid detours. But she happened to love mathematics and showed little interest in law.

At that moment, I realized she is not my extension or an “enhanced version” of me—she is herself. Her life may turn out more remarkable than I can imagine, or take paths we have never walked. What right do I have to shape her using the standards of my generation? What we call “for her own good” may essentially be adult arrogance and a fear of the unknown.

When I let go of this attachment and stopped insisting that she become a lawyer, I instead saw her vitality emerge. She fell in love with Chinese debating and often stayed up late preparing for competitions. Now, if someone asks me, “Is letting her debate paving the way for a legal career?” I would say no. It is purely her choice, not a path I laid out for her. Whether she becomes a lawyer is not important. Debating subtly reshapes her cognitive boundaries, sharpens her logic, and broadens her perspective. These deep-rooted capacities will enable her to handle complex situations with confidence, no matter what field she enters in the future. That is the kind of wealth no one can take away from her.

Looking back, every child has their own foundation. We often believe that by making careful arrangements and heavy investments, we can place our children on a “better” path. But often, this strong desire to control stems from our inner fears—fear that they will go astray, be disadvantaged, or become someone beyond our understanding. Yet fear is contagious: the tighter we hold on, the more suffocated children feel; the more we try to push them onto a “better” path, the harder it becomes for them to move forward.

True parenting is about giving children boundaries within love, and freedom within those boundaries. This freedom is also a form of liberation for parents themselves.

Children are truly a gift. This does not mean they make life easier—on the contrary, they make life heavier. But it is a “weight” of depth. They help us rediscover what love and responsibility mean, and through accompanying them as they grow, we gradually come to understand ourselves, living a life with greater depth and warmth.

The author is a partner at a law firm’s Singapore office.

育儿是生命的礼物,不是“净损失”

育儿是生命的礼物,不是“净损失”

(供订户阅读)

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260506-9007913?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-05-06
23:00

联合早报

作者:于岚
(于岚 Yu Lan 是一名律师和汉坤律师事务所 [Han Kun Law Offices] 新加坡办公室合伙人)

======

最近读到《联合早报》的一篇报道,颁有感触。文章提到政府将成立跨部门工作组,试图重塑国人的婚育观,其中有一句话特别打动我:要强调育儿不代表“净损失”。这话说得非常在理。这些年,为了鼓励生育,政府确实没少操心。婴儿花红、育儿假期、取消高才教育计划、减少课业考试压力……能试的办法几乎都试了。可现实是,大家似乎还是越来越“不敢生”。

谁都明白,压力是无处不在的。虽然基本的生活保障无虞,但生活费日益高涨、职场竞争逐渐白热化,尤其是那似乎永远无法松懈的精英教育体系,每一项都是真实存在的焦虑。但我总觉得,在这些精明的算计背后,藏着一个更深层的隐忧:我们太习惯用“投入”和“产出”衡量一切,却忘了生命中那些最重要的东西,从来不是算出来的。

比如孩子。在当下的语境里,孩子往往被简化成“牺牲”的代名词:意味着父母破碎的睡眠、被透支的自由、缩水的存款,以及被打乱的职业节奏。好像只要生了孩子,人生就从此多了一道枷锁。

这些难处,我也经历过。但如果对孩子的理解只剩下这些,那就真的太遗憾了。

我想起2024年“年度新加坡人”提名人林方辉(Lim Hong Huay)医生的故事。她行医20年,原是一名资深儿科医生,为了照顾两个有特殊需要的孩子,她在2017年毅然辞去医职。这在旁人眼里或许是某种牺牲,甚至是职业生涯的陨落,但在林医生看来,这却是一场生命的重塑。2020年,她创办特需者看护组织关护之心(CaringSG),用医生的专业背景和母亲的感同身受,去拥抱在孤独中挣扎的看护者。林医生的故事告诉我们:养育并不只是单向的消耗,它会赋予一个人更深的韧性与更强的生命力,去照亮更多人的生命。并非每个人都能像林医生那样创办机构,但每一个在深夜台灯下陪伴孩子的父母,其实都在经历一场微小却深刻的自我重塑。

