Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Candidates Now Face a New Challenge: What AI Thinks of Them

The information source of the enclosed AI-formatted article with added headings for easy reading is:
=====

US politicians are trying to change what chatbots say about them

By Stuart A. Thompson, Tiffany Hsu

For subscribers only 

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/us-politicians-are-trying-to-change-what-chatbots-say-about-them

2026-07-20
The Straits Times 


=====
The AI-formatted article 
=====

Candidates Now Face a New Challenge: What AI Thinks of Them

WASHINGTON – Dustin Lloyd, a US Democratic primary candidate for Missouri’s state legislature, was a well-known member of his community when he started his political campaign. But there was one important group that did not seem to know him at all: Artificial intelligence chatbots.

If voters quizzed a chatbot like OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini about Lloyd, they would find only basic information that failed to convey his focus on helping small businesses. Fortunately for Lloyd, there was a fix. He tweaked his online presence, publishing a Q&A about himself on his campaign website. Later, when the chatbots were quizzed again, they dutifully connected that personal history to his policy goals.

Editing AI’s output proved to be easier than he imagined. Since then, Lloyd said, “I’m constantly working on it every day.”

Candidates have long had to worry about their reputations among voters. Now, they have to worry about what AI thinks about them too. And a new industry has sprung up to help them navigate this world.

The Rise of Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
=====
Lloyd, 33, relied on a report on his AI presence from CampSight, a tool launched in June by Run for Something Action Fund, a progressive group that recruits young candidates to run for office.

It determined that Lloyd’s website and his presence on Wikipedia and Ballotpedia – sites on which voters regularly find information about political figures – were lackluster, advising him to make changes. It even recommended posting threads on Reddit so the chatbots would begin including information from the online forum in their responses.

“Everyone’s just grasping for some sort of tool to at least inspect these results and ideally influence them,” said Jordan Haines, chief technology officer for Run for Something.

The industry, known as answer engine optimization, or AEO, is a response to changes in how AI chatbots generate their answers.

How Modern Chatbots Work
=====
The earliest chatbots, released several years ago, were trained on huge amounts of information that had already been published online. That made many of their answers about news events almost instantly outdated.

Modern chatbots solved that problem by searching the internet and pulling in fresh content to answer questions about current events, including the midterms and candidates.

Recommendations from AEO tools like CampSight are typically limited to rewriting content on a candidate’s own website or ensuring Wikipedia is up to date. But well-financed candidates may ultimately try to publish a wider array of content online that would be aimed squarely at getting noticed – and parroted – by chatbots, experts said.

The Unpredictable Nature of LLMs
=====
“There is a certain degree of panic around it, because we understand it so little and it’s changing so fast,” said Beth Simone Noveck, a professor at Northeastern University who is studying democracy and AI tools, known as large language models or LLMs.

“Even if there are people who claim to understand it, even if they master some of the techniques, the changing and unpredictable nature of LLMs just means it’s really difficult to control this process,” she added.

The Risk of Inaccurate AI Search Results
=====
Politicians are also weighing another risk: Getting smeared by AI search results that are not just unflattering, but also flat-out wrong.

An experiment before Scotland’s parliamentary election in May found that more than a third of AI-generated answers to questions about the upcoming vote were inaccurate.

Researchers for Demos, a British think-tank, found that multiple chatbots were inventing candidates, fabricating nepotism accusations or concocting financial scandals. Some falsely claimed that an incumbent was running when they were not, while others misstated candidates’ positions.

Voters Turning to Chatbots for Political Information
=====
Still, voters are increasingly turning to chatbots for answers to their political questions. Caucus AI, a political AEO research company, estimated that at least 16 million voters were getting election information from AI, either through chatbots or from AI-generated answers on search results pages.

“As people get more used to this, and as the reliability of the information coming from these chatbots increases, we do think that there will be a significant uptick in 2028 and beyond,” said Meg Schwenzfeier, a founder at Caucus AI and former chief analytics officer of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign.

Caucus AI ran an experiment to see how long it took for content newly published to Wikipedia to end up in a chatbot’s answer. The result: About 12 minutes. That suggests that candidates can already insert their own information into an AI’s responses by tweaking public information “quickly, unvetted and without anyone on the other side watching,” the company wrote in a blog post about its findings.

Caucus AI is tracking what chatbots are saying about all Senate, House and gubernatorial candidates, finding that some candidate messaging has an unusual ability to break through.

For example, when the group asked three different chatbots about Mary Peltola, the Democratic challenger for US Senate in Alaska, they all cited her unique slogan: “Fish. Family. Freedom.”

“We’re exploring what causes that to get picked up,” Schwenzfeier said. “There’s still a lot we don’t understand, and these models themselves are black boxes.”

The Threat of Disinformation Actors
=====
If candidates and political groups can nudge chatbots to produce more palatable answers, experts in digital strategy worry that foreign influence operatives and others might also try to manipulate AI searches.