这种“相互成就”,我深有体会。几年前,女儿准备高才教育计划考试,压力很大。巧的是,我当时也正好有几门专业考试要准备。那天我看着她焦虑的小脸,跟她说:“你在努力,妈妈也一样要考试,我不会盯着你学习,咱们比比谁更努力吧。”

接下来的日子,我们各自列好复习计划贴在墙上,彼此监督。她在房间复习,我在书房翻材料。现在回想起来,那段日子最珍贵的并不是最后的成绩,而是她在一盏盏深夜的台灯下看见“努力”不是大人对孩子的单向施压,而是一家人共同的终身学习姿态。教育从来不只是说教,而是言传身教。

孩子是父母的一面镜子。你希望他诚实,自己就不能在琐事上敷衍;你希望他自律,自己就不能随心所欲。养育,本质上就是父母“修身养性”的过程——那些被孩子照出来的焦虑、控制欲和任性,正是我们要去面对和修正的地方。孩子不会只听你说什么,而是看你做了什么。

孩子不是父母的“加强版”
这些年,我还有一个越来越深的感受:父母其实不能真正“塑造”孩子的命运。每个孩子都有自己与生俱来的特质。父母的角色,更像是为他们提供成长的土壤、空气和光,而不是拿着雕刻刀,非要把他们刻成我们要的样子。

很长一段时间,我一直希望女儿能像我一样学法律,将来当律师,仿佛这样一来,我这一身武艺就有了传人。那在我看来是一条康庄大道,似乎能让她少走弯路,可她那时偏偏喜欢数学,对法律嗤之以鼻。

那一刻我才意识到,她不是我的延伸或“加强版”,她是她自己。她的人生可能精彩到超出我的想象,也可能要走过我们从未走过的路。我又凭什么,用我这一代人的标准去塑造她?我们所谓的“为她好”,本质上可能是身为大人的傲慢,以及对未知世界的恐惧。

当我放下执念,不再强求她去当律师,反而看见破土而出的生命力。她爱上华文辩论,为了备赛经常熬到深夜。现在若有人问我:“让她辩论,是不是在为以后当律师铺路?”我会说,不是。这纯粹是她的选择,不是我给她铺的路。当不当律师真的不重要,辩论在潜移默化中重塑她的认知边界,训练她的逻辑,也拓宽她的眼界。这种在思维深处扎下的根,会让她无论将来身处哪个行业,都拥有从容应对复杂局面的底气。这才是她生命里谁也夺不走的财富。

回头看,每个孩子都有自己的底色。我们总以为拼命安排、过度投入,就能把孩子送往所谓“更好”的路上。可很多时候,那种强烈的控制欲,很多时候源于我们内心的恐惧——怕她走偏,怕她吃亏,怕她活成一个我们没有把握的样子。但恐惧是会传染的,我们越抓得紧,孩子越感到窒息;我们越想把她推到“更好”的路上,她反而越走不动。

真正的养育,是在爱里给他边界,在边界里给他自由。这种自由,其实也是父母给自己的解脱。

孩子真的是一份礼物。这不是说他们会让生活变得轻松,恰恰相反,他们会让生活变重——但这种重,是“厚度”的重。他们让我们重新理解什么是爱,什么是责任,也让我们在陪伴他们长大的过程中,一点一点看清自己,去过一种更有厚度,也更有温度的人生。

作者是律师事务所新加坡办公室合伙人

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Building a Multi-Stakeholder Support System – Reducing Loneliness Among the Elderly

Building a Multi-Stakeholder Support System – Reducing Loneliness Among the Elderly

For subscribers only

Translated by ChatGPT

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/lifestyle/health/story20260505-8969468?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

Author: Associate Professor Lee Cheng
Senior Consultant Psychiatrist at Institute of Mental Health
President of the Singapore Association for Mental Health (SAMH)

Lianhe Zaobao
Published 2026-05-05

=====

As Singapore’s population continues to age, some elderly individuals are gradually being excluded from digital social circles due to insufficient digital skills, increasing their risk of social isolation and loneliness. To improve this situation, support can be provided at the individual, family, and societal levels to help them learn digital tools, participate in community activities, and build closer social connections, enabling them to experience a greater sense of belonging in their later years.

Official statistics in Singapore show that as of June 2025, citizens aged 65 and above made up about 20.7% of the population, up from about 19.9% in 2024, reflecting the continuing acceleration of population ageing.

With improvements in healthcare and living conditions, life expectancy continues to rise, and how to enhance quality of life in old age has become an important issue that society must confront.

Ageing is an inevitable part of life for everyone. From physical decline to changes in social roles and psychological states, the elderly stage is often accompanied by multiple challenges. Many older adults gradually lose their work identity and social circles after retirement. Coupled with declining health, reduced mobility, or the loss of relatives and friends, they may experience low mood, increased loneliness, and even cognitive decline. Without timely attention and intervention, this can not only affect quality of life but also increase the risk of illness and mortality.


==========
Associate Professor Lee Cheng believes that older adults should actively participate in community activities. This helps them stay physically and mentally active while also building friendships and strengthening their sense of belonging.
==========

In modern society, rapid technological development is meant to bring convenience, but for some elderly people, it has become a new barrier. Some older adults report difficulty in using smartphones, social media, or video-calling tools proficiently, which unintentionally excludes them from digital social circles. A lack of digital skills makes it harder for them to stay in touch with distant family and friends, as well as to participate in online activities and community interactions. In such situations, some elderly individuals may feel lonely even when surrounded by people, while others, despite having small social circles, may not feel isolated if their relationships are close and meaningful. This shows that “social isolation” and “loneliness” are not entirely the same: the former is an objective condition, while the latter is a subjective experience.

---
Related Reading

Diabetic Foot Can Strike Silently – Don’t Ignore Small Wounds to Prevent Amputation

Stop Letting Your Body Bear Stress Alone – Four Small Habits to Help You Release Burnout
-----


Helping Older Adults Feel Respected, Needed, and Supported

We can take action at the individual, family, and societal levels to create a warmer and more supportive living environment for older adults, enabling them to enjoy a healthy and fulfilling later life. Below are some practical suggestions and directions:

First, encourage elderly individuals to actively participate in community activities. Many community centers regularly organize courses and activities suitable for seniors, such as light exercise, tai chi, dance, cooking classes, handicrafts, and even visits to cultural or religious sites. These activities not only help them stay physically active but also provide opportunities to build friendships and enhance their sense of belonging.

Second, participating in volunteer work is a meaningful option. Older adults possess rich life experience and skills, which can be applied in community centers, libraries, schools, or charitable organizations. Whether assisting with activities, accompanying others, or sharing experiences, these contributions allow them to feel valued while expanding their social networks and reducing loneliness.

Third, promoting the learning of new technologies among seniors is especially important. Through simple and easy-to-understand training, they can master basic smartphone use, video calls, online payments, and social media. This not only improves convenience in daily life but also enables them to stay connected with family more easily. Patience and guidance from children and younger family members are particularly crucial in this regard.

Fourth, for elderly individuals already affected by loneliness, mental health support should be emphasized. Psychological counseling and emotional support can help them better cope with life changes and emotional fluctuations. In addition, companionship programs or buddy initiatives—where volunteers are paired with seniors for regular visits, conversations, or shared activities—can provide emotional support and enhance their sense of anticipation and confidence in life.