“Disinformation actors are, by definition, early adopters – they will use every technique and every technology they can,” said Tim Chambers, who runs the digital and social media arm of Dewey Square Group, a public-affairs firm in Washington whose clients include labor unions and government agencies.

The firm has been helping clients audit their websites to see how accessible they are to chatbot scrapers; in research published in February, Dewey found that far-right sites and sites with “very low” factual integrity had set up their websites to be easily seen by AI tools, compared with outlets that were center-left or highly factual.

Chambers said that his clients were thinking about “needing to rebuild their websites for machines as much as for humans,” and considering how to show up in chatbot queries posed in multiple languages.

Instant Impact of AI Optimization
=====
For Lloyd, the Democratic primary candidate in Missouri, the changes he made had an instant impact. When the chatbot was first asked who voters should support in the primary, it recommended his opponent, Tanya Lakins, citing her focus on small businesses. After Lloyd made tweaks to his website, the chatbot changed its tune.

“If you’re voting in the Democratic primary,” it wrote, “Dustin Charles Lloyd appears to have the strongest and most explicit small-business platform.”

NYTIMES•This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

More on this topic
=====
Trump accuses China of 2020 election interference, contradicting US intel
Rise of AI slop and ‘pink slime’ journalism poses risk to Australian politics: Experts

Heading vs. Headline

Use "A heading for a few paragraphs below" or "A headline for a few paragraphs below." [1]
Here is how to choose the right words and preposition for your sentence:

Use "For" Instead of "Of"

  • "For" indicates the purpose of the heading.
  • "Of" implies the paragraphs own the heading, which sounds unnatural.

Heading vs. Headline

  • Heading: Best for standard text, essays, reports, or articles. It labels a section.
  • Headline: Best for journalism, news, or attention-grabbing titles. It summarizes a story. [2, 3, 4, 5]

Quick Examples

  • "Here is a heading for the next few paragraphs." (Reports/Essays)
  • "I need a catchy headline for these opening paragraphs." (News/Marketing)
To help me give you the perfect option, could you tell me what kind of document you are writing (e.g., an academic essay, a blog post, or a business report) and what tone you want to set?

守护认知力年龄提前 护脑黄金期从40岁开始

联合早报

2026-07-21

报道|孙慧纹

守护认知力年龄提前 护脑黄金期从40岁开始

大脑衰老并非始于白发苍苍,而是在日复一日的生活习惯中悄然累积。专家指出,护脑黄金期应提前至中青年,尤其40岁后更应未雨绸缪,及早控制“三高”、关注视力听力变化,并培养规律运动、充足睡眠与均衡饮食等健康习惯。从中年开始为大脑“储蓄”,有助降低认知退化与失智风险,守护长久的记忆力与思考力。

维护大脑健康,应摒弃“等老了再保养”的错误观念。2024年《柳叶刀》委员会(Lancet Commission)的更新报告指出,全球约45%的失智症病例,与可改变的风险因素有关。

  响应7月22日世界脑健康日“全民脑健康”(Brain Health for All)呼吁,护脑黄金期应提前至中青年。从控制常见慢性病、筛查视力听力,到保持充足睡眠与规律运动,每一个日常细节,都是预防脑退化的重要基础。 

  国立脑神经医学院神经内科临床助理教授与高级顾问医生林栩铃指出,脑健康不只是没有失智症或其他脑部疾病,也包括良好的思考、记忆、情绪调节及日常生活能力。即使未患有明确的神经系统疾病,长期压力、睡眠不足或血管风险因素控制不佳,也可能影响大脑发挥最佳功能。 

预防脑退化先控制“三高”

  林栩铃医生指出,认知退化是数十年缓慢累积的结果。40至50岁是维护脑健康的关键期,高血压、糖尿病及高胆固醇(俗称“三高”)等可改变的风险因素易在此阶段出现或恶化。研究显示,中年出现高血压者,未来罹患失智症的风险比老年才发病者更高。

  她解释,“三高”不仅是代谢问题,更会直接损害脑部。长期高血压会损伤脑部微血管,增加血管性失智及认知障碍风险;糖尿病会引起慢性发炎及血管损伤,并增加阿尔茨海默症和血管性失智症风险;中年时期低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇偏高则与脑内异常蛋白沉积相关。这些慢性病也会增加中风风险,导致认知能力骤降。

  林医生建议,预防脑退化应先控制“三高”,并从均衡饮食做起。她建议采用地中海或心智饮食,多吃蔬果、全谷物、鱼类和橄榄油,限制红肉与高糖食品,通过抗炎、改善血管,为脑神经提供关键营养,同时延缓退化。她也提醒,切勿迷信银杏或Omega-3等补脑品,其依据不足,无法替代健康生活与正规医疗。 

运动睡眠促进脑健康

  运动与睡眠同样重要。林医生说,每周至少150分钟中等强度运动能促进脑健康,深层睡眠则帮助大脑清除代谢废物。同时要保持社交与持续学习,多阅读、学习新技能以建立认知储备,增强大脑应对老化的能力。她呼吁,若记忆或思考力持续退步并影响日常生活,应尽早求医检查。