Fifth, the role of the family is indispensable. Family members should regularly stay in touch with older relatives through visits, phone calls, or video calls. Even simple greetings can bring great comfort. Celebrating festivals or small life events together, such as birthdays and anniversaries, can strengthen family bonds. Encouraging seniors to reconnect with old friends or build relationships with neighbors also helps create a stable support network.

Sixth, at the societal level, public environments and policy support should be further improved. The design of public spaces should consider the mobility needs of older adults, such as barrier-free facilities, rest areas, and clear signage systems. Providing transport subsidies or shuttle services for those with limited mobility can make it easier for them to participate in social activities or attend medical appointments. Governments, communities, and civil organizations should also strengthen collaboration to promote more senior-centered service programs.

In summary, addressing the transition toward a super-aged society is not only a family responsibility but a shared challenge for the entire society. We must build a more inclusive and caring environment so that every older adult can feel respected, needed, and supported in their later years. By promoting social participation, enhancing digital skills, strengthening psychological care, and improving support systems, we can effectively reduce loneliness and isolation among the elderly.

Let us work together to create a society without lonely old age, where every older adult can continue to live with dignity, warmth, and vitality in the later stages of life.

老年孤独感:多方共建支持体系 - 减少老年孤独感

多方共建支持体系 减少老年孤独感

(供订户阅读)

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/lifestyle/health/story20260505-8969468?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

=====
作者李清副教授
心理卫生学院高级顾问心理医生
新加坡心理健康协会主席
发布/2026年5月5日 05:00
=====

随着新加坡人口老龄化加剧,部分年长者因数码技能不足,逐渐被排除在数码社交圈外,增加社会孤立与孤独感风险。要改善这一情况,可从个人、家庭与社会层面协助他们学习数码工具,参与社区活动,建立更紧密的社交连结,让晚年生活更有归属感。

新加坡官方统计数据显示,截至2025年6月,65岁及以上的新加坡公民占比约为20.7%,较2024年的约19.9%进一步上升,反映人口老龄化趋势持续加快。

随着医疗水平提高与生活条件改善,人均寿命不断延长,而如何提升晚年生活质量,已成为社会必须正视的重要课题。

衰老是每个人生命中不可避免的一部分。从身体机能退化,到社会角色转变,再到心理状态变化,老年阶段往往伴随着多方面的挑战。许多年长者在退休后逐渐脱离原有的工作身份与社交圈,加上健康退化、行动不便或亲友离世等因素,容易出现情绪低落,孤独感上升,甚至认知能力下降。若未及时关注与介入,不仅会影响生活质量,也可能提高疾病风险与死亡率。

=====

李清副教授认为年长者应积极参与社区活动,保持身心活力的同时,也能建立友谊,增强归属感。(档案照片)

在现代社会,科技迅速发展,本应为人们带来更多便利,但对部分老年人而言却成为新的障碍。有些年长者反映,他们难以熟练地使用智能手机、社交媒体或视频通话工具,这使他们在无形中被排除在数码化的社交圈外。缺乏数码技能,意味着他们更难与远方的亲友保持联系,也难以参与线上活动与社区互动。在这种情况下,有些老年人虽然身边有人,却依然感到孤独;而另一些人即便社交圈不大,但若关系紧密,互动有意义,则未必感到孤立。这也说明,“社会孤立”与“孤独感”并不完全等同:前者是客观状态,后者则是主观体验。

让年长者感到被尊重、被需要与被支持

我们可以从个人、家庭及社会层面着手,为年长者创造更温暖、更具支持性的生活环境,让他们能够健康、愉快地度过晚年。以下是一些实用的建议与方向:

首先,鼓励老年人积极参与社区活动。许多社区中心都会定期举办适合年长者的课程与活动,例如轻度运动、太极、舞蹈、烹饪班、手工艺课程,甚至组织前往文化景点或宗教场所的参访活动。这些活动不仅能够帮助年长者保持身体活力,也为他们提供建立友谊的平台,增强归属感。

其次,参与志愿服务是非常有意义的选择。老年人拥有丰富的人生经验与技能,可以在社区中心、图书馆、学校或慈善机构中发挥所长。无论是协助活动、陪伴他人,还是分享经验,这些都能让他们感受到自身的价值,同时拓展社交网络,减少孤独感。

第三,推动老年人学习新科技尤为重要。通过简单易懂的培训课程,掌握基本的智能手机操作、视频通话、线上支付或社交媒体使用,不仅能提升生活便利性,也能让他们更轻松地与家人保持联系。子女与晚辈在这方面的耐心指导尤为关键。

第四,对于已经受到孤独感困扰的年长者,应重视心理健康支持。心理咨询与情绪辅导可以帮助他们更好地应对生活变化与情绪波动。同时,一些陪伴计划或结伴项目,通过志愿者与年长者配对,定期探访、聊天或共同活动,不仅提供情感支持,也增强他们对生活的期待与信心。

第五,家庭的角色不可或缺。家人应定期通过探访、电话或视频联系长辈,哪怕是简单的问候,也能带来极大安慰。一起庆祝节日或生活中的小事,例如生日、纪念日,能够增强家庭凝聚力。此外,鼓励年长者与旧友重联,或与邻居建立关系,也有助于形成稳定的支持网络。

第六,从社会层面来看,应进一步优化公共环境与政策支持。公共空间的设计应考虑老年人的行动需求,例如无障碍设施、休息区域、清晰的指示系统等。同时,为行动不便的年长者提供交通补贴或接送服务,能够帮助他们更方便地参与社会活动或就医。政府、社区与民间组织也应加强合作,推动更多以年长者为中心的服务项目。

总的来说,应对人口迈向超老龄化社会,不仅是家庭责任,更是整个社会的共同课题。我们须要建立一个更加包容与关怀的环境,让每一个年长者都能在晚年感受到被尊重、被需要与被支持。通过促进社交参与,提升数码技术能力,加强心理关怀,以及完善社会支持体系,将可有效地减少老年人的孤独与隔离。

让我们共同努力,创造一个没有孤独晚年的社会,让每一个年长者都能在生命的后半程中,依然活得有尊严、有温度、有光彩。

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

AI: 正视即将到来AI驱动的“富足”冲击 --- The coming AI-driven ‘abundance’ shock ( Business Times 2026-04-14 ) (By 白士泮博士 - Dr. Pei Sai Fan and 石建政博士 - Dr. Willie Shi Jianzheng)

正视即将到来AI驱动的“富足”冲击

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20260504-8995859?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

2026-05-04

作者白士泮是南洋理工大学与新加坡国立大学客座教授

石建政是新跃社科大学讲师、新加坡国立大学访问学者

(原载《商业时报》)

=======


当前的挑战在结构上有所不同,新加坡过去的成功,建立在约束条件下优化人力资本之上。人工智能时代则提出另一个考验:如何在“富足”条件下实现良好治理。这是不同的挑战,也就需要不一样的制度设计。

人工智能(AI)时代决定性的挑战,不是如何生产更多,而是在一个可以用越来越少人力生产越来越多东西的世界里,如何维护人的尊严、意义与公平。

美国技术伦理学家特里斯坦·哈里斯(Tristan Harris)在近期一次演讲中,将先进的AI形容为“外星数码移民”,意思是一种大规模进入人类社会的非人类智能。这个比喻令人警醒。但更深层的冲击,不在于AI能做什么,而在于我们尚未正视的问题:我们的整个社会架构,包括法律、劳动力市场、身份认同、政治等,都建立在一个正在悄然失效的基本假设之上。这个假设,就是”稀缺”。

我们正在进入一个不同的世界。

几十年前,美国作家与未来学家阿尔文·托夫勒曾警告“未来冲击”(Future Shock)——即变化的速度超过人类适应能力的状态。但今天的变革不仅仅是速度问题,而是社会如何组织生产、分配回报、锚定意义的基础性转变。