  许多人以为没有不适,就代表脑部健康无虞。新保集团综合诊疗所东南区域主任临床服务医生陈俊生指出:“脑健康其实是一场终身旅程,中青年时期的生活选择,将深远影响日后的大脑功能。”

  陈俊生医生提醒,高血压、糖尿病和高胆固醇是本地常见慢性疾病,也与认知退化风险增加有关。不过,这些疾病却往往没有明显症状,因此高血压和高胆固醇更被称为“沉默杀手”。即使没有不适,若长期控制不佳,仍会持续损害脑部与血管,增加中风、心脏病及血管性失智症风险。 

  若发现自己或家人经常忘记近期事务、反复提问、表达困难、无法完成熟悉工作或性格情绪大变,应尽早求医,切勿拖延。

40岁后须关注四大指标

  陈俊生医生强调,40至60岁是控制慢性病、预防脑退化的重要时期,应趁身体仍未出现明显症状时主动管理健康。 

  他建议,成年人应留意血压、血糖、胆固醇及身体质量指数(Body Mass Index,简称BMI)四项指标。透过定期健康筛查,可在症状出现前发现风险因素,及早透过健康饮食、规律运动、减少饮酒及必要时接受药物治疗,降低血管长期受损的风险。

  陈俊生医生指出,除控制慢性病外,也应维持充足睡眠、均衡饮食、规律运动,并戒烟、避免过量饮酒。睡眠有助脑部清除代谢废物,巩固记忆;规律运动可促进脑部血流,降低多种慢性病风险;全谷类、鱼类及蔬果等健康饮食,则有助保护脑细胞。

  他也鼓励积极社交、持续动脑,及早处理听力问题,以促进神经连接、减少社交孤立,增强大脑韧性,降低未来认知退化风险。 

眼睛是观察脑健康的窗口 

  此外,听力与视力退化会减少感官输入,迫使大脑耗费更多资源处理信息,长远可能削弱记忆与思考能力,切勿视为正常老化。

  眼睛不仅让我们看见世界,也是观察脑健康的重要窗口。伊丽莎白诺维娜医院神经眼科高级顾问医生吴光洋副教授指出:“眼睛可说是大脑的延伸。两者源自相同胚胎组织,细胞结构及神经化学特性相近,视力变化因此会直接影响脑部活动。”

  视觉是人体最重要的感官之一。他说,视力受损会减少脑部接收到的视觉刺激,严重时甚至会令部分大脑功能陷入“半休眠”状态,继而导致精神不振、焦虑或抑郁等问题。

  吴光洋副教授指出,白内障、青光眼、糖尿病视网膜病变及老年黄斑变性等常见眼疾,会令影像变得模糊、扭曲或残缺,影响大脑接收和处理信息。他说:“当大脑接收到不完整的信息时,可能影响日常判断,如老年黄斑变性患者因深度感受能力下降,更易跌倒,继而影响行动能力、独立生活及心理健康。”

  未经治疗的视力障碍,也会影响记忆力、社交参与、行动能力及认知功能。人们可能因看不清而减少外出与社交,从而加速认知退化。他提到,2022年《英国医学杂志》(British Medical Journal)一项涵盖110项研究的分析证实,年长者视力受损会增加认知退化与失智风险。

  吴光洋副教授说,“三高”会损害全身血管,减少脑部及眼部血供。眼睛是人体少数可直接观察血管、神经及组织的器官,因此眼科检查有助反映全身血管健康。他提醒,青光眼等眼疾在初期没有明显症状,一旦视力受损便无法逆转,因此建议成年人自40至45岁起,每年接受例行眼科筛查,包括视力、眼压及眼底照相。若有青光眼家族史或糖尿病等高风险因素,更应提早筛查。

  他说,平时除了保持均衡饮食、充足睡眠及规律运动,也应避免长时间连续使用电子产品,并遵循“20-20-20”护眼原则:每用眼20分钟,远望20英尺外至少20秒,让眼睛适当休息。 

听力退化影响大脑健康

  不少人会定期验眼,却很少主动检查听力。伊丽莎白医院耳鼻喉外科高级顾问医生慕有恩(Dr Euan Murugasu)指出,多项国际及本地研究已证实,未经治疗的听力损失会加速认知衰退,并增加失智症风险,而这种关联在60岁以上长者尤其明显。

  他指出,听力下降会迫使大脑耗费更多精力辨识声音,削弱记忆与思考力;长期缺乏声音刺激,还可能导致相关脑区萎缩。同时,听不清楚也容易令人减少与亲友交流,长期社交孤立会进一步增加认知退化与失智症风险。

  人的听力通常从40岁起逐渐下降。慕有恩医生强调,及早发现听力问题,并通过助听器或听觉复健介入,已证实有助减缓认知衰退、延缓失智发生。他建议40岁后应每年接受一次听力检查,不必等到听力严重变差才求医。

  慕有恩医生说,听力受损不仅影响听觉,还会增加大脑处理声音的负担,进而影响记忆力、社交互动及认知功能。

  有些患者因为担心听错或听不懂,渐渐避免参与聚会和交谈;也有人因害怕被视为衰老或能力下降,不愿配戴助听器。他认为,大众应消除对听力受损的偏见。他呼吁:“助听器不应被视为软弱的象征”。就像眼镜早已成为日常用品,听觉辅助设备也应被大众坦然接受。 

  慕有恩医生指出,听力退化初期不易察觉。若经常要求别人重复说话、易误解他人意思,或开始依赖读唇沟通,都可能是听力下降的警讯,应尽早接受专业评估。

  除了年龄增长,长期暴露于高噪音环境、遗传、耳朵或脑部感染、部分药物或头部创伤,也会损伤听力。慕有恩医生建议,护耳应从年轻时做起,避免长时间高音量使用耳机,并在怀疑听力下降时尽早检测,越早介入,越有机会同时守护听力与脑健康。

护脑也要护血管护代谢

  中华医院驻院医师兼主治医师陈有珊说,现代医学指出,高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇、睡眠不足、缺乏运动及长期压力,都会增加认知退化风险。中医看待脑健康着眼于心、肾、肝、脾及气血的整体平衡。 

  也是老年疾病组专病医师的陈有珊医师解释,中医认为“脑为髓海”,而“肾藏精、精生髓”,肾精是脑健康的重要基础。随着年纪增长,若长期劳累、久病或体质虚弱,肾精渐亏,便容易出现健忘、头晕、耳鸣及精神不足等表现。

  中医也有“心主神明”之说,这里的“心”不只指心脏,也涵盖精神、意识及思维活动。他说,心血充足、心神安定,人才睡得好、记得牢;若心血不足,则易失眠、多梦、健忘及注意力下降。因此,记忆力下降不单是脑力衰退,往往与心肾不足、气血亏虚、痰瘀阻络及情志失调等因素有关。

  他指出,“三高”在中医辨证中常见肝阳上亢、痰湿内阻或血瘀络阻等。若痰湿、瘀血阻滞脑络,脑部失去濡养,便可能影响反应速度及记忆力,因此“护脑也要护血管、护代谢”,两者本是一体两面。

  睡眠与情绪同样不可忽视。陈有珊医师说,睡眠是脑部修复的重要时段,长期失眠会耗损气血,使脑失所养;长期压力及过度思虑则容易令肝气郁结、心神不安,进一步影响认知功能。

四招护脑好习惯

  陈医师建议,40岁后可以从四方面养护脑健康。

  ①饮食清淡:少油、少甜、少酒,适量摄取黑芝麻、核桃、深色蔬菜和鱼类,但勿迷信单一补品;

  ②保持规律作息:避免熬夜及睡前过度用脑;

  ③坚持运动:通过快步走、太极、八段锦或轻力量训练等运动,促进气血运行;

  ④调适情绪:透过静坐、书法、园艺或与亲友交流调适情绪,让心神安定。

  他提醒,慢性病管理不能单凭感觉,应定期检查指标并遵医嘱控制。若出现明显记忆力下降、容易迷路、表达困难或性格改变,应尽早就医,切忌自行长期服用偏方。从中年起照顾好睡眠、情绪、运动与饮食,并妥善控制慢性病,才是延缓脑退化的根本之道。

报道|孙慧纹

Article Summary: Nanyang University and the Cold War Origins of American Higher Education in Singapore
 
Modern Asian Studies, November 2025 / published June 2026
 
Core Argument
 
This article uses Nanyang University (Nantah) as a case study to show how US Cold War cultural diplomacy intersected with Singapore’s decolonization and nation-building. While America sought to contain communism by building a network of “Free Chinese” education outside the PRC, Singapore’s ruling PAP government strategically redirected these resources to serve its own developmental goals—laying the lasting foundations for Singapore’s close ties with American higher education.
 
Background
 
- Founded in 1956, Nantah was the only Chinese-medium university outside mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, funded largely by local Chinese communities. Long framed as a site of leftist activism or communal interests, the article recasts it also as a key node in US Cold War planning.
- After attaining self-government in 1959, the PAP faced dual challenges: balancing Nantah’s popular support against fears of communist influence, and replacing British-linked scholarships it had just abolished.
 
Key Developments
 
- Secret Collaboration: Before his public speech promising support to Nantah in Oct 1959, PM Lee Kuan Yew privately asked The Asia Foundation (TAF)—a CIA-linked proxy—for funding to send about 50 science graduates yearly to US universities, to be kept covert. TAF, once planning to leave Singapore, welcomed the chance.
- The Scholarship Programme: The resulting Nanyang Graduate Scholarship (later renamed Singapore Graduate Scholarship, 1960–1966) was designed by the US to decouple overseas Chinese youth from the PRC, but was run locally by Singapore’s Public Service Commission. It quickly shifted from supporting mainly Nantah to serving broader state talent needs.
- Changing Dynamics: As Singapore gained more control, American influence over the programme faded. The government increasingly prioritized its own agenda over US Cold War objectives.
 