“富足”可能比“稀缺”更具破坏力
在现代历史的大部分时间里,人类社会一直在“稀缺”条件下运行:资源有限,生产力受约束,经济系统负责分配那些无法自由创造出来的东西。工作不仅是生存手段,更成为个人获得身份、尊严和社会认同的主要方式。由此,我们形成现有的经济模式、劳动权利框架,以及对有意义的人生样貌的理解。

AI挑战这一逻辑。它不仅让流程变得更高效,更日益让知识、分析甚至创造力能以接近零的边际成本被复制。在这样的世界里,人类努力与价值之间的传统纽带开始断裂。

悖谬之处在于:”富足”可能比”稀缺”更具破坏力。

有三种冲击尤其值得关注,每一种都比当前公众最常探讨的“岗位替代”叙事更为根本。

第一,经济上的不确定性。虽然AI会提升整体生产力,但收益不太可能被广泛分配。对数据、模型和计算基础设施的掌控,可能导致财富比以前任何一次技术革命都更集中。如果没有审慎的再分配机制,“富足”非但不能缓解不平等,反而可能加剧它。

第二,更深层的社会不安——身份危机。在当代社会,工作不仅是收入来源,也是个人理解自身目标的框架。如果大部分认知劳动(cognitive work)被改变或替代,问题就不再只是人们如何谋生,而是如何定义自己。这不是技能问题,而是身份问题。

第三,认知上的不稳定。当AI系统生成海量内容,信息变得富足,但信任变得稀缺,信息的富足不会自动转化为理解的富足,它同样可能侵蚀民主商议所依赖的共同认知基础。当现实可以被大规模模拟,风险不仅在于错误信息,更在于社会运作所需的共同事实基石的瓦解。信息变得富足,但信任变得稀缺,真正的危险不仅仅是错误信息,而是民主所依赖的共同基石受到侵蚀。

这些问题单靠市场力量无法解决。市场在稀缺条件下,分配资源非常高效,它奖励效率、创新和竞争。但市场并不是为维护人类尊严、保持社会凝聚力,或定义何为美好生活而设计的。在AI时代,最深远的影响不在环境或金融领域,而在人本身:人类能动性(agency)与自主性(autonomy)的侵蚀,以及社会信任的削弱。如果放任不管,纯粹由市场驱动的路径,只会优化出最强大的系统,而非最有益的成果。

工业时代的社会曾认识到资本主义的影响。环境监管、劳动法、反垄断框架、社会保障等,这些不是反市场的,而是市场能够安全运行而不摧毁赖以生存的社会结构的条件。AI时代须要类似的反思,但这一次要应对的是一组不同的外部性(externalities),而且更深刻、更难管理和定价。

这对新加坡这样的社会提出重要问题。新加坡长期以来善于应对“稀缺”——建立韧性、提升技能、将经济增长与社会目标对齐。这种能力是真实的,并让这个国家在历次技术变革浪潮中受益。但当前的挑战在结构上有所不同,新加坡过去的成功,建立在约束条件下优化人力资本之上。AI时代则提出另一个考验:如何在“富足”条件下实现良好治理。

这是不同的挑战,也就需要不一样的制度设计。

如果挑战仅仅是技能错配,技能再培训就足够了。但如果工作的本质正在演变,问题就变成社会设计的问题。教育不能只关注就业能力。在一个信息富足的世界里,判断力——辨别、评估并负责任地行动的能力,可能比单纯的知识更有价值。社会政策不能仅限于缓解经济上的替代效应,还必须考虑如何维护参与感、归属感和代际延续。AI治理也不能局限于安全与合规,还必须追问:技术富足带来的收益如何分享?如何确保进步不以牺牲社会凝聚力为代价?