Major Findings & Legacy
 
- The episode reveals a two-way dynamic: it was not simply US interference, but a strategic co-optation where local elites turned superpower agendas to national advantage.
- In 1967, Singapore formally recognized American university degrees for civil service and scholarships, cementing a long-standing pattern of Singapore’s elites studying in the US.
- It reorients understandings of Singapore’s educational history, showing that its later global links were not “natural” but shaped decisively by Cold War geopolitics and transnational partnerships.
- Nantah was merged into the National University of Singapore in 1980, but its place in these transnational networks helped set Singapore’s enduring role as a hub for American higher education initiatives in Asia.
 
 
 
Would you like me to condense this further into a 3–4 sentence high-level summary, or extract just the key takeaways for quick reference?

Monday, July 20, 2026

Concise Summary
 
This article examines how US Cold War efforts to contain communism by supporting "Free Chinese" education outside mainland China intersected with Singapore’s nation-building, using Nanyang University (Nantah) as the key case. After self-government in 1959, Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew secretly secured backing from the CIA-linked Asia Foundation for graduate scholarships, originally meant to align overseas Chinese students away from the PRC. Singapore’s government gradually redirected this initiative to serve its own developmental needs, leading to the formal recognition of American degrees in 1967 and establishing the enduring pattern of Singaporean elites pursuing education in the United States.

主管回教事务代部长兼内政部高级政务部长费绍尔副教授辞职

新明日报
2026-07-20

和女子网上互动时行为失当

强调两人之间

没发生亲密关系

费绍尔辞职

退出政坛

  费绍尔和女子网上互动时行为失当,未能及早划清界限,即日起辞去政务官及议员职务。

  总理黄循财今午发表声明说,主管回教事务代部长兼内政部高级政务部长费绍尔副教授因个人原因,即日起辞去政务官及议员职务,并退出人民行动党。他已接受辞呈。

  总理公署约一个月前收到一名女公众就她与费绍尔的互动而发来的电邮,总理随即要求跟进此事。

  有关人员分别与费绍尔及女子谈话,了解双方说法。两人多数时候通过线上私信互动,也在公共场合见过面。双方之后互指对方骚扰自己,事件因此交由警方处理。

  警方调查了指控,并在充分考虑案情和相关情况,以及征询总检察署意见后,认为双方均未触犯刑事罪名,因此不会对任何一方采取行动。

  不过,总理指出,费绍尔的行为是否符合政务官及议员应有的标准,则是另一回事。经过反思后,费绍尔接受自己行为未达标,而提出辞呈。

未能及早划清界限

  费绍尔在辞职信中强调,两人之间并没有发生亲密关系,而他也无意让双方发展成那样的关系,但他承认在处理两人间的互动时判断失当,未能及早划清明确界限。

  因此,他认为退出政坛是正确的决定,以便将时间和精力投入家庭。他也感谢总理和人民行动党多年来给予他的支持与友谊。

  58岁的费绍尔请辞前,他负责马林百列—布莱德岭集选区的景万岸区事务。

费绍尔在这种情况下退出政坛

黄总理:感到遗憾

  黄总理对于费绍尔在这种情况下退出政坛感到遗憾。

  总理在声明中表示,对于费绍尔在这样的情况下离开政坛感到遗憾,但他肯定了对方承认行为未达标而决定承担责任的举动。

  他也说,费绍尔担任议员期间勤勉尽责,始终尽心服务选民。在推动增强社区韧性、支持前罪犯改造及重新融入社会,以及改善弱势家庭福祉等倡议中,费绍尔也担任了重要角色。

  总理在写给费绍尔的信中也指出,费绍尔过去20多年的公共服务生涯中作出重大贡献,感谢他过去一年担任主管回教事务代部长一职期间所付出的努力,以及对新加坡的贡献。

  他也祝愿费绍尔和家人一切安好,并希望他拥有所需的时间与空间,专注于家庭。

扎吉哈接替

主管回教事务代部长一职

  扎吉哈接管主管回教事务代部长一职。

  黄循财在声明中也宣布,出任回教社会发展理事会(Yayasan MENDAKI)主席的扎吉哈将接管主管回教事务代部长一职。马林百列—布莱德岭集选区其余议员则会继续为景万岸区居民提供服务。

  扎吉哈也是国防部兼永续发展与环境部高级政务部长。

学者:政治人物言行须谨慎

部长级问责门槛更高

  独立政治观察家陈添金博士指出,任何国会议员或内阁部长,或任何拥有此类权力和责任的人,都应该更清楚地意识到,任何互动都有可能被断章取义。

  “尤其是肩负政治职务者,理应在个人言行举止上更加谨慎。特别是考虑到费绍尔作为主管回教事务代部长一职的重要性,任何争端都必然会对他如何履行职务及个人操守产生影响。”

  新加坡管理大学杨邦孝法学院副教授陈庆文也说,部长级别的问责门槛更高,这也是政府更为看重的标准。

  “虽然这起事件没有构成刑事犯罪,但更大的问题在于,有关行为对公众而言是否可以接受,以及是否站得住脚。”

  他也就黄总理给费绍尔的回函指出,总理在信中明确带出了行动党议员,更遑论政务官所应达到的行为标准。

费绍尔:

辜负支持者 深表歉意

  费绍尔今天也在脸书发文表示,对于辜负一直信任他的居民和支持者,深表歉意。

  他指出,这项消息相信会令许多人感到意外,但为了尊重家人的隐私,不便进一步说明详情,希望公众理解。

  费绍尔表示,多年来有幸与居民同行,走访他们的家庭、聆听他们的心声,并携手建设一个更强大、更美好的新加坡。"居民给予的温暖、友谊和支持,对我而言意义重大,难以用语言表达。”

  他也指出,社区的建设工作是一项远远超越任何个人的集体努力,并有信心扎吉哈和团队将继续以坚定的承诺和关怀持续这份努力,而景万岸区居民也将继续获得马林百列—布莱德岭集选区议员的妥善照顾。

  费绍尔表示,接下来将把更多时间留给家人,并感谢家人在这段艰难时期给予他的支持,尤其是始终陪伴在身边的妻子。

刘慧祺 冯凯麟 报道

AI Computing Power Consumes Electricity as Data Centers Search the World for Power Connections

International Feature: AI Computing Power Consumes Electricity as Data Centers Search the World for Power Connections

Translated by ChatGPT 

For Subscribers Only

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/world/story20260719-9361201?utm_source=android-share&utm_medium=app

19 July 2026

Lianhe Zaobao

Compiled by International News Reporter Tan Jie Ming (陈婕洺)

=====
When the server rooms, servers, and cooling systems of an artificial intelligence (AI) data center are all ready, the costly facility may still remain an unusable "empty shell." Even when everything appears to be in place, what invisible hurdle could prevent an entire data center from being activated, forcing it to wait years before it can begin operating?
=====


When you open the ChatGPT chatbot late at night and type a prompt asking it to plan a long-awaited overseas trip for you, it takes only a few seconds before a detailed itinerary and hotel recommendations appear on your screen. A typical text query like this consumes about 0.3 watt-hours of electricity—roughly equivalent to the amount of electricity a household oven uses in half a second.

Viewed individually, the electricity consumed by a single query seems insignificant. However, when hundreds of millions of prompts pour in continuously, the servers and cooling systems behind the screen bear a tremendous energy burden.

According to data from the International Energy Agency (IEA), global electricity consumption by data centers grew by 17 percent in 2025, far exceeding the approximately 3 percent increase in overall global electricity demand. The IEA forecasts that global electricity consumption by data centers will rise from approximately 415 terawatt-hours in 2024 to around 945 terawatt-hours by 2030—an increase of more than double.

Based on Singapore's annual electricity consumption of about 58 terawatt-hours in 2024, the projected annual electricity consumption of global data centers by 2030 would be equivalent to approximately 16 years of Singapore's nationwide electricity demand.

Over the past 30 years, electrification has continued to expand globally, and by 2023 nearly 92 percent of the world's population had access to electricity. Reliable electricity has become an everyday part of modern life: flip a switch, and power is simply expected to be there.

Now, the artificial intelligence (AI) boom has pushed electricity back to the forefront of geopolitical competition and technological rivalry. Since the explosion of generative AI at the end of 2022, market attention initially focused on chips. However, over the past two years, as data centers have expanded rapidly, the capacity of substations and transmission lines—and whether projects can actually be connected to the power grid—has become the new focal point in the competition over AI infrastructure.

Professor Wen Yonggang, President's Chair Professor at the College of Computing and Data Science at Nanyang Technological University, told Lianhe Zaobao that electricity has now become the first hurdle determining whether a data center project can proceed.

Wen said that 10 years ago, companies selecting sites for data centers typically looked first at land availability, fiber-optic networks, transmission latency, and tax incentives. Electricity supply was generally taken for granted. Today, the situation has reversed. Developers must first determine whether they can obtain hundreds of megawatts of stable, affordable electricity within a reasonable timeframe before considering other factors.

"Chips determine how fast you can compute; electricity determines whether you can compute at all... If a data center cannot begin operations because it cannot be connected to the power grid, then no amount of tax incentives will help."

Competition for electricity among data centers will intensify further as existing facilities are upgraded.

AI's Electricity Needs: Stable, Low-Carbon and Affordable

Dr. David Broadstock, Partner at Asia-Pacific energy consultancy The Lantau Group, said in an interview that data centers continuously upgrade their computing equipment throughout their operational lives. Even if the building itself remains the same size, electricity consumption may increase significantly, causing power demand to grow faster and become more difficult to predict.