关于价值观的问题
换句话说,挑战不仅是技术性的,更是制度性的,而归根结底,这是一个关于价值观的问题。

托夫勒的洞见不只是说变化很快,而是说社会的动荡不仅源于稀缺,也源于变化的速度超出人类理解其意义的能力。我们如今正身处这样的时刻,未来不会仅仅由AI决定,它将被公民、制度和政府为此做出的选择所塑造——关于我们彼此之间负有什么义务,关于我们认为人类存在的意义是什么,以及关于我们愿意建设一个怎样的社会。

未来时代真正的稀缺可能不是资源,而是智慧:公平分配收益的智慧、保护人类尊严的智慧,以及确保一个更加富足的世界,不会让人类在人的意义上变得更加贫乏的智慧。

作者白士泮是南洋理工大学与新加坡国立大学客座教授

石建政是新跃社科大学讲师、新加坡国立大学访问学者

(原载《商业时报》)

The coming AI-driven ‘abundance’ shock ( Business Times 2026-04-14 ) (By 白士泮博士 - Dr. Pei Sai Fan and 石建政博士 - Dr. Willie Shi Jianzheng)


The coming AI-driven ‘abundance’ shock

Singapore has long excelled at navigating scarcity, but the emerging challenge is structurally different


Add BT as a preferred source
  • In a world where information is plentiful, judgment – the ability to discern, evaluate and act responsibly – may be more valuable than knowledge alone.
  • In a world where information is plentiful, judgment – the ability to discern, evaluate and act responsibly – may be more valuable than knowledge alone. IMAGE: PIXABAY
Published Tue, Apr 14, 2026 · 07:00 AM

THE defining challenge of the artificial intelligence (AI) age is not how to produce more, but how to preserve dignity, meaning and fairness in a world where more can be produced with ever less human effort.

In a recent talk, American technology ethicist Tristan Harris described advanced AI as “alien digital immigrants” – a form of non-human intelligence entering human society on a massive scale.

The metaphor is striking. But the deeper shock lies not in what AI can do, but in what we have not yet reckoned with.

Our entire social architecture – including our laws, our labour markets, our identities, and our politics – was constructed on a foundational assumption that is now quietly becoming untrue. That assumption is scarcity.

We are now entering a different world.

Decades ago, American writer and futurist Alvin Toffler warned of “future shock” – the condition in which the pace of change outstrips the human capacity to adapt.

DECODING ASIA

Navigate Asia in
a new global order

Get the insights delivered to your inbox.

But today’s transformation is not merely about speed. It is also about a shift in the very foundations of how societies organise production, distribute rewards and anchor meaning.

For most of modern history, human society has operated under conditions of scarcity. Resources were limited, productivity was constrained, and economic systems operated to allocate what could not be freely created.

Work was not just a means of survival; it was also the primary way by which individuals earned identity, dignity and social recognition. This gave us our economic models, our labour-rights frameworks, our sense of what a purposeful life looks like.

AI challenges this logic. It does not simply make processes more efficient; it also increasingly allows knowledge, analysis and even creativity to be replicated at near-zero marginal cost.

In such a world, the traditional link between human effort and value begins to fracture.

Paradoxically, abundance may prove more destabilising than scarcity.

When abundance disrupts

Three forms of disruption deserve particular attention – each more fundamental than the job-displacement narrative that currently dominates public discourse.

First, there is economic uncertainty.

While AI can expand overall productivity, the gains are unlikely to be distributed widely. Ownership of data, models and computational infrastructure may result in wealth being concentrated more narrowly than with any previous technological revolution.

Without deliberate mechanisms of redistribution, abundance risks amplifying inequality rather than alleviating it.

Second, there is a deeper form of social unease – a crisis of identity.

In contemporary societies, work is not only a source of income, but also a framework through which individuals understand their purpose.

If large segments of cognitive labour are transformed or displaced, the question is no longer simply how people will earn, but also how they will define themselves. This is not a skills problem, but an identity problem.