"More accurately, the electricity that can be supplied immediately today is insufficient to meet the future electricity demand of data centers. Power infrastructure can be expanded gradually, but the key question is whether expansion can keep pace with the growth in electricity demand from data centers."

However, Wen Yonggang pointed out that this does not mean the world has run out of electricity. Rather, there is a mismatch between electricity supply and demand in terms of timing, location, and supply conditions.

"In terms of timing, data centers and computing infrastructure are expanding rapidly, while power infrastructure cannot keep up at the same pace. In terms of location, data centers generally want to be close to users and fiber-optic networks, but abundant, inexpensive clean energy is often located farther away. Moreover, AI does not require just any form of electricity—it requires electricity that is stable, affordable, and low-carbon."

Investment in Power Generation and Supply Continues to Rise, But Grid Construction Has Fallen Behind

A major reason for the mismatch between electricity supply and demand is that although global investment in power generation continues to grow, grid construction has not kept pace.

The International Energy Agency notes that since 2015, around US$1 trillion (approximately S$1.3 trillion) has been invested annually in power generation facilities worldwide, while investment in electricity grids has risen only to about US$400 billion, with a growth rate of less than half that of power generation investment.

As a result, although power generation capacity has increased, electricity cannot necessarily be delivered promptly to areas with the strongest demand. According to the IEA's Electricity 2026 report, more than 2,500 gigawatts of renewable energy, energy storage, and large electricity-consuming projects—including data centers—are currently waiting to be connected to power grids worldwide.

Laura Cozzi, Director of Sustainability, Technology and Outlooks at the International Energy Agency, told Lianhe Zaobao that although data centers currently account for only about 1.5 percent of global electricity consumption, the latest generation of projects is so large that it has already begun placing pressure on local power grids. In many electricity markets, the grids are already congested. Connecting new projects takes time, while constructing new transmission lines may require many years.

Cozzi said, "Data centers can typically be completed within 18 to 24 months, but grid construction may take as long as 15 years."

Xie Weikeng, Head of Media and Publishing at the Asia Artificial Intelligence Association, said that power supply gaps are particularly evident in countries such as the United States and Canada, where electricity grids were built earlier. Much of the power infrastructure has been in use for many years, urban land is limited, and expansion requires lengthy planning, approvals, and coordination, making it difficult to increase electricity supply quickly in the short term.

Xie also noted that in some regions where development started later, power grids could be planned from the outset to accommodate large electricity-consuming projects such as data centers, potentially avoiding many of the difficulties associated with upgrading older grids. However, actual conditions still depend on whether sufficient land, funding, and supporting infrastructure are available, so no broad generalization can be made.

The International Energy Agency warns that if grid bottlenecks cannot be alleviated, by 2030 approximately one-fifth of the world's planned data center capacity could be delayed because of the inability to connect to power grids in time.

Can AI Use Less Electricity While Doing More?

Since expanding power generation facilities and electricity grids takes many years, and technologies such as space-based computing power and large-scale long-duration energy storage remain immature, one of the more practical solutions at present is to tackle the issue from the demand side—enabling AI to accomplish the same tasks with less electricity during both training and operation.

Wen Yonggang believes that pressure on electricity supply and demand will not stop AI development. Instead, it will force the entire system to become more efficient. Companies will improve not only models and chips, but also adopt more efficient cooling technologies and data center designs. They will also schedule certain training tasks at times and in locations where clean electricity is more readily available.

When selecting models, not every application needs to invoke the largest language models.

Xie Weikeng pointed out that for clearly defined and less complex tasks, companies can use smaller, more specialized models. Large models can also activate only the components most relevant to a given task. This is like assigning work to the most suitable specialist team instead of mobilizing the entire organization, thereby reducing unnecessary computation and electricity consumption.

Besides choosing the right model, it is also important to avoid having AI repeatedly perform the same task.

Zhang Fan, co-founder of Singapore-based Advantage Research Consulting, said that some AI agents repeatedly call models, consuming large numbers of unnecessary tokens and computing power. Therefore, reducing AI's electricity consumption requires not only selecting suitable models, but also optimizing workflows to reduce unnecessary calls. Chinese large language models such as Doubao, Tongyi Qianwen, and Tencent Hunyuan have already begun making such optimizations.

However, Broadstock cautioned that although more extensive training or higher electricity consumption during the initial stage may consume more power, it may also enable the model to operate faster during later use. Therefore, evaluating AI energy efficiency should not focus solely on the training stage but should also consider subsequent use. At the same time, AI performance should not be fundamentally reduced or innovation hindered simply because of electricity constraints.

On the other hand, besides reducing its own electricity consumption, AI can also help the energy system save electricity and improve efficiency.

The International Energy Agency notes that energy companies have begun using AI to forecast and integrate solar and wind power generation, allowing these energy sources to be connected to power grids more effectively. AI can also assist with electricity dispatching, identify equipment faults and maintenance needs in advance, and enable existing energy infrastructure to operate more reliably and efficiently.

For example, AI can identify and locate grid faults more quickly, reducing power outage durations by about 30 to 50 percent. Combined with remote sensors and intelligent management systems, AI could also release up to 175 gigawatts of transmission capacity from existing power grids without constructing new transmission lines.

The International Energy Agency estimates that if AI is widely used in power plant operations and maintenance, it could save up to US$110 billion annually by 2035.

Who Will Ultimately Pay for the Surge in Data Center Electricity Consumption?

Data centers require expanded power generation facilities, substations, and transmission lines. One of the public's biggest concerns is who will ultimately bear these additional costs—technology companies, power companies, or ordinary consumers.

Some parts of the United States have already experienced situations where data center expansion has driven up electricity costs for traditional businesses.

PJM, which serves 13 U.S. states, is the country's largest regional grid operator. To ensure sufficient electricity supply during peak demand periods, PJM pays power generators in advance to reserve generation capacity that can be activated when needed. This payment for ensuring electricity is available when required is known as the capacity price.

In recent years, the rapid increase in data centers within the PJM region has caused electricity demand to grow faster than generating capacity. To ensure sufficient future electricity supply, PJM has had to purchase reserve generating capacity from power producers at much higher prices. As a result, the capacity price has risen from US$28.92 per megawatt-day in 2024 to US$329.17—an increase of more than tenfold.

The problem is that these additional costs are not charged solely to data centers. Under PJM's pricing mechanism, users within the same electricity market share the costs, which are reflected in the capacity charges they each pay. As a result, manufacturers and businesses already operating in the region also have to bear the higher costs.

Belden Brick, a long-established brick manufacturer in Ohio, is one such example. Although it has nothing to do with the AI industry, its monthly capacity charge has risen from US$1,600 to US$12,000, while its total electricity bill has increased by about 90 percent within a year.

This case demonstrates that the higher regional electricity supply costs driven by data center expansion may be passed on to other businesses through electricity market pricing mechanisms. If businesses cannot absorb these costs over the long term, they may ultimately pass them on to consumers through higher prices for goods and services.

Will Data Center Expansion Push Up Singapore's Electricity Prices?

Singapore's electricity market differs from that of the United States, but similar cost issues are equally relevant.

Singapore has stable infrastructure, international connectivity, a sound legal system, a mature cloud services ecosystem, and a large base of financial institutions and corporate users, making it a regional data center hub. However, limited land, high energy costs, and the tropical climate's cooling requirements also raise the barriers to further expansion.

According to data from construction consultancy Turner & Townsend, the construction cost of data centers in Singapore increased from US$11.40 per watt in 2023 to US$14.50 per watt in 2025—an accumulated increase of about 27 percent over two years, second only to Tokyo among the world's major markets.

In addition, although Singapore's current electricity system is generally reliable, approximately 95 percent of its electricity is generated from imported natural gas. Fluctuations in international fuel prices and supply disruptions could affect local electricity prices and energy security.

Zhang Fan pointed out that whether the additional electricity costs arising from increased data center demand are ultimately passed on to residential electricity bills and everyday prices depends largely on how each jurisdiction differentiates and prices industrial and residential electricity.

"In some U.S. markets, electricity prices are relatively market-driven. If industrial and residential electricity are not clearly separated, or if their pricing is linked, higher industrial electricity costs may be passed on to household electricity bills relatively quickly. In most Asian markets, however, industrial and residential electricity are priced separately. Therefore, the additional electricity costs brought by data centers are usually borne by businesses first and do not necessarily show up directly in household electricity bills."

AI expert Xie Weikeng believes that some of the additional costs will most likely eventually be passed on to consumers, as this is the normal way costs are transmitted in many industries. However, data centers also stimulate economic activity and enhance economic potential. Therefore, when evaluating the impact of rising costs, it is also necessary to assess whether they bring corresponding investment, productivity gains, and economic growth.

IEA energy expert Laura Cozzi emphasized that there is no strict linear relationship between growing data center loads and electricity prices. "If policies can integrate data centers into electricity networks in an intelligent, efficient, and flexible manner, there is no reason to believe they will necessarily drive up electricity prices."

Whether electricity prices will rise and who ultimately bears the costs are only one aspect of AI's electricity challenge. More importantly, countries must be able to deliver stable, affordable electricity to ever-expanding computing facilities in a timely manner.

Moreover, competition in AI has never depended on a single factor. While electricity is the entry ticket determining whether projects can proceed, advanced chips, computing architectures, and model efficiency still determine how fast and how far AI can advance.

Different countries also face different resource conditions and development bottlenecks. Some lack electricity; others are constrained by advanced chips; still others are held back by shortages of talent, capital, or infrastructure. In the future, the countries and companies that will be most competitive are those that can coordinate chips, computing power, algorithms, and energy, while transforming technology into practical applications at lower cost and higher efficiency.

Compiled by Tan Jie Ming