Third, there is cognitive instability.

As AI systems generate vast volumes of content, information becomes abundant – but trust becomes scarce. The abundance of information does not automatically translate to an abundance of understanding.

It can just as easily lead to the erosion of the shared epistemic ground on which democratic deliberation depends. When reality can be simulated at scale, the risk is not only misinformation, but also the unravelling of the common factual baseline that societies need to function.

These are not problems that market forces alone can resolve.

“The future will not be determined by AI alone. It will also be shaped by the choices that citizens, institutions and governments make in response to it – choices about what we owe one another, what we believe human beings are for, and what kind of society we are willing to build.”

Where markets fall short

Markets are highly effective at allocating resources under conditions of scarcity. They reward efficiency, innovation and competition. But they are not designed to safeguard human dignity, preserve social cohesion or define what constitutes a good life.

In the AI age, the most significant impacts are not on the environment or financial markets, but on humans: the erosion of human agency and autonomy, and the weakening of social trust.

Left unchecked, a purely market-driven trajectory will optimise for the most powerful systems – not the most beneficial outcomes.

Industrial-era societies recognised the impact of capitalism.

Environmental regulation, labour law, antitrust frameworks and social insurance were not anti-market. They were the conditions under which markets could function without destroying the social fabric they depended upon.

The AI age requires an analogous reckoning – but one addressing a different set of externalities, deeper and harder to manage and price.

This raises important questions for societies such as Singapore.

Rethinking society, policy and values

Singapore has long excelled at navigating scarcity – building resilience, upgrading skills, and aligning economic growth with social goals. That capacity is real, and it has served this country well through successive waves of technological change.

But the emerging challenge is structurally different. The Republic’s past success rested on optimising human capital under conditions of constraint. The AI age poses a different test: how to govern well under conditions of abundance.

The two are not the same problem, and they do not call for the same institutional design.

If the challenge were simply a skills mismatch, reskilling would be sufficient. But if the nature of work itself is evolving, then the issue becomes one of social design.

Education cannot focus solely on employability. In a world where information is abundant, judgment – the ability to discern, evaluate and act responsibly – may be more valuable than knowledge alone.

Social policy cannot be limited to cushioning economic displacement; it must also consider how to preserve participation, belonging and intergenerational continuity.

And AI governance cannot be confined to safety and compliance. It must also ask how the gains from technological abundance are shared, and how to ensure that progress does not come at the expense of social cohesion.

The challenge, in other words, is not only technological. It is also institutional. And ultimately, it is a question about values.

Toffler’s insight was not simply that change is fast. It was that societies can be destabilised by transformation that outpaces the human capacity to discern the meaning of it. We are, right now, in that kind of moment.

The future will not be determined by AI alone. It will also be shaped by the choices that citizens, institutions and governments make in response to it – choices about what we owe one another, what we believe human beings are for, and what kind of society we are willing to build.

The real scarcity of the coming age may not be resources, but wisdom: the wisdom to distribute gains fairly, to protect human dignity, and to ensure that a more abundant world does not leave us, in human terms, any poorer.

Dr Pei Sai Fan is an adjunct professor at Nanyang Technological University and National University of Singapore (NUS). Dr Willie Shi, a fintech researcher, is a lecturer at Singapore University of Social Sciences and a visiting fellow at NUS.

Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services

Get the full BT experience

Already have a subscription?  Log in

The Business Times
News
Companies
Wealth
Living
More
bt recommends

MDDI (P) 046/10/2024. Published by SPH Media Limited, Co. Regn. No. 202120748H. Copyright © 2026 SPH Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Saturday, May 2, 2026

End-of-Life: My parents are healthy, but getting on in years. How do I talk to them about end-of-life matters?


=====
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/voices/know-talk-parents-death-why-cant-do-it-6088666?cid=internal_sharetool_androidphone_02052026_cna
=